Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 272

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 580


Kishore, Ahmar, Kumar, Kumar, Gupta, Gupta, Kumar, Sharan, and Prakash: Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of neonatal sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care medical institute of Eastern India: A retrospective cross-sectional study


Introduction

Neonatal sepsis is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in newborns.1 It is defined as any sepsis diagnosed during the first 28 days of life and further sub-classified as early-onset neonatal sepsis if clinical features of sepsis appeared within the first 72 of life and late-onset sepsis if clinical features of sepsis are presented after 72 hrs of age.2 In a global scenario sepsis incidence of newborns varies between 1- 10 cases per 1000 live births, and the mortality varies between 15-50%.3 Despite recent advances in the molecular diagnosis of bacterial and fungal sepsis, blood cultures still the mainstay of investigation of sepsis in infants and children.4 Over the recent few years, multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) have been budding as important pathogens that cause sepsis in the NICU, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae.5 The clinical features of neonatal sepsis are very much nonspecific and subtle, which makes early diagnosis difficult and which allows a high rate of empiric antibiotic utilization that could contribute to the spread of antimicrobial-resistant strains of bacteria. After the knowledge of causative agents of neonatal sepsis and their antimicrobial sensitivity patterns, we can choose appropriate therapy for neonatal sepsis. Appropriate antibiotic therapy according to sensitivity pattern plays a major role in the reduction of antimicrobial resistance.6, 7

The objective of this study was to know the prevalence and etiology of neonatal sepsis and to provide antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in the neonatal intensive care unit of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna.

Materials and Methods

Neonates admitted to the NICU of Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences Patna between Feb16, 2019, and Feb 15, 2020, with clinical features of sepsis and who had a positive blood culture were retrospectively analyzed. Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences is an apex centre for medical care in Bihar. Here the super-specialty department is running and doing well for 20 years. Pediatric is a budding department here and we recently started our well-equipped NICU one year before.

One hundred and sixty-eight cases of suspected neonatal sepsis were enrolled at the neonatal intensive care unit of IGIMS, Patna. Sepsis was assumed in the presence of lethargy, feeding intolerance, temperature instability, respiratory distress, hemodynamic instability, seizure, hypotonia, bleeding diathesis, low birth weight (< 2500 g), history of bag-mask ventilation, rupture of amniotic membrane for more than 18 h (PROM), increased capillary refill time >3 sec, antepartum fever, foul-smelling liquor and repeated (≥3) unclean per vaginal examinations were considered as risk factors for neonatal sepsis. Neonates already on antibiotics, Major congenital anomalies, surgical cases, Refusal of informed consent by parents for blood draws are excluded from the study.

A blood sample was collected for culture from each neonate immediately after enrolment and before initiation of antibiotics. Blood culture sample included a single sample collected from a peripheral vein or artery under aseptic conditions. The local site was cleansed with 70% alcohol and povidone-iodine (1%), followed by 70%alcohol again. About 2ml of blood was inoculated into BacT/ALERT® PF Culture Bottles and processed using the BacT/ALERT® 3D 240 Microbial Detection System. The machine works on calorimetric technology. Antimicrobial neutralization resins were added in the bottles which help to minimize the false-negative results. Positively identified bottles were subjected to gram’s stained and subculture on 5%sheep blood agar, chocolate agar and, Mac Conkey agar plates and put for overnight incubation at 370 C.

Antibiotic sensitivity testing was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) plates by the modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method as per the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines 2016.8 The drugs for disc diffusion testing were in the following concentrations: Ampicillin (30μg), Amoxycillin Clavulanic acid (20/10μg), Piperacillin/Tazobactum (100/10μg), Imipenem (10μg), Meropenem (10μg) Tobramycin (30μg) Teigecyclin (10μg), Gentamycin (10μg), Ciprofloxacin (5μg), Levofloxacin (5μg), Co-trimoxazole (25μg-1·25 μg trimethoprim/23·75 μg sulfamethoxazole), Cefotaxime (30μg), Ceftazidime (30μg), Colistin (10μg), Penicillin (10 Unit), Cefoxitin (30μg), Erythromycin (15μg), Linezolid (30μg), Vancomycin (30μg), Clindamycin (02μg), Novobiocin (30μg), Piperacillin (100μg), Amikacin (30μg).

After getting blood culture, empiric antibiotics Ampicillin, and Amikacin (first-line therapy) are intravenously started according to our NICU protocol. If there is no clinical response after 72h, antibiotics are upgraded to intravenous Cefotaxime and vancomycin (second line) or Meropenem and Colistin (third line).when the blood culture reports came we select antibiotics according to culture report.EOS is defined as the onset of clinical features of infection within 72 h of life and the LOS, clinical features present after 72 h of life.2, 9 As per international standard definitions, multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains were defined for acquired resistance and relative to the panel of antibiotics tested for each isolate, as in vitro non-susceptibility to ≥1 agent in ≥3 antimicrobial categories: Penicillins, Cephalosporins, Beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, Fluoroquinolones, Aminoglycosides, Chloramphenicol, Folate pathway inhibitors, Tetracyclines, Macrolides and Glycopeptides. 10

Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.0. Microbiology laboratory blood culture registers were reviewed and all blood culture positive neonates were identified. The level of significance for tests was set at P < 0.05. Microsoft Excel was used for totaling, percentage, and frequency.

Results

A total of 168 newborns with clinical sepsis were admitted during the study duration. Blood culture reports were positive in 60 cases (35.71%). Among the culture-positive cases, there were 34(56%) male and 26(44%) female neonates, with the male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Late-onset sepsis (LOS) cases were found to be higher than Early-onset sepsis (EOS). Out of 60 culture-positive cases, 34(56%) had Late-onset sepsis and 26(44%) had Early-onset sepsis (EOS). Among the neonate birth weight, less than 2500 g is found in (40) %. In the EOS group, majority are preterm neonates which are 73%. Thirty percent had a maternal history of PROM which was common among the EOS group.

General characteristics of newborn shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Showing General Characteristics of newborns

Variable

EOS group (n-26)

LOS group (n-34)

Total

Percent

Gender

Neonatal parameters

Male

16

18

34

56

Female

10

16

26

44

Gestational age

Preterm (<37 weeks)

19

08

27

45

Term (>37 weeks)

07

26

33

55

Birth weight

< 2500 g

16

08

24

40

≥ 2500 g

10

26

36

60

Mode of delivery

Per Vaginal

17

21

38

63

Caesarean section

09

13

22

36

Maternal parameters

History of Maternal fever

04

02

06

10

Rupture of membrane >18 h

12

06

18

30

Foul smelling liquor

02

00

02

03

Neonatal-care-related parameters

Ionotropic support

17

13

30

50

positive pressure ventilation

21

12

33

55

Central line

14

08

22

36

Out of 60 blood culture-positive cases Gram-negative bacilli (19/60, 31.6%), Gram-positive cocci (34/60, 56.6%) and yeast-like fungi (7/60, 11.6%). Klebsiella spp. and Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were the most common Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms. The most common organisms isolated from blood cultures were Coagulase-negative staphylococci [Co NS] (18/60, 30%), Staphylococcus aureus (13/60, 21.6%), Klebsiella spp. (12/60, 18%), and yeast-like fungi (7/60, 11.6%) (Table-2).

Table 2

Etiological agents are isolated from different types of neonatal sepsis.

Etiological agents

Isolated fromEOS cases

Isolated from LOS cases

Total No.

Gram-Positive Organism

Staphylococcus aureus

06

07

13

Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

06

12

18

Enterococcus spp.

01

02

03

Yeast like fungi

02

05

07

Gram-Negative Organism(GNB)

Escherichia coli

01

01

02

Klebsiella spp.

08

04

12

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

0

01

01

Proteus mirabilis

01

0

01

Citrobacter spp.

01

0

01

Acinetobacter baumannii

0

02

02

Total isolates

26

34

60

Klebsiella spp. was the most common cause of early-onset sepsis (8/26, 30.7%) and CoNS was the most common cause of late-onset sepsis (n= 12/34; 35%).

Among GNB isolates Klebsiella spp. were predominant (12/19, 63%) followed by Escherichia coli (2/19, 10.5%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (2/19, 10.5%). Escherichia coli was distributed equally among EOS and LOS. All the Acinetobacter baumannii was recovered from LOS. Other GNB isolates were Proteus mirabilis (1/19, 5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1/19, 5%), and Citrobacter spp. (1/19, 5%). Proteus mirabilis and Citrobacter spp. were isolated from EOS cases while Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from LOS cases. (Table 2)

Antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance patterns were assessed for all 60 isolated bacteria from blood culture. (Table 3) present the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of all gram-negative bacilli isolates excluding Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Multidrug resistance organisms (MDROs) constituted the majority of sepsis episodes after the exclusion of sepsis episodes caused by yeast-like fungi and CoNS, and those included ESBL-PE (extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae Klebsiella spp., E. coli, Citrobacter spp. and Proteus mirabilis) MDR Acinetobacter baumannii, and MRSA.

Gram-negative bacilli showed highest resistance to ampicillin (89.47%), cephalosporins [cefotaxime (84%), ceftazidime (79%)], fluoroquinolones [levofloxacin (74%), ciprofloxacin (69%)], amoxicillin-clavulanate (63%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (63%). Less resistance was evident to carbapenems (imipenem 42% and meropenem (42%) and tigecycline (37%). All the GNB isolates were 100% sensitive to colistin (Table 3).

Table 3

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of GNB isolates excluding Pseudomonas spp.

Antibiotics

Sensitive (%) n-19

Resistant (%) n-19

Ampicillin

02 (10.5%)

17 (89.47%)

Gentamycin

07 (36.8%)

12 (63%)

Ciprofloxacin

06 (21%)

13 (69%)

Levofloxacin

05 (26%)

14 (74%)

Cotrimoxazole

06 (31.5%)

13 (68.5%)

Cefotaxime

03 (16%)

16 (84%)

Ceftazidime

04 (21%)

15 (79%)

Amoxycillin-Clavulanate

07 (37%)

12 (63%)

Piperacillin-Tazobactum

07 (37%)

12 (63%)

Imipenem

11 (58%)

08 (42%)

Meropenem

11 (58%)

08 (42%)   

Tobramycin

08 (42%)

11 (58%)

Tigecyclin

12 (63%)

07 (37%)

Colistin

19 (100%)

00

Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed a good antibiotic sensitivity pattern with resistance to aminoglycosides only. Amongst the Gram-positive cocci (n=34) Staphylococcus aureus (13/34, 38%) was the predominant pathogens following CoNS. and was distributed more or less equally among EOS (n=6) and LOS (n=7). Among Gram-positive pathogens, methicillin resistance was detected in 44% (n=8/18) of coagulase-negative staphylococci and 62% (n=8/13) of Staphylococcus aureus. The majority of the coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus showed good sensitivity to amikacin and all the isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and enterococci isolates were susceptible to vancomycin. A high proportion of GNB isolates were multidrug-resistant. Table 4 shows the comparative antibiotic sensitivity pattern of ESBL and non-ESBL producers.

Table 4

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of ESBL-PE & non-ESBL-PE.

ESBL Producers (n=09)

Non-ESBL (n=05)

Producers

Antibiotics

Sensitive (%)

Resistant (%)

Sensitive (%)

Resistant (%)

Ampicillin

0

09 (100%)

01 (20%)

04 (80%)

Gentamycin

02 (22%)

07 (78%)

03 (60%)

02 (40%)

Levofloxacin

02 (22%)

07 (78%)

01 (20%)

04 (80%)

Ciprofloxacin

02 (22%)

07 (78%)

01 (20%)

04 (80%)

Cefotaxime

0

09 (100%)

02 (40%)

03 (60%)

Ceftazidime

0

09 (100%)

02 (40%)

03 (60%)

Cotrimoxazole

01 (11%)

08 (89%)

03 (60%)

02 (40%)

Amoxyclav

03 (33%)

06 (67%)

02 (40%)

03 (60%)

Piperacillin tazobactun

02 (22%)

08 (78%)

03 (60%)

02 (40%)

Imipenem

06 (67%)

03 (33%)

03 (60%)

02 (40%)

Meropenem

06 (67%)

03 (33%)

03 (60%)

02 (40%)

Tobramycin

02 (22%)

07 (78%)

04 (80%)

01 (20%)

Tigecyclin

05 (56%)

04 (44%)

04 (80%)

01 (20%)

Colistin

09 (100%)

0

05 (100%)

0

Discussion

Neonatal septicemia is considered the leading cause of infant mortality and morbidity in the NICU. There has been a wide variation in the growth positivity in India; it has ranged from 16% to 54%.11 Our study, conducted in the NICU of the Indira Gandhi Institute of medical sciences, showed culture positivity of neonatal sepsis to be 35.71%. A reasonably comparable rate of 31.5% was observed by Ashish Khanna et al.12 Similar studies conducted by Lakhey and Shreshtha et al showed culture positivity to be 48 and 44.9% respectively.13, 14 Differences in culture-techniques and study designs are the cause of variations in the culture positivity rate of neonatal sepsis in different studies.

The male predominance is more than female because of the higher proportion of males included in the study. In our study, it was found that late-onset neonatal sepsis 56 % was more common as compared to early-onset neonatal sepsis which was found to be 44 %. Similar data were reported in a study, which reported late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) to be 51% as compared to early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) of 49%.15 Even studies from other Asian countries such as China16 and Korea17 have shown a predominance of late-onset sepsis. Common clinical presentation recorded in our study was fever, respiratory distress/asphyxia/pneumonia, tachycardia, neonatal jaundice, and Lethargy and or poor cry. Our study has shown a preponderance of Gram-positive cocci (56.6%) among all culture-positive neonatal sepsis cases as compared to Gram-negative bacilli (31.6%) and yeast-like fungi (10.71%). This is in line with the study conducted by Thakur et al in 2016 that reported 60% and 40% of the isolates to be Gram-positive and Gram-negative respectively.15 With regards to the etiological agents of neonatal sepsis, Staphylococcus aureus 38% (n=13/34) and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) 52.9% (n=18/34) were found to be the most frequently isolated Gram-positive organism which is quite similar as compared to a study conducted by Kumar R et al in Bihar.18 CoNS has been reported in various studies as the most common cause of neonatal sepsis in NICUs. 19, 20 The colonization of the skin and nasopharynx by CoNS and S. aureus in health care workers, the invasive procedures, lack of disinfection practice may lead to the transmission of Gram-positive organisms to neonates. In the present study, Klebsiella spp. 63.1% (n=12/19), Escherichia coli 10.5% (n=2/19) and Acinetobacter spp. 10.5% (n=2/19) were the most common Gram-negative isolates. This is similar to the findings reported by Khanna et al. They found in their study the Klebsiella spp. as a predominant pathogen (20.2%) followed by Escherichia coli (14.6%).12 Resistance to cephalosporins among Acinetobacter baumanni was neither attributed to ESBL production nor AmpC beta-lactamase production but was attributed to some other mechanism of drug resistance. 21, 22

In our study, up to 100% resistance against 3rd generation cephalosporins was observed among the ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae. This outcome is in agreement with the study done by Islam et al which reported all ESBL positive strains of E. coli were resistant to cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone.23 We observed colistin (100% sensitive) as the most sensitive drug (in agreement with the study done by Islam et al)23 followed by tigecycline (63% sensitive) and carbapenem [60% sensitive (imipenem and meropenem)]. Resistance of ESBL-positive strains to piperacillin-tazobactam (78%), aminoglycosides [gentamycin (78%), tobramycin (78%)], quinolones [levofloxacin (78%), ciprofloxacin (78%)], cotrimoxazole (89%) and cephalosporins [cefotaxime (100%), ceftazidime (78%)] was significantly higher than that of ESBL-negative ones (p < 0.05). This outcome is concordant with the study done by Paterson et al in 2005 and Bush et al in 2011.24, 25 ESBL-producing strains appeared susceptible to carbapenem [meropenem (67%), imipenem (67%)]. The current study reported high resistance against ampicillin (100%) and cotrimoxazole (89%) among the ESBL producing isolates. A similar finding has been reported from Benin in 2015, they reported the most effective antibiotics as imipenem (96.4% sensitive) and gentamicin (54.8% sensitive). High resistance was seen among ampicillin (94%) and cotrimoxazole (85.7%).26 The resistance among imipenem might be due to Metallo-beta-lactamase producers. Tigecycline resistance was detected in 35% (n=6/17) Gram-negative isolates. In our study cesarean delivery is a risk factor of ESBL-PE acquisition which is concordant with other studies on ESBL-PE infection or carriage. 24, 25 Cesarean delivery in the hospital is more at risk suggesting handling by health personnel and have generally longer stay in hospital might increase the risk of acquiring ESBL-PE. During cesarean section lack of contact with the maternal vaginal and intestinal flora deprives newborns of maternal vaginal and gut flora exposure and may influence the newborn microbiome development. 27, 28

The retrospective design, small study population, single centered, and limited yield of some pathogens were the limitations of our study. This study showed more incidence of coagulase-negative staphylococci; because its diagnosis was not based on two simultaneous blood cultures also they are commensals of the mucosa and skin in humans and animals. However, we followed strict protocol-driven practices for skin preparation before obtaining blood culture specimens, and the diagnosis of sepsis caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) was made only after a detailed review of the clinical course. Therefore large-scale, multi-centre prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Conclusions

In this study, Gram-positive cocci predominated being responsible for (34 out of 60) 56.6 % of cases of septicemia in which culture was positive. The percentage of CoNS 52.9% was higher among GPC followed by Staphylococcus aureus. All the MRSA, Enterococcus spp. and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci 100% sensitive to vancomycin. The majority of septic neonates are colonized by ESBL producing GNB and among those colonized with strains secreting ESBL enzymes; the majority was shown to be colonized by ESBL producing strains of Klebsiella spp. Majority of neonatal sepsis case was caused by MDR gram-negative bacilli. It is also concluded that indiscriminate use of third-generation cephalosporins, preterm low birth weight, prolonged mechanical ventilation (≥ 7 days) may be responsible for the selection of ESBL-producing multi-drug resistant strains in the neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU). Simple hygienic measures, such as hand washing practices, the use of sterile equipment, patient cohorts (i.e. grouping patients with similar infections in the same location), and screening of attending staff and mothers for MRSA and ESBL can help prevent the further spread of these resistant strains.

There is a need to improve and emphasize infection control interventions and antimicrobial stewardship because these are cheap inexpensive strategies to control the increase of multi-resistant gram-negative bacteria.

Source of Funding

No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

1 

A Schuchat SS Zywicki MJ Dinsmoor B Mercer J Romaguera MJ O'Sullivan Risk Factors and Opportunities for Prevention of Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis: A Multicenter Case-Control StudyPediatrics2000105121610.1542/peds.105.1.21

2 

S Vergnano Neonatal sepsis: an international perspectiveArch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed2005903220410.1136/adc.2002.022863

3 

C Fleischmann-Struzek DM Goldfarb P Schlattmann LJ Schlapbach K Reinhart N Kissoon The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic reviewLancet Respir2018632233010.1016/s2213-2600(18)30063-8

4 

C. E. Corless M. Guiver R. Borrow V. Edwards-Jones A. J. Fox E. B. Kaczmarski Simultaneous Detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in Suspected Cases of Meningitis and Septicemia Using Real-Time PCRJ Clin Microbiol20013941553810.1128/jcm.39.4.1553-1558.2001

5 

D Thaver AKM Zaidi he burden of neonatal infections in developing countries: a review of evidence from community-based studiesPediatr Infect Dis J200928139

6 

S Vergnano M Sharland P Kazembe C Mwansambo Neonatal sepsis: an international perspectiveArch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed2005903220410.1136/adc.2002.022863

7 

PZ Bambala V Bhat BN Harish TA Babu NM Joseph Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: Bacteriological Profile and Antibiotic Sensitivity PatternIndian J Pediatr201010515

8 

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty Sixth Informational Supplement M100-SWayne, PA, USA: CLSI2016

9 

National Neonatology Forum NNPD Network, India. National neonatal perinatal database report 2002–2003New Delhi: National Neonatology Forum NNPD Network, India2005

10 

AK Labi N Obeng-Nkrumah S Bjerrum CE Laryea MJ Newman Neonatal bloodstream infections in a Ghanaian Tertiary Hospital: Are the current antibiotic recommendations adequate?BMC Infect Dis201616159810.1186/s12879-016-1913-4

11 

Y R Bhat L E Lewis K E Vandana Bacterial isolates of early-onset neonatal sepsis and their antibiotics susceptibility pattern betweenItal J Pediatr199810.1186/1824-7288-37-32

12 

A Khanna M Khanna M Gill ESBL Producing Gram Negative Bacteria-A Cause of Concern in Neonatal Septicemia in a Tertiary Care HospitalInt J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci20165108071310.20546/ijcmas.2016.510.087

13 

A Lakhey H Shakya Role of Sepsis Screening in early diagnosis of Neonatal SepsisJ Pathol Nepal20177111031010.3126/jpn.v7i1.16944

14 

N J Shrestha K U Subedi G K Rai Bacteriological profile of neonatal sepsis: a hospital based studyJ Nepal Paediatr Soc201131115

15 

S Thakur K Thakur A Sood S Chaudhary Bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of neonatal septicaemia in a rural tertiary care hospital in North IndiaIndian J Med Microbiol2016341677110.4103/0255-0857.174108

16 

A Al-Taiar MS Hammoud L Cuiqing JKF Lee L Kin-Man N Nakwan Neonatal infections in China, Malaysia, Hong Kong and ThailandArch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed20139832495510.1136/archdischild-2012-301767

17 

G H Shim S D Kim H S Kim Trends in the epidemiology of neonatal sepsis in a tertiary centre in Korea: a 26-year longitudinal analysisJ Korean Med Sci1980262849

18 

R Kumar A Kumari A Kumari N Verma Evaluation of perinatal factors in neonatal sepsis at tertiary centreInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 20176114981510.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175012

19 

J H Wu C Y Chen P N Tsao W S Hsieh H C Chou Neonatal sepsis: a 6-year analysis in a neonatal care unit in TaiwanPediatr Neonatol201738895

20 

Bonny Jasani Sridharan Kannan Ruchi Nanavati NithyaJ Gogtay Urmila Thatte An audit of colistin use in neonatal sepsis from a tertiary care centre of a resource-limited countryIndian Journal of Medical Research201614434334330971-591610.4103/0971-5916.198682Medknowhttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.198682

21 

ArpitaJigar Shah SummaiyaA Mulla SangitaB Revdiwala Neonatal sepsis: High antibiotic resistance of the bacterial pathogens in a neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary Care hospitalJournal of Clinical Neonatology20121272722249-484710.4103/2249-4847.96753Medknowhttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4847.96753

22 

C R Lee J H Lee M Park Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms, and Prospective Treatment OptionsFront Cell Infect Microbiol201775555

23 

MS Islam MA Yusuf MB Islam WA Jahan Frequency of ESBL in Surgical Site Infection at a Tertiary Care HospitalJ Curr Adv Med Res20141225910.3329/jcamr.v1i2.20514

24 

DL Paterson RA Bonomo Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases: a Clinical UpdateClin Microbiol Rev20051846578610.1128/cmr.18.4.657-686.2005

25 

K Bush JF Fisher Epidemiological Expansion, Structural Studies, and Clinical Challenges of New β-Lactamases from Gram-Negative BacteriaAnnu Rev Microbiol20116514557810.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102911

26 

E Anago L Ayi-Fanou CD Akpovi WB Hounkpe M Agassounon-Djikpo Tchibozo HS Bankole Antibiotic resistance and genotype of beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in nosocomial infections in Cotonou, BeninAnn Clin Microbiol Antimicrob2015141510.1186/s12941-014-0061-1

27 

NT Mueller E Bakacs J Combellick Z Grigoryan Maria G. Dominguez-Bello The infant microbiome development: mom mattersTrends Mol Med 20152121091710.1016/j.molmed.2014.12.002

28 

M. G. Dominguez-Bello E. K. Costello M. Contreras M. Magris G. Hidalgo N. Fierer Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newbornsProc Natl Acad Sci U S A20101072611971510.1073/pnas.1002601107



jats-html.xsl

© 2021 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)