Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 217

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 960


Barik, Nayak, Misra, and Jain: A study on elective hysterectomies in a Tertiary care hospital


Introduction

Hysterectomy is the surgical removal of uterus done for various benign and malignant conditions. With the emergence of many conservative approaches the indication for hysterectomy should be carefully evaluated as any surgical procedure is associated with risk of complications. Approximately 600,000 hysterectomies are performed annually in the United States. 1 Hysterectomy can be done through abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic approach depending upon indication, nature of the disease, patient’s preference and operative skill of the surgeon. In some cases it is combined with removal of adnexa called Hysterectomy with salpingoophorectomy. Hysterectomy through Vaginal route is less invasive than abdominal hysterectomy and usually indicated in gynaecological disorders for prolapsed uterus. But nowadays vaginal hysterectomies are done for many benign conditions like uterine leiomyoma, adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding with no uterovaginal descent, a term called non-descent vaginal hysterectomy.

Materials and Methods

Present study was carried out in the department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fakir Mohan Medical College & Hospital, Balasore, Odisha, India to find out age distribution, clinical presentation, indications, route of hysterectomy, complications and histopathological study of uterine specimen of patients underwent elective hysterectomies. It is a Hospital based retrospective cross-sectional study done from November 2018 to October 2020 comprising of 200 cases. Institutional Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Cases of elective hysterectomies were identified from hospital records and data were analyzed by using Microsoft Excel.

Results

Data on 200 elective hysterectomies cases were analyzed over a period of two years. Majority of patients i.e. 48% were between age group of 41 to 50 years. Hysterectomy was done at less than 40 years of age in 8.5% cases and at more than 60 years in12 % cases [Table 1].

Table 1

Age distribution of hysterectomy cases

S.No.

Age in Years

No. of Patients

Percentage (%)

1

31 - 40

17

8.5%

2

41 - 50

96

48%

3

51 - 60

63

31.5%

4

>61

24

12%

Total

200

100%

In 59% cases elective hysterectomy was done for fibroid uterus.16% cases for abnormal uterine bleeding, 15% cases for prolapsed uterus, 7% cases for benign ovarian mass and 3% cases for adenomyosis [Table 2].

Table 2

Indications for hysterectomy

S.No.

Indications

No. of Patients

Percentage (%)

1

Fibroid uterus

118

59%

2

Abnormal uterine bleeding

32

16%

3

Prolapsed uterus

30

15%

4

Adenomyosis

6

3%

5

Benign Ovarian mass

14

7%

Total

200

100%

Most common clinical presentation was heavy menstrual bleeding i.e., 52%, mass descending per vaginum 15%, lump per abdomen 14%, dysmenorrhoea13% and postmenopausal bleeding in 6% cases [Table 3].

Table 3

Clinical presentation

S.No.

Complaints

No. of Patients

Percentage (%)

1

Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

104

52%

2

Lump per Abdomen

28

14%

3

Postmenopausal Bleeding

12

6%

4

Dysmenorrhoea

26

13%

 5

Mass Descending per Vaginun

30

15%

Total

200

100%

Majority of cases i.e., 24% were anaemic followed by hypertension in 23% cases. Other co-existing medical conditions were diabetes mellitus 18%, thyroid disorders 12% and Heart disease in 2% cases.[Table 4].

Table 4

Co-existing medical conditions

S.No.

Medical Conditions

No. of Patients

Percentage (%)

1

Anaemia

48

24%

2

Diabetes Mellitus

36

18%

3

Hypertension

46

23%

4

Thyroid disorders

24

12%

5

Heart disease

4

2%

6

No medical disorders

42

21%

Total

200

100%

Abdominal route was preferred in 80% cases. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) done in 25% cases and total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoophorectomy (TAH with BSO) done in 55% cases. Vaginal route was preferred in 20% cases amongst which vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic floor repair (VH with PFR) was performed in 15% cases followed by NDVH (non-descent vaginal hysterectomy) in 5% cases [Table 5].

Table 5

Routesof hysterectomy

S.No.

Route

Type

No. of Patients

Percentage (%)

1

Abdominal

TAH

50

25%

TAH with BSO

110

55%

2

Vaginal

NDVH

10

5%

VH with PFR

30

15%

3

Laparoscopic

TLH

0

0%

LAVH

0

0%

Total

200

100%

In 110 patients (55%) both Ovaries were removed during hysterectomy operation.

Bleeding was the most common intraoperative complication i.e. 3% followed by anaesthetic complications in 2% cases, bladder and ureteric injuries in 0.5% cases each. Post-operative complications were wound gaping in 4% cases, burst abdomen in 1% and urinary tract infection (UTI) in 1% [Table 6].

Table 6

Complications of hysterectomy

S.No.

Complications

Type

No. of Patients

Percentage (%)

1

Intraoperative complications

Bleeding

6

3%

Bowel injury

0

0%

Bladder injury

1

0.5%

Ureteric injury

1

0.5%

Anesthetics complications

4

2%

2

Postoperative Complications

Wound Gaping

8

4%

Burst Abdomen

2

1%

UTI

2

1%

Total

24

12%

Proliferative endometrium was the most common endometrial study finding i.e. 48% followed by secretory endometrium 24%, simple hyperplasia 12%, atrophic changes 6%, complex hyperplasia 2%, endometritis 2%, progestational changes 1.5 % and endometrial carcinoma in 0.5% cases [Table 7].

Table 7

Histopathological changes (Endometrium)

S.No.

Endometrial changes

No of patients

Percentage (%)

1

Proliferative Phase

96

48%

2

Secretary phase

48

24%

3

Atrophic changes

12

6%

4

Simple hyperplasia

24

12%

5

Complex hyperplasia

4

2%

6

Endometrial carcinoma

1

0.5%

7

Progestational changes

3

1.5%

8

Endometritis

4

2%

9

Normal Endometrium

8

4%

10

Total

200

100%

Non specific cervicitis was the most common cervical histopathological finding i.e. 92% followed by papillary endocervicitis 2%, cervical dysplasia 1.5% and adenocarcinoma in 0.5% cases [Table 8].

Table 8

Histopathological changes (Cervix)

S.No.

Cervical Changes

No. of Patients

Percentage (%)

1

Chronic non specific cervicitis

184

92%

2

Cervical dysplasia

3

1.5%

3

Papillary endocervicitis

4

2%

4

Squamous cell carcinoma

0

0%

5

Adenocarcinoma

1

0.5%

6

Normal Cervix

8

4%

Total

200

100%

Myometrial histopathological study revealed leiomyoma in 59% cases, adenomyosis in 3%, nonspecific changes in 37%, chronic myometritis in 0.5% and endometrial adenocarcinomain in 0.5% cases [Table 9].

Table 9

Histopathological changes (Myometrium)

S.No.

Myometrial Changes

No. of Patients

Percentage (%)

1

Leiomyoma

118

59%

2

Adenomyosis

6

3%

3

Unremarkable/ Nonspecific

74

37%

4

Chronic Myometritis

1

0.5%

5

Endometroid adenocarcinoma

1

0.5%

Total

200

100%

Discussion

Hysterectomy is a quite common major operative procedure. In our study 48% patients who underwent elective hysterectomy were between age group of 41-50 years. Ajmera S K et al. have reported peak age group of hysterectomy was 40-49 years with 41.51% cases.2 Manik. S. Sirpurkar and Smita. S. Patne have reported 51.3% of hysterectomy patients were in the age group of 41-50 years in their study done on 230 hysterectomy cases at J.K. Hospital Bhopal.3 In the present study, the commonest indication was fibroid uterus i.e., 59% cases. Manik. S. Sirpukar et al. have reported that the commonest indication for hysterectomy was dysfunctional uterine bleeding (39.13%) followed by fibroid uterus (29.13%). 3 Bala R et al. have reported fibroid uterus in 40.7% hysterectomy patients in their study done at RIMS, Imphal on 1,285 cases of hysterectomy. 4

In the current study most common clinical presentation was heavy menstrual bleeding (52%). Sucheta K L et al. in their prospective study of 200 cases of hysterectomy in Bangalore, India have found abnormal menstrual flow in 62% of cases.5 Majority preferred abdominal route for hysterectomy (80%). Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was done in 55% cases and total abdominal hysterectomy alone in 25% cases. Vaginal hysterectomy was performed in 20% cases (15% for prolapsed uterus and 5% had no uterine descent). Rekha Rao et al. in their study on 150 hysterectomy patients observed that maximum no of hysterectomies were performed by abdominal route, total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral/ unilateral salpingoophorectomy in 36.6.3% cases followed by vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic floor repair in 29.3% cases and 6.6% cases underwent Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy. 6

In this study bilateral salpingoophorectomy was done in 55% cases while doing hysterectomy. Rajeshwari BV and Varsha Hishikar have reported both ovaries were removed only in 14.23 % cases in their retrospective study on 260 cases of hysterectomy operation. 7

In the present study intraoperative complication rate during hysterectomy was 6%. Shridevi AS et al. in their study over 300 cases of hysterectomies at Davanagere, Karnataka, India reported the rate of intraoperative complication was 8.8%. 8 In our study 3% cases of hysterectomy had excessive bleeding and were managed medically and perioperative blood transfusion was given. One patient (0.5%) had bladder injury and another one (0.5%) had ureteric injury which was repaired with the help of surgeon. According to Zaman S et al. most common complication of hysterectomy operation was secondary haemorrhage (1.12%) and Bladder injury was in 0.56% of cases.9 In our study 2 patients (1%) had burst abdomen and another 2 patients (1%) had urinary tract infection. 4% of cases of hysterectomies operation had wound gaping and secondary suturing was done. Sivapragasam V et al. have reported wound infection in 4.54% cases and wound gaping requiring secondary suturing in 2% cases.10 Endometrial histopathological study of uterine specimen revealed endometrial hyperplasia in 14% cases in our study which is comparable to study done by Ranabhat et al. who reported its incidence of 16%. 11 Histopathological examination study of cervix revealed 92% cases had chronic non specific cervicitis. According to Talukder S I et al. 87.8% cases had chronic non specific cervicites. 12 Leiomyoma was detected in 59% cases on histopathological study of myometrium, whereas Abdullah L S in his study reported leiomyoma as myometrial lesion in 30.3% cases.13

Conclusion

Hysterectomy is a common operation in gynaecological practice. The conditions that may lead to a hysterectomy causes discomfort rather than threaten life. Indication for hysterectomy should be thoroughly evaluated as it is having both intraoperative and postoperative complications like any other major surgery. At present many conservative methods are available to treat various benign gynecological conditions. So it is prudent to discuss with the patient regarding various options available before planning for major surgery. Vaginal route should be preferred as it is associated with faster return to normal activity, shorter hospital stays, reduced intraoperative blood loss and fewer wound infection.

Acknowledgement

We are very much thankful to all the doctors and staffs of the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, F.M Medical College & Hospital, Balasore, Odisha for their active involvement while conducting this study.

Sources of Funding

No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest.

References

1 

J M Wu M E Wechter E J Geller T V Nguyen A G Visco Hysterectomy rates in the United StatesObstet Gynecol2003110510915

2 

S K Ajmera L Mettler W Jonat Operative spectrum of hysterectomy in a German university hospitalJ Obstet Gynecol India20065615963

3 

MS Sirpurkar SS Patne A Retrospective Review of Hysterectomies at a Tertiary Care Centre in Central IndiaAsian J Biomed Pharm Sci20133214850

4 

R Bala KP Devi CM Singh C M Trend of hysterectomy. A retrospective analysis in RIMS, ImphalInt J Gynaecol Obstet India201329147

5 

K L Sucheta M Manangi K P Madhu B J Arun N Nagaraj Hysterectomy: clinical profile, indications and postoperative complicationsInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20165720939

6 

PM.Rekha Rao D Vijayalakshmi DS Reddy To study the Trends in Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Hospital Based on the Indications of HysterectomyIOSR J Dent Med Sci20191844953

7 

B V Rajeshwari V Hishikar Views and reviews of hysterectomy: a retrospective study of 260 cases over a period of 1 yearBombay Hospital J20085015961

8 

A S Shridevi R B Madhusoodana GL Gyatri Renuka An analysis of elective hysterectomies at a tertiary care center in KarnatakaInt J Clin Obstet Gynaecol201934687010.33545/gynae.2019.v3.i4b.291

9 

S Zaman A A Begum Hysterectomies at a rural medical college of Assam: A retrospective studyJ Obstet Gynaecol Barpeta201412859

10 

V Sivapragasam C K Rengaswamy A B Patil An audit of hysterectomies: indications, complications, clinico pathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens in a tertiary care centreInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol20187936899410.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183778

11 

S K Ranabhat R Shrestha M Tiwari D P Sinha L R Subedee A retrospective histopathological study of hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy specimensJCMC201011269

12 

S I Talukder M A Haque Alam Mo A Roushan Z Noor K Nahar Histopathological analysis of hysterectomy specimensMymensingh Med J2007161814

13 

L S Abdullah Hysterectomy:A Clinicopathologic CorrelationBahrain Med Bull200628216



jats-html.xsl

© 2021 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)