Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 477

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 298


Nisha and Uday G: C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker and guidance for use of antibiotic therapy in patients presenting with lower respiratory tract manifestations in intensive care unit in tertiary care centre


Introduction

C-reactive protein is a acute phase plasma protein of the pentraxin family, is produced and released by hepatocytes and adipocytes, playing distinct roles in innate and adaptive immunity with inflammatory effects.1, 2 CRP has been reported to function by binding to the phosphocholine moieties that are located on some damaged cells and certain bacteria, and to have a crucial part in complement activation through strengthening phagocytosis, which may clear dead cells and bacteria.3, 4 Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and other cytokines such as Tumour necrosis factor(TNF), Interleukin-1(IL-1) and Transforming growth factor (TGF) are also involved in CRP production.5, 6 A number of conditions stimulate CRP synthesis including pulmonary infarction, vasculitis, liver disease, inflammation, neoplasia, bacterial infections are most potent stimuli leading to marked elevation of serum CRP with in few hours. Pneumonia elicits a powerful inflammatory response both locally and systematically with chemotactic cytokine release into peripheral circulation. CRP has also being used as an index of response to treatment in rheumatic fever and certain other conditions.7 CRP is tested either by capillary precipitation of patient sera with anti-sera prepared in rabbits against purified CRP or by passive agglutination using latex particles coated with anti-CRP antibodies.8 It is a simple blood test to distinguish between viral and bacterial pneumonia.

Raised CRP value in viral infection during first week may mislead the clinician in the decision to prescribe antibiotics and may also explain why the CRP has shown a higher specificity in predicting pneumonia after one week then in first week of respiratory tract infections.9

Aim and Objectives of the Study

  1. To evaluate the CRP level in the patients admitted with acute respiratory symptoms.

  2. To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum CRP in differentiating pneumonia from other respiratory conditions.

  3. To evaluate the severity of pneumonia with serum CRP level.

  4. To evaluate the need of antibiotic usage in patients with acute respiratory symptoms.

  5. To evaluate the prognostic value of CRP in comparison with WBC count.

Materials and Methods

It is a prospective study of 60 patients admitting with the acute respiratory signs and symptoms in Intensive Care Unit of Mallareddy institute of medical sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana. Serum sample was preserved at the time of presentation and CRP was measured in undiluted sera and in dilution of 1/10, 1/20, 1/30, 1/40, 1/60, 1/80, 1/100 using a commercially available latex agglutination test (Humatex CRP). Value of CRP was calculated by multiplying the denominator of dilution by 6 to get value in mg/l. Mid-value of positive and negative titre was used in calculation. CRP concentration of > 20mg/l is taken as positive according to our lab. CRP level mean, median were calculated and CRP level positivity in patients is correlated with no of patients with raised WBC count and sputum culture positivity by using chi-square test and p value <0.005 is considered significant.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age >18 years old admitted to our hospital,

  2. Respiratory symptoms like cough, sputum production, dyspnoea, tachypnoea, pleuritic pain as main complaint with or without fever.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Final diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, lung malignancy, upper respiratory tract infection like acute pharyngitis, rhinitis and sinusitis

  2. Patient with severe immunosuppression like HIV and haematological disease or who receive immuno-suppressive therapy like prednisolone.

  3. Non-hospitalization patients.

  4. Liver disease and vasculitis.

Hospitalisation criteria for the patients

  1. Patients who need respiratory support (SPO2 less than 90, Respiratory acidosis, Ph<7.3.

  2. Patients with hypotension who require vasopressor drugs.

  3. Patiets with confusion or unconsciousness.

  4. Patients with respiratory rate >30.

Measurements

Patients with known response to initial adequate treatment in emergency department.

At the initial visit to emergency department patients demographic data and basic clinical information was collected and in addition to it markers of infection like Complete blood count, Serum CRP level measured by latex agglutination method, sputum for gram staining, AFB, culture sensitivity, blood culture and sensitivity, chest X-ray, HRCT and 2 Decho were done. To stratify the severity CURB 65 score (confusion, serum urea, respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure of patient) were used to decide the severity of pneumonia patients. LRTI was defined by the presence of atleast one respiratory symptom (cough, sputum production, dyspnoea, tachypnoea, i.e. crepitations or wheeze or one sign of infection like temp>38 ⁰C, shivering, leucocyte count <4000 or For pneumonia a new infiltrate, haziness, consolidation, effusion on chest X-ray.initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease(gold guidelines) as FEV1/FEC ratio <70%. Acute bronchitis defined as LRTI in the absence of underlying lung disease or COPD or infiltrates on chest X-ray.grounds(history, physical examination, chest high resolution computerised tomography, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram).

Table 1

Sex distribution among patients

Sex Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Female 22 36.7 36.7 36.7
Male 38 63.3 63.3 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

Table 2

Distribution of patients on basis of diagnosis

Diagnosis Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Autoimmune 5 8.3 8.3 8.3
Bronchial asthma 7 11.7 11.7 20.0
CCF 4 6.7 6.7 26.7
COPD 11 18.3 18.3 45.0
Interstitial lung 3 5.0 5.0 50.0
Pneumonia 24 40.0 40.0 90.0
Pulmonary TB 6 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

Table 3

CRP level among patients

CRP Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Normal 31 51.7 51.7 51.7
positive 29 48.3 48.3 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

Table 4

WBC count among patients

WBC Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Normal 42 70.0 70.0 70.0
Raised 18 30.0 30.0 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

Table 5

Use of antibiotic among patients

Antibiotic Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Given 21 35.0 35.0 35.0
Not given 39 65.0 65.0 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

Table 6

Correlation of CRP in patients with different diagnosis

Diagnosis Frequency and percentage CRP-Normal CRP- Positive Total
Autoimmune frequency 1 4 5
% in CRP 3.2% 13.8% 8.3%
Bronchial asthma frequency 5 2 7
% in CRP 16.1% 6.9% 11.7%
CCF frequency 4 0 4
% in CRP 12.9% 0.0% 6.7%
COPD frequency 8 3 11
% in CRP 25.8% 10.3% 18.3%
Interstitial lung disease frequency 0 3 3
% in CRP 0.0% 10.3% 5.0%
Pneumonia frequency 9 15 24
% in CRP 29.0% 51.7% 40.0%
Pulmonary TB frequency 4 2 6
% in CRP 12.9% 6.9% 10.0%
Total frequency 31 29 60
% of CRP 51.66% 48.33% 100%

Table 0
value df Asymp .sig
Pearson Chi-Square 14.475 6 0.025
Likelihood ratio 17.447 6 0.008
N of valid cases 60
Chi-Square Test
Table 7

Sputum culture positivity among patients

Diagnosis Number of patients with sputum culture positive Percent
pneumonia 10 48%
Tuberculosis 2 9%
COPD 3 14%
Bronchial asthma 2 10%
Congestive cardiac failure 0 0%
Autoimmune disorders 4 19%
Interstitial lung disease 0 0%
Total 21 100%
Table 8

Correlation of CRP level with causative organism among patients

Causative organism CRP normal CRP positive Total
Fungal Growth frequency 0 2 2
% in CRP 0.0% 6.9% 3.3%
E.coli frequency 0 1 1
% in CRP 0.0% 3.4% 1.7%
Klebsiella frequency 0 4 4
% in CRP 0.0% 13.8% 6.7%
Proteus frequency 0 3 3
% in CRP 0.0% 10.4% 5%
Pseudomonas frequency 0 1 1
% in CRP 0.0% 3.4% 1.7%
Staphylococcus aureus frequency 0 2 2
% in CRP 0.0% 6.9% 3.3%
Sterile frequency 31 8 39
% in CRP 100.0% 27.6% 65.0%
Streptococcus pneumonia frequency 0 8 8
% in CRP 0.0% 27.6% 13.3%
Total frequency 31 29 60
% in CRP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 0
Value df Asymp.sig
Pearson Chi-Square 34.536a 9 .000
Chi-Square Test
Table 9

Frequency table showing CRP positivity, sputum positivity, raised WBC count and antibiotic usage in patients

S.No Diagnosis No. of cases Cases with CRP positive Sputum positive WBC count Antibiotic given
1 Pneumonia 24 15 10 10 10
2 COPD 11 3 3 2 3
3 Tuberculosis 6 2 2 0 2
4 Autoimmune disorder 5 4 4 3 4
5 Congestive cardiac failure 4 0 0 0 0
6 Bronchial asthma 7 2 2 2 2
7 Interstitial lung disease 3 3 0 0 0
8 total 60 29 21 18 21
Table 10

Correlation of WBC count with CRP level

WBC Frequency and percent CRP normal CRP positive Total
Normal frequency 31 11 42
% in CRP 100.0% 37.9% 70.0%
Raised frequency 0 18 18
% in CRP 0.0% 62.1% 30.0%
Total frequency 31 29 60
% in CRP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 0
Value df Asymp.Sig.
Pearson Chi-Square 27.488a 1 .000
Chi-Square Test
Table 11

Correlation of CRP level with antibiotic usage in patients

Antibiotic Frequency and percent CRP normal CRP positive Total
Given frequency 0 21 21
% in CRP 0.0% 72.4% 35.0%
Not given frequency 31 8 39
% in CRP 100.0% 27.6% 65.0%
Total frequency 31 29 60
% in CRP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 0
Value df Asymp.Sig.
Pearson Chi-Square 34.536a 1 .000
Chi-Square Test
Table 12

Correlation table of antibiotic usage in patients with raised WBC count

Antibiotic Frequency and percent WBC normal WBC raised Total
Given frequency 7 14 21
% in CRP 16.7% 77.8% 35.0%
Not given frequency 35 4 39
% in CRP 83.3% 22.2% 65.0%
Total frequency 42 18 60
% in CRP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 0
Value df Asymp.Sig.
Pearson Chi-Square 20.684a 1 .000
Chi-Square Test
Table 13

Mean CRP level among patients with various patients

Diagnosis N Mean Std deviation Std error 95%CI lower 95%CI upper Minimum Maximum
autoimmune 5 86.20 77.338 34.587 -9.83 182.23 17 180
Bronchial asthma 7 22.86 17.430 6.588 6.74 38.98 8 48
CCF 4 12.00 3.162 1.581 6.97 17.03 8 15
COPD 11 20.00 14.738 4.444 10.10 29.90 5 60
Interstitial lung disease 3 42.33 5.859 3.383 27.78 56.89 38 49
Pneumonia 24 153.25 152.936 31.218 88.67 217.83 12 480
Pulmonary TB 6 27.50 18.876 7.706 7.69 47.31 15 64
Total 60 80.48 116.332 15.018 50.43 110.54 5 480

Table 0
Sum of squares df Mean square F Sig
Between groups 230698.660 6 38449.777 3.589 0.005
Within groups 567758.324 53 10712.421
Total 798456.983 59
ANOVA

Table 14

Median CRP value in patients with various diagnosis

S.No Diagnosis Median CRP value
1 Pneumonia 95
2 Autoimmune disorder 42
3 Interstitial lung disease 40
4 Tuberculosis 18.5
5 Bronchial asthma 14
6 COPD 17
7 Congestive cardiac failure 12.5

Results

Total 60 patients admitting into Mallareddy institute of medical sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana has been included in these prospective study. CRP was measured in undiluted sera and in various dilution at the time of presentation as already described and value calculated. The parenchymal involvement of lung in various diseases was confirmed on chest X ray and high resolution CT scan of chest and cardiac involvement was proved on echocardiography. Total 60 patients were taken for study out of which 38 were male and 22 were female(Table 1). Out of which 24(40%) were diagnosed with pneumonia,6(10%) with pulmonary koch’s, 7(11.6%) with acute exacerbation of asthma, 11(18.3%) were COPD, 4(6%) with congestive cardiac failure, 5(8.3%) with autoimmune disorder and 3(5%) with Interstitial lung disease (Table 2). Among them 29(48.3%) patients were found to have CRP value of more than 20mg/l which is considered as positive as shown in Table 3 out of these 29 patients, 15(51.7%) were having pneumonia which was confirmed on imaging and sputum culture and sensitivity (Table 8 ). for bacteria in which 4(19%) were diagnosed as autoimmune disorder,2(9%) with bronchial asthma, 10(47.6%) with pneumonia, 3(14.2%) with COPD, 2(9.5%) with pulmonary Koch’s(Table 8). T8 suggest positive pneumonia patients.

Among 29 patients with positive CRP, 18(62%) patients have the WBC count of >11,000cells/mm3. Out of 24 Patients with pneumonia have increase WBC count in 10 patients, 2 patients in COPD, 3 patient in autoimmune disorders, in 2 patients of bronchial asthma no patient with Congestive cardiac failure no patient with tuberculosis and interstitial disease as shown in (Table 11 ). Patients with CRP positivity who were having positive culture sensitivity {21 patients(72.4%)} were started on antibiotic therapy. Out of total 24 pneumonia cases,10(41.6%) were sputum culture positive as well as CRP positive pneumonia. Out of 15 patients with CRP positive in pneumonia 10 cases(66.6%), were found to have raised WBC count. All these 10 cases have sputum positive on culture sensitivity (Table 11 ) patient with pneumonia (24) 10 patient have sputum culture as positive and were started on antibiotics, 5 patients with autoimmune disorders 4 were sputum positive, in 11 COPD patients 3 patients were sputum positive and started on antibiotics, out of 6 patients with Tuberculosis 2 were sputum positive were started on antibiotics and out of 7 patients in bronchial asthma 2 were sputum positive and started on antibiotics, whereas in congestive cardiac failure (4) and interstitial lung disease (3) were not having any sputum positivity so no antibiotic therapy was given(Table 11).

In our study the correlation of raised WBC count in no of patients is done with no of CRP positive individuals is done using chi -square test as shown in Table 12. 18 patients with CRP positive were having raised WBC count which is 62.1% which is found statistically significant.

In our study the correlation of CRP level positivity is done with antibiotic use in patient as shown in Table 14 that antibiotic given in 21 CRP positive patients out of 29 which is 72.4% patients which is statistically significant as p value <0.005 using chi-square test. The correlation of antibiotic usage with raised WBC count is also found out as shown in Table 16 that 14 patients with raised WBC count were given antibiotics which is 77.8% which is statistically significant by chi-square test with p value of <0.005.

As according to the result of our study the patients of pneumonia and autoimmune disorders had higher CRP in comparison with patients with COPD, bronchial asthma, Congestive cardiac failure and Interstitial lung disease. Patient with high CRP have raised WBC count. No significant difference of CRP found in the sex distribution of the patients. Patients with positive CRP, Positive sputum culture and sensitivity with increased WBC counts were started on specific antibiotic therapy. A CRP value of more than 20mg/l is considered positive.

Discussion

In healthy adults, the normal concentrations of CRP varies between 0.8 mg/L to 3.0 mg/L. However, some healthy adults show elevated CRP at 10 mg/L. CRP concentrations also increase with age, possibly due to subclinical conditions. There is also no seasonal variations of CRP concentrations. Gene polymorphism of interleukin 1 family, interleukin 6, and polymorphic GT repeat of the CRP gene do affect the usual CRP concentrations when a person does not have any medical illnesses.10 CRP is used mainly as an inflammation marker. Apart from liver failure, there are few known factors that interfere with CRP production.10 Interferon alpha inhibits CRP production from liver cells which may explain the relatively low levels of CRP found during viral infections compared to bacterial infections.11 The plasma half-life of CRP is 19 hours, and is constant in all medical conditions. When there is a stimulus, the CRP level can increase 10,000-fold from less than 50 μg/l to more than 500 mg/L. Its concentration can increase to 5 mg/L by 6 hours and peak at 48 hours. Therefore, the only factor that affects the blood CRP concentration is its production rate, which increases with inflammation, infection, trauma, necrosis, malignancy, and allergic reactions. Other inflammatory mediators that can increase CRP are TGF beta 1, and tumour necrosis factor alpha.

In acute inflammation, CRP can increase as much as 50 to 100 mg/L within 4 to 6 hours in mild to moderate inflammation or an insult such as skin infection, cystitis, or bronchitis. It can double every 8 hours and reaches its peak at 36 to 50 hours following injury or inflammation.CRP between 100 and 500 mg/L is considered highly predictive of inflammation due to bacterial infection. Once inflammation subsides, CRP level falls quickly because of its relatively short half-life.12 CRP concentrations between 2 and 10 mg/L are considered as metabolic inflammation: metabolic pathways that cause arteriosclerosis and type II diabetes mellitus. Normal levels increase with aging.13 Higher levels are found in late pregnant women, mild inflammation and viral infections (10–40 mg/L), active inflammation, bacterial infection (40–200 mg/L), severe bacterial infections and burns (>200 mg/L).14 In our study we took CRP > 20 mg/l as positive according to our laboratory values. And our study shows that CRP value in case of pneumonia patients with sputum positivity has higher value than in sputum negative pneumonia. According to the table no-the153.25,86.20Interstitial lung disease is 42.3, Tuberculosis is 27.50, Bronchial asthma is 22.86.

According to table no- 14 the median values of Pneumonia is 95, Autoimmune is 42, ILD is 40, Bronchial asthma is 14, COPD is 17, CCF is 12.5 and TB is 18.5. The British Thoracic Society stated that the measurement of serum CRP on admission may be helpful in distinguishing pneumonia from other lower respiratory tract infestations with moderate weight being placed on this recommendation.15

Conclusion

Serum CRP levels is a useful marker for establishing the diagnosis of Higher CRP values are suggestive of severity of the disease which may help in deciding the appropriateness of use of antibiotic in the line of management with lower infections.

Limitations

No relationship found in our study between CRP level and parenchymal and endobronchial involvement in lung and parenchymal involvement and causative organism.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

There was no grant from any source, here was no connection with companies producing any substance or apparatus for my article and there was no writing assistance for my article.

References

1 

Helen Swede Alexandra M. Hajduk Jyoti Sharma Shristi Rawal Homaira Rasool Anthony T. Vella Baseline serum C-reactive protein and death from colorectal cancer in the NHANES III cohortInt J Cancer201413481862700020-7136Wiley

2 

Thomas W. McDade Julienne Rutherford Linda Adair Christopher W. Kuzawa Early origins of inflammation: microbial exposures in infancy predict lower levels of C-reactive protein in adulthoodProc Biol Sci201027716841129370962-8452, 1471-2954The Royal Society

3 

Reshmi Mukerji Shaper Mirza Aoife M. Roche Rebecca W. Widener Christina M. Croney Dong-Kwon Rhee Pneumococcal Surface Protein A Inhibits Complement Deposition on the Pneumococcal Surface by Competing with the Binding of C-Reactive Protein to Cell-Surface PhosphocholineJ Immunol2012189115327350022-1767, 1550-6606The American Association of Immunologists

4 

J. Lu K. D. Marjon L. L. Marnell R. Wang C. Mold T. W. Du Clos Recognition and functional activation of the human IgA receptor (Fc RI) by C-reactive proteinProc Natl Acad Sci USA201110812497490027-8424, 1091-6490Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

5 

J V Castell Z Gomez M J Lechon M David Acute phase response of human hepatocytes. Regulation of acute phase protein synthesis by IL-6Hepatol199012117986

6 

J E Sim C D March D Cosman c-DNA expression cloning of the IL-I receptor a member of the immunoglobulin super familySci19882415859

7 

P L Mccarthy A L Frank R C Ablow Value of Creactive protein test in the differentiation of bacterial and viral pneumoniaJ Pediatr1996924546

8 

R Ananthnaryan C K H Paniker Textbook of Microbiology4th edOrient Longman Publications1990

9 

J T Whicher R E Chambers J Higginson L Nashef P G Higgins Acute phase response of serum amyloid A protein and C reactive protein to the common cold and influenza.J Clin Pathol198538331260021-9746BMJ

10 

Mark B. Pepys Gideon M. Hirschfield C-reactive protein: a critical updateJ Clin Investig2003111121805120021-9738American Society for Clinical Investigation

11 

H Enocsson C Sjöwall T Skogh M L Eloranta L Rönnblom J Wetterö Interferon-alpha mediates suppression of C-reactive protein: explanation for muted C-reactive protein response in lupus flaresArthritis Rheumatism20096012375560

12 

C Bray L N Bell H Liang R Haykal F Kaiksow J J Mazza Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-reactive Protein Measurements and Their Relevance in Clinical Medicine"(PDF)Wisconsin Med J2016115631721

13 

Lothar Thomas Labor Und DiagnoseTH- BooksFrankfurt20081010

14 

K S Chew What's new in Emergencies Trauma and Shock? C-reactive protein as a potential clinical biomarker for influenza infection: More questions than answersJ Emerg Trauma Shock20125211157

15 

W S Lim S V Baudouin R C George British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: updateThorax2009643155



jats-html.xsl

© 2020 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)