Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 416

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 348


Kumar and Bose: An observational, prospective and comparative study to assess metabolic abnormality in patients of urolithiasis in paediatric age group in a tertiary care center of Bihar


Introduction

Urolithiasis is most common in adults and the occurrence is lees in paediatric age group.1 Overall occurrence rate of urolithiasis in children is only 2-3% of total cases.2

The prevalence, composition of stone, position of stone and clinical characteristics of urolithiasis immensely varies in different geographical area. It contrasts significantly from one country to another.3, 4 Climatic condition, dietary behaviour and socioeconomic factors plays vital role in extensive geographic variation of urolithiasis. Genetic inheritance, environmental factors, nutrition, metabolic abnormalities, anatomical characteristics and calculus- inducing drugs are predisposing risk factors for urolithiasis in children.1

Children have significant morbidity who are suffering from urolithiasis. Different metabolic parameters either serum or urinary gets deranged in urolithiasis. Evaluation of these parameters help in identification and diagnosis of risk factors involved in recurrent stone formation and early diagnosis helps in prevention and treatment of stone disease and related comorbidities.5, 6 Different studies showed range of prevalence of metabolic risk factors from ˂20% to >50%.6, 7, 8, 9 In one-third of the stone-formers hypercalciuria and hypocitraturia are seen as the common metabolic abnormalities.7, 9, 10 Approximately 20% of cases has reported hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria.7, 11

Global incidence of urolithiasis in paediatric patients has been increased in the last few decades.12, 13, 14 The pattern of urolithiasis has also changed, showing increase in kidney stones secondary to calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate and decrease in bladder stones composed of ammonium and urate.15

Change or variation in incidence and pattern of paediatric urolithiasis may be connected to the dietary practices in the different region.16 That’s gives evidence of marked regional variations in the stone prevalence recognised as “Stone Belts”. Local climatic conditions also play an important role in stone pathogenesis. It is evident that stone occurrence increases in warmer and sunnier regions. Also, risk of stone disease depends on familial predisposition and genetic susceptibility.1

Prevention of stone formation can be done by early diagnosis and treatment of these metabolic risk factors. At present very few studies have been conducted on metabolic assessment of urinary stones in patients of paediatric age group in India.

Aims and Objectives

Aim of this study was to evaluate and observe the different metabolic risk factors (serum and urinary metabolic abnormalities) for urolithiasis in children. We had assessed, observed and compared serum metabolic parameters (like calcium, phosphorus, creatinine, uric acid, electrolytes, Parathyroid hormone and albumin) and 24 hours urinary metabolic parameters (like urinary pH, volume, uric acid, calcium, oxalate, creatinine, citrate).

Materials and Methods

Study site

This study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery and Urology, Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Jamuhar, Rohtas, Bihar, India.

Study duration

One and half year (Eighteen months) from January 2019 to July 2020.

Study design

This was an observational and prospective study on fifty (n=50) children with confirmed diagnosis of urolithiasis below 12 years of either sex. This study was approved from Institutional Ethical Committee of Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Jamuhar. Informed consent from the parents/guardian of children were taken.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children with both gender and age ≤12 years were included.

  2. Children with confirm diagnosis of urolithiasis were included.

  3. Children with clear urinalysis and culture report were included.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Children with UTI on urine analysis were excluded.

  2. Children had previously diagnosed metabolic, endocrine, gastrointestinal disorder were excluded.

  3. Children had Protein Energy Malnutrition were excluded.

  4. Children on Calcium, Vitamin D, and Vitamin C supplementation were excluded.

History of disease from study participants were taken carefully and they were thoroughly examined clinically. Various laboratory tests were performed like complete blood count, routine urine and urine culture and sensitivity (to diagnose Urinary Tract Infections, UTI). Diagnosis of Urolithiasis and urinary tract abnormalities were confirmed by

  1. Ultrasonography,

  2. Intravenous pyelogram and

  3. Computed Tomography (CT scan) in selected cases.

During study period those children who had been diagnosed with UTI were treated beforehand, so that, their urinalysis and urine culture report become clear or normal and then their metabolic evaluation was performed.

From all study participants, dietary practice and water consumption per day over previous 3 months was inquired and documented.

All urine samples were taken without any dietary restrictions. Random urine sample was taken in cases of infants and non- toilet-trained children and 24-hour urine was collected in toilet-trained children. Following laboratory investigations were performed and results were recorded.

Urinalysis- Normal level of 24-hour urinary parameter in paediatric age group.17

  1. Routine urine

  2. Urine culture

  3. 24 hours urinary pH- 4-9

  4. Volume- > 1ml/kg/hr

  5. Calcium- < 4 mg/kg/day

  6. Oxalate- < 0.57 mg/kg/day

  7. Citrate- > 6 mg/kg/day

  8. Uric acid- < 10 mg/kg/day

  9. Creatinine- 0.5 to 1.0 mg/dL for children ages 3 to 18 years, 0.3 to 0.7 mg/dL for children under age 3

Biochemical investigations included

  1. Serum calcium

  2. Serum phosphorus

  3. Serum creatinine

  4. Serum uric acid

  5. Serum electrolytes

  6. Serum Parathyroid hormone

  7. Serum albumin

Statistical analysis

Data collected from this study had been presented in tabular form. Statistical analysis was performed with the help of Microsoft Excel Software and GraphPad Instat Software.

Results

Out of 50 children in this study, 35 (70%) were male and 15 (30%) were female. Twenty-three participants were below five years of age.

According to dietary habits 60% (n=30) and 14% (n=7) of children had low Calcium intake and high calcium intake respectively. 64% (n=32) children showed low 24-hour urine volume due to low water intake.

64% (n=32) children showed metabolic abnormality, out of them serum abnormality and 24-hour urinary metabolic abnormality was found in 21 and 11 children respectively.

Table 1

Serum abnormality in children with urolithiasis

Serum abnormality

No of patient (n=21)

Hypocalcaemia

18(85.71%)

Hypocalcaemia+ Hyperphosphataemia

02 (9.52%)

Hypercalcaemia

00 (00%)

Hyperuricaemia

01 (4.76%)

85.71% (n=18) children had hypocalcaemia with normal PTH and 14.29% (n=3) had secondary hyperparathyroidism (Table 1).

Table 2

Urinary metabolic abnormality in children with urolithiasis

Urinary metabolic abnormality

No of patients (n=11)

Hypercalciuria

03(27.27%)

Hyperoxaluria

01 (9.09%)

Hypocitruria

06 (54.55%)

Hyperuricosuria

01 (9.09%)

Out of 11 children, hypocitruria was the most common urinary irregularity and seen in 06 patients followed by hypercalciuria in 03 patients (Table 2).

Table 3

Analysis of urinary stone in children with urolithiasis

Type of stone

No of patients (20)

Calcium oxalate

11(55%)

Calcium phosphate

02(10%)

Uric acid

03(15%)

Cystine

01(5%)

Struvite

03(15%)

On stone analysis it was found that majority (n=11, 55%) of the children had calcium oxalate stone. Stone analysis was done in 20 patients.

Discussion

Urolithiasis in paediatric age group had metabolic and genitourinary anomalies co-exists as a risk factor. Morbidity of urolithiasis is very high.

Urolithiasis can lead to urinary tract infection (UTI), hypertension, scarring of kidney, obstruction and progressive worsening of renal function. UTI is approximately seen in 8-45.9% of children having urolithiasis.18, 19 Also, it is evident from some studies that 62% of patients under five years of age, UTI leads to urolithiasis.20, 21 Hence screening of metabolic risk factors should be essential in all children with stone disease.22

In this study low calcium intake was seen in majority of patients (60%) which suggested that low calcium consumption is linked with higher occurrence of urolithiasis and it might have two mechanisms.

1) Low calcium consumption possibly leads to rise in existing intestinal oxalate and this later on increases oxalate absorption, thus raising the super saturation of calcium oxalate. But in this study only one patient had low calcium intake and associated hyperoxaluria.

2) Low calcium consumption excites calcitriol production which causes hypercalcaemia which prevents PTH production and thus causes hypercalciuria.23, 24, 25 In this study, hypercalciuria was seen only in three children and none of them had hypercalcaemia.

In 33 patients, low urine volume was contributory finding. In an earlier study it was perceived that occurrence of nephrolithiasis was decreased in those subjects who had increased levels of dietary calcium. Low water consumption and low urine volume was main finding and result was comparable to earlier works.26 Stone risk factor in nephrolithiasis was urine volume and for prevention of stone repetitions, large intake of water is preliminary therapy.27

Hence for the initial treatment of urinary stones it is highly recommended to take oral fluid by children. Also, mothers should be instructed to give adequate water.

Hypocalcaemia related to diet occurs due to low intake of calcium, high intake of phosphates, low magnesium are common reasons of hypocalcaemia associated with diet. In this study low calcium consumption was the chief cause of hypocalcaemia. Finding correlation between hypocalcaemia and urolithiasis was very difficult in this study because majority of the patient was associated with low water intake and less urine volume.

24-hour urinary abnormality was found only in 22% (n=11) patients, though hypocitruria (n=6, 54.55%) was the most common urinary abnormality and this result was comparable with previous literature. 54% patients had urinary metabolic irregularity seen by Naseri et al.28

90% of patients had urinary metabolic abnormality with hypocitruria was most common abnormality seen by Erbagci et al.29 This opposing result may be due to normal reference level of 24-hour urinary metabolic parameters were taken according to western literature and deficiency of Indian literature on normal reference level of 24-hour urinary metabolic parameters.

Findings of stone analysis does not correlate with urinary findings in this study. Stone analysis done on 20 patients, out of which only five had 24-hour urinary metabolic abnormality. Calcium oxalate stone was found in 11 patients and only three had hypercalciuria. The reason for this contradiction was unknown which may be again 24-hour reference value which is causing the problem in correlation.

Conclusion

Predominant finding from this study was low urine volume secondary to low water intake. Hypocalcaemia is major metabolic abnormality in contradiction to western literature. There were no nomograms for urinary excretion of Calcium, uric acid, oxalate and citrate in Indian children. Increased fluid intake and keeping blood calcium level at optimal level may be useful to prevent urolithiasis in children. Reference range for 24-hour urinary parameters must be further studied and established for paediatric population.

Source of Funding

No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

1 

AP Sharma G Filler Epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasisIndian J Urol20102645162210.4103/0970-1591.74450

2 

RD Schwarz NT Dwyer Pediatric kidney stones: Long-term outcomesUrol2006674812610.1016/j.urology.2005.10.020

3 

J. M. Soucie R. J. Coates W. McClellan H. Austin M. Thun Relation between Geographic Variability in Kidney Stones Prevalence and Risk Factors for StonesAm J Epidemiol199614354879510.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008769

4 

A Serio A Fraioli Epidemiology of NephrolithiasisNephron1999811263010.1159/000046295

5 

L C Kit G Filler J Pike M P Leonard Pediatric urolithiasis: Experience at a tertiary care pediatric hospitalCan Urol Assoc J200823817

6 

P K Pietrow Pope Jct M C Adams Y Shyr J W Brock 3rd Clinical outcome of pediatric stone diseaseJ Urol20021676703

7 

H Alpay A Ozen I Gokce N Biyikli Clinical and metabolic features of urolithiasis and microlithiasis in childrenPediatr Nephrol200924112203910.1007/s00467-009-1231-9

8 

K Sternberg SP Greenfield P Williot J Wan Pediatric stone disease: An evolving experienceJ Urol20051744 Part 21711410.1097/01.ju.0000179537.36472.59

9 

JA Nicoletta MB Lande Medical Evaluation and Treatment of UrolithiasisPediatr Clin North Am20065334799110.1016/j.pcl.2006.03.001

10 

K VanDervoort J Wiesen R Frank S Vento V Crosby M Chandra Urolithiasis in Pediatric Patients: A Single Center Study of Incidence, Clinical Presentation and OutcomeJ Urol200717762300510.1016/j.juro.2007.02.002

11 

DS Milliner ME Murphy Urolithiasis in Pediatric PatientsMayo Clin Proc1993683241810.1016/s0025-6196(12)60043-3

12 

JK Lattimer RN Miriam Hubbard Pediatric Urglogical AdmissionsJ Urol19516622899310.1016/s0022-5347(17)74341-8

13 

H.N. Bass B. Emanuel Nephrolithiasis in ChildhoodJ Urol19669567495310.1016/s0022-5347(17)63533-x

14 

CW Troup CC Lawnicki RB Bourne NB Hodgson Renal Calculus in ChildrenJ Urol19721072306710.1016/s0022-5347(17)61011-5

15 

A Trinchieri Epidemiology of urolithiasisArch Ital Urol Androl19966820349

16 

DS Goldfarb ME Fischer Y Keich J Goldberg A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: A report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) RegistryKidney Int200567310536110.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x

17 

I D Davis E D Avner R E Behrman R M Kliegman H B Jenson Nelson textbook of Pediatrics17th Edn.Philadelphia, Saunders2004182225

18 

P C Walther D Lamm G W Kaplan Pediatric urolithiases: a ten-year reviewPediatr198065106872

19 

DS Milliner ME Murphy Urolithiasis in Pediatric PatientsMayo Clin Proc1993683241810.1016/s0025-6196(12)60043-3

20 

H Alpay A Ozen I Gokce N Biyikli Clinical and metabolic features of urolithiasis and microlithiasis in childrenPediatr Nephrol200924112203910.1007/s00467-009-1231-9

21 

M Biociζ M Saraga A C Kuzmiζ Z Bahtijareviζ D Budimir J Todoriζ Pediatricurolithiasis in CroatiaColl Antropol20032774552

22 

A Tefekli T Esen O Ziylan B Erol A Armagan H Ander Metabolic Risk Factors in Pediatric and Adult Calcium Oxalate Urinary Stone Formers: Is There Any Difference?Urol Int2003704273710.1159/000070134

23 

P R Larsen Williams Textbook of Endocrinology10th Edn.Philadelphia: Saunders2003

24 

A S Dusso A J Brown Slatopolsky E. Vitamin DAm J Physiol Renal Physiol2005289F8F28

25 

B L Craven C Passman D G Assimos Hypercalcemic States Associated With NephrolithiasisRev Urol200810321826

26 

L Borghi T Schianchi T Meschi A Guerra F Allegri U Maggiore Comparison of Two Diets for the Prevention of Recurrent Stones in Idiopathic HypercalciuriaN Engl J Med20023462778410.1056/nejmoa010369

27 

L Borghi T Meschi F Amato A Briganti A Novarini A Giannini Urinary Volume, Water and Recurrences in Idiopathic Calcium Nephrolithiasis: A 5-year Randomized Prospective StudyJ Urol199615538394310.1016/s0022-5347(01)66321-3

28 

M Naseri A R Varasteh S A Alamdaran Metabolic factors associated with urinary calculi in childrenIran J Kidney Dis201041328

29 

A Erbagci A B Erbagci M Yilmaz Pediatric urolithiasis-evaluation of risk factors in 95 childrenScand J Urol Nephrol200337212933



jats-html.xsl

© 2020 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)