Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 299

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 632


Kumar, Kumar, Rao, Kumar, and Venkateswarlu: A clinical study of surgical management of tendoachilles rupture by various modalities


Introduction

The Achilles tendon formed by tendinous contributions from Gastrocnemius and soleus, is the largest and strongest tendon in the body. It resists forces up to 2.6kN, but in spite of its tensile strength, it frequently gets injured. The loss of tendon leads to poor push off. It plays a crucial role in the bipedal human beings.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Achilles Tendon rupture are the most common tendon rupture of lower extremity. Etiology of tendon injury is multifactorial.75% of all the injuries occur during sporting (racquet sports dominates) Given the broad array of critical functions that it helps to provide, injury to Achilles Tendon can be devastating. The profound disabilities like weak plantar flexion with deficit push off and flat foot gait will alter the energy expenditure. Also flat foot leads to foot strain and tarsal arthritis. Treatment of Achilles tendon rupture was first reported in literature by Ambrose Pare in 1575. The primary goals of the management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures are to ensure a rapid return to full function and to prevent complications.

These are minimized by: following strict asepsis, atraumatic technique, use of less irritant suture material, and with meticulous soft tissue handling.6, 7, 8

Aims and objectives of the study

To study the results of surgical management of Tendo Achilles rupture

  1. Time required for healing of ruptured Achilles tendon.

  2. Range of plantar flexion of foot.

  3. Rate of delayed healing or Re-rupture.

  4. Rate of functional deficit and chronic pain.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective study, 21 patients, who attended the OPD and emergency room of MGM Hospital (affiliated to Kakatiya medical college) Warangal, and diagnosed as Tendo Achilles rupture were admitted and included in this study done between June 2019 to Dec 2020.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the cause, the clinical course, surgical management and functional outcomes of injury to Tendo Achilles.

Study included 15 males, 6 females with acute, neglected and compound Tendo Achilles rupture. The rupture was classified as early when rupture is less than 4 weeks and delayed when rupture is more than 4 weeks.

Typically patient present with pain, struck from behind, popping sound and inability to walk. Signs of ruptured tendon include limping, altered gait, palpable gap in the continuity of the tendon, plantar flexion weakness.

Diagnosis

According to the AAOS clinical practice guidelines, the diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon rupture is established by two or more of the following physical examination test:

  1. Positive Thompson’s test.

  2. Decreased plantar flexion strength.

  3. Presence of a palpable gap.

  4. Increased passive ankle dorsiflexion with gentle manipulation.

Other tests in vogue include Matles test, O Brien‘s needle test.

Imaging

Diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon rupture is primarily clinical, supported by imaging tests

Plain X-ray of the ankle with leg (lateral view) is taken to study for calcaneal exostosis, calcification and avulsed tendon and to rule out other ankle problems.

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography examination of heel is done to note the quality, integrity of tendon fibres, hematoma, calcification and Gap.

Pre-operative instructions

The patient is explained about surgery, post-operative protocol and rehabilitation and taken up to surgery. Routine blood investigations are performed for preparation of anesthesia.

Surgical steps of Raghuram et al technique

Figure 1

a: Surgical steps in Tendo Achilles repair; a: Surgical incision; b: Exposed parts; c: Isolated aponeurosis; d: Making aponeurosis into cord; e: Making hole in calcaneum; f: Passing cord through calcaneum; g: Suturing to proximal part

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/1e04b427-5ff9-46cd-8fa9-4b3b416b6778image1.png

Surgical procedures

Surgical technique we have followed depending on type of injuries whether injury is compound or simple, rupture is acute or neglected.

At the time of surgery after the preparation, the patient is put in prone position. The incision is posterior central with slight medial deviation at the calcaneal tuberosity.

The tendon is studied for the level of rupture, the length of distal stump and the gap in the tendon is noted. Tendon ends are freshened and mobilized.

In 15 tendon rupture cases, end to end repair with Krackow sutures is done. In 4 cases, tendon repair is done with Raghuram technique with aponeurosis taken and passed through calcaneum and in remaining two cases repair was done through pull through technique.

After repair of tendon the paratenon surrounding the Achilles tendon is repaired and the wound is closed in layers. Sterile dressing is applied, a short leg cast with foot in 200 plantar flexion is applied.

Post-operative management

In the immediate post operative period, the patient is administered parenteral broad spectrum antibiotics and analgesics. Periodic wound inspection is done through the window in the cast. Sutures are removed between 12th -14th post operative day. Limb is immobilized in B/K (Below Knee) cast for a maximum duration of 3 weeks.

Figure 2

Preoperative clinical photo

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/1e04b427-5ff9-46cd-8fa9-4b3b416b6778image2.png
Figure 3

Postoperative clinical photograph

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/1e04b427-5ff9-46cd-8fa9-4b3b416b6778image3.png

Follow up protocol: patients were instructed at the time of discharge to review at OPD every 1 month for initial 3 months, and thereafter every 3 months for a period of 18 months. Functional outcomes were evaluated using leppilahti score. 9

Table 1

Leppilahti score

Clinical factor

Points

Pain

15

None

10

Mild, no limitations in recreational activities

5

Moderate, limitations in recreational, but not daily activities 5

0

Severe, limitations in recreational and daily activities

Stiffness

15

None

10

Moderate, limitations in recreational, but not daily activities 5

5

Severe, limitations in recreational and daily activities

0

Calf muscle weakness

None

15

Mild, no limitations in recreational activities

10

Moderate, limitations in recreational, but not daily activities

5

Severe, limitations in recreational and daily activities

0

Footwear restrictions

None

10

Mild, most shoes tolerated

5

Moderate, unable to tolerate fashionable shoes, modified shoes tolerated 0

0

Active range of motion difference between ankles

Normal (<6 degrees)

15

Mild (6 to 10 degrees)

10

Moderate (11 to 15 degrees)

5

Severe (>15 degrees)

0

Subjective results

Very satisfied

15

Satisfied with minor reservations

10

Satisfied with major reservations

5

Dissatisfied

0

Isokinetic muscle strength (score)

Excellent

15

Good

10

Fair

5

Poor

0

Leppilahti score

Excellent

90-100

Good

75-89

Fair

60-74

Poor

<60

Results

Total number of patients with rupture studied were 21

Duration of study

June 2019 to Dec 2020

Table 2

Sex incidence

Sex

No. of cases

Percentage

Males

16

76.19

Females

5

23.81

Table 3

Age incidence:

Age

No. of cases

Percentage

21-30

6

28.57

31-40

6

28.57

41-50

4

19.04

51-60

2

9.52

61-70

3

14.28

Table 4

Aetiology

Aetiology

No. of cases

Percentage

Stepping into commode hole

10

47.61

Blunt and penetrating injury

4

19.04

Trivial trauma

7

33.33

Table 5

Clinical evaluation

Clinical features

No. of cases

Percentage

Skin changes

4

19.04

>20% difference in calf measurement

6

28.57

>3cm palpable Gap in tendon

5

23.80

Weakness of plantar flexion

18

85.71

Table 6

Site of Rupture:

Zone

No. of cases

Percentage

Zone 1

6

28.57

Zone 2

14

66.66

Zone 3

1

4.76

Table 7

Complications:

Complications

No. of cases

Percentage

Wound dehiscence

1

4.76

Infection

3

14.28

Scar hypertrophy

2

9.52

Table 8

8: Functional outcomes (Leppilahati score)

Functional outcome

No. of cases

Percentage

Excellent

14

66.66

Good

4

19.04

Fair

1

4.76

Poor

2

9.52

Discussion

In our series, majority of cases were seen in age group of 21-40 years. There are 2 patients in age group between 51-60 years and 3 patients in >61 years age group.

Number of males were 16 (76.19%) and females were 5 (23.80%). The most common cause that led to Tendo Achilles rupture in our series was sudden forceful dorsiflexion at ankle due to stepping into the commode followed by trivial trauma in 7 (33.33%) patients.

There were 7 cases of rupture due to trivial trauma above 40 years age group without any history of local steroid injection.

In our study, there were 13 cases of compound Tendo Achilles rupture, of which 10 cases were due to stepping into the commode hole and 2 cases were due to road traffic accident and 1 due to sharp instrument injury.

In our series, 15 cases presented within 4 weeks of trauma and 6 cases presented after 4 weeks. According to Allen et al,10 it was called early repair when presented before 4 weeks.

Most patients complained of pain and disturbances in gait which was mainly due to inability to plantar flex during gait cycle.

Thompson Test was positive in almost all cases but it loses its efficacy after one week because plantar flexion may result from other plantar flexors or bridging fibrous tissue. There was difference in calf muscle measurement after prolonged period due to relative inactivity of gastrosoleus. Weakness of plantar flexion was seen in almost all cases due to absence of gastrosoleus action.11, 12, 13, 14

In our series, rupture are more commonly (66.66%) seen in zone 2 (Lindholm).

In patients, who presented to the hospital more than 4 weeks after the injury, we have repaired with Raghuram technique.

Among all the complications there was no re-rupture till date. There was increased incidence of infection and delayed wound healing in distal part of the wound. This was due to inadequate paratenon closure and increased plantar flexion postoperatively, which resulted in crumpling of skin which leads to delayed wound healing.14

We achieved good to excellent results in 86% patients with surgical repair in all types of ruptures.

Conclusion

Primary surgical management if done well produces good functional outcome without any functional deficit and chronic pain. Raghuram et al technique is safe and good method for chronic ruptures. Post operative evaluation is necessary in assessing final outcome including ultrasound and dynamometric studies.

Acknowledgment

The author is thankful to Department of Orthopaedics for providing all the facilities to carry out this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this paper.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

M Diab Lexicon of Orthopaedic EtymologyHarwood Academic PublishersSingapore1999

2 

J Kirkup Chapter B Helal D Wilson Mythology and historyThe FootEdinburgh: Churchill Livingstone1999

3 

A Pare Workes. (Translated by T. Johnstone.)London1665

4 

The Workes of that Famous Chirurgion Ambrose Parey. (Translated out of Latin and compared with the French byTLondon: Richard Cotes1649

5 

O Arner A Lindholm Subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon; a study of 92 casesActa Chir Scand Suppl1959116239151

6 

J Leppilahti Achilles tendon rupture with special reference to epidemiology and results of surgery. Thesis, University Oulu, Finlandof Oulu1996

7 

N Maffulli Rupture of the Achilles tendonJ Bone Joint Surg Am199981710193610.2106/00004623-199907000-00017

8 

S J Hattrup K A John Son A review of ruptures of the Achilles tendonFoot Ankle19856134810.1177/107110078500600107

9 

J Leppilahti J Puranen S Orava Incidence of Achilles tendon ruptureActa Orthop Scand1996673277910.3109/17453679608994688

10 

E Allen J L Turk R Murley The Case Books of John Hunter FRS. London: Royal Society of Medicine Services Limited1993

11 

Q J Stoïanovich Les ruptures du tendon AchilleRev de Chirurg19296764778

12 

H Platt Observations on some tendon rupturesBr Med1931136666115

13 

G H Lawrence E F Cave H O’Connor Injury to theAchilles’ tendonAm J Surg1955894795802 10.1016/0002-9610(55)90146-x

14 

F A Simmonds The diagnosis of the ruptured Achilles tendonThe Practitioner19571791069568



jats-html.xsl

© 2021 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)