Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 226

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 367


Kumar Mohapatra, Nayak, Joyce, and Hoogar: A prospective study on Intussusception of bowel in adults: Unusual presentations, diagnosis and operative strategies


Introduction

Intussusception refers to a condition where one segment of the intestine becomes drawn in to the lumen of the distal segment of the bowel. Intussesception is a relatively common cause of intestinal obstruction in infancy but accounts to only 5% of obstruction in adult population. Median age of presentation of adults is 4th – 6th decade. Most of the adult cases have an inflammatory lesion or neoplasm as lead point and most of them are malignant.1, 2 There is no specific guidelines regarding the treatment of adult intussusception but mainly involves resection of involved bowel. Awareness of this rare entity is essential for the correct diagnosis and management.

Etiopathogenesis

The commonest type of intussusception in adults is ileocolic. 3 The pathology leading this may be Lipoma, Fibroma, Polyp, Meckel’s diverticulum, or Hemangioma. 4 Malignancy as a cause is usually seen in large bowel intussusceptions. Disorders in peristalsis lead to intussusceptions. Any focal lesion in the bowel will alter the normal peristalsis. This tends to push the proximal bowel into the lumen of distal bowel segment. The lesion acts as the lead point and is called as the apex of intussusceptions. The bowel become edematous and compromises the blood supply leading to obstruction. Left untreated it will eventually become gangrenous. 5

Results

Demographics

A total of 23 patients with diagnose of intussusceptions were included whose age is more than 18 years. Mean age of patients was 53.43 years with a range of 26 to 76 years. Out of 23 patients 16 (69.56%) were males and 7 (30.43%) were females. There were 12 cases of ileoileal intussusceptions, 8 cases of ileocaecal intussusceptions 2 cases of jejenojejenal intussusceptions and 1 case of colocolic intussusception.

Clinical manifestations

Abdominal pain was the most common presenting complaint. 18 patients had complaints of pain abdomen. Abdominal distension and features of bowel obstruction was shown by 13 patients. Nausea and vomiting was shown by 8 patients. Diarrhea, constipation, rectal bleeding were other symptoms. Mean duration of symptoms was 6.95 days.

Table 1

Symptoms and signs

n (%)

Pain abdomen

19 (82.6%)

Absolute constipation

14 (60.86%)

Abdominal distension

13 (56.52%)

Nausea

8 (34.78%)

Vomiting

6 (26.08%)

Diarrhea

3 (13.04%)

Rectal bleeding

2 (8.69%)

Preoperative diagnosis

All underwent preoperative digital abdominal X-ray as first investigation followed by ultrasound abdomen and pelvis. 15 cases presented to casualty showed multiple air fluid level suggestive of intestinal obstruction. Further all cases underwent ultra sound scan and then CT scan to confirm the diagnosis. Ultrasonographic findings include typical target sign and doughnut sign but this investigation is performer dependent and maybe missed at times. CT scan is thus the best modality for diagnosis of intussusceptions.

Figure 1
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/aab9909f-4192-4d41-90c9-7ab0301abf2fimage1.png

Location

Out of 23 cases of adult intussusceptions 12 were ileoileal, 5 cases were ileocaecal, 3 cases were Ileo ileocaecal 2 cases were jejenojejenal, and 1 was colocolic in location

Table 2

Location

Number of cases (%)

Ileo ileal

12 (52.17%)

Ileo caecal

5 (21.73%)

Ileo ileo caecal

3 (13.04%)

Jejeno jejenal

2 (8.69%)

Colo colic

1 (4.34%)

Treatment and post-operative management

All the 23 cases underwent elective operative management after thorough pre op investigations.(Table 3)

Table 3

No. of patients

Age

Sex

Location

Preoperative diagnosis

Procedure

1

68

F

Ileo ileocaecal

USG and CECT

Right hemicolectomy and ileostomy

2

32

M

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction

3

51

M

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and anastomosis

4

26

M

Jejenojejenal

USG and CECT

Reduction

5

38

M

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and anastomosis

6

40

F

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, segmental resection and anastomosis

7

53

M

Ileocaecal

USG and CECT

Reduction, segmental ileal re section and anastomosis

8

61

M

Ileocaecal

USG and CECT

Reduction, ileal resection and anastomosis

9

46

M

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction and polypectomy

10

52

M

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and anastomosis

11

64

F

Ileo ileocaecal

USG and CECT

Resection and anastomosis

12

66

M

Ileocaecal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and ileo transverse colon side to side anastomosis

13

42

M

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and anastomosis

14

76

M

Ileocaecal

USG and CECT

Right hemicolectomy and ileocolic side to side anastomosis

15

63

F

Ileocaecal

USG and CECT

Resection and end ileostomy

16

44

M

Ileo ileocaecal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and side to side ileo ascending colon anastomosis

17

56

F

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and anastomosis

18

60

M

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and anastomosis

19

37

M

Jejenojejenal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and anastomosis

20

44

F

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction

21

67

M

Colocolic

USG and CECT

Left hemicolectomy and end colostomy

22

73

M

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and end ileostomy

23

70

F

Ileoileal

USG and CECT

Reduction, resection and anastomosis

3 patients underwent simple reduction of intussusceptions. 12 patients underwent resection and anastomosis. 1 patient underwent reduction and polypectomy. 2 patients underwent right hemicolectomy. 1 patient underwent ileostomy. Another patient underwent left hemicolectomy and end colostomy. Resection and ileo transverse colon side to side anastomosis and ileo ascending colon side to side anastomosis were done for another 2 patients.(Table 4)

Table 4

Procedure performed

Number (%)

Resection and anastomosis

12 (52.17%)

Reduction and polypectomy

1 (4.34%)

Right hemicolectomy

2 (8.69%)

Ileostomy

1 (4.34%)

Left hemicolectomy and end colostomy

1 (4.34%)

Reduction of intussusceptions

3 (13.04%)

Ileo colon anastomosis

2 (8.69%)

Figure 2
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/aab9909f-4192-4d41-90c9-7ab0301abf2fimage2.png
Figure 3
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/aab9909f-4192-4d41-90c9-7ab0301abf2fimage3.png

Discussion

Adult intussusception is an uncommon clinical entity unlike in children. Sir Jonathan Hutchinson was the first to successfully operate on a child with intussusception in 1871. 6

Intussception in adults and children differs in various aspects and clinical presentation is also different. (Table 3Table 3 ) 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

Table 5

Difference between adult and childhood intussusceptions

Children

Adult

Percentage of intussusceptions

95%

5%

Aetiology

90% idiopathic

Rarely idiopathic

Classical triad of vomiting, rectal bleeding and abdominal pain

Usually present

Occurs in only 15%-20%

Treatment

Mainly non operative

Surgical resection is almost always required

In our study abdominal pain was the most common presentation (82.6%) followed by absolute constipation (60.84%) and abdominal distenstion (56.52%).

In adults the site of intussusception is 90% in small or large bowel and the remaining 10% involve the stomach or a surgically created stoma. 12 In our study all 23 cases were involving either small or large bowel.

The review article by Azar et al 7 shows a mean duration of symptoms between onset and presentation of 37.4 days. In our study the mean duration of presentation was 48.3 days. Elderly patients presented later than the younger patients.

The traditional treatment with barium enema has a good result in pediatric population but it cannot be done in adult population. 13

Several imaging techniques may help in preoperative diagnosis. Plain abdominal Xrays are typically the first diagnostic tool and shows signs of intestinal obstruction if any and can provide site of obstruction in many cases. 13, 14 Contrast studies will help to identify the exact location and in many cases the cause of obstruction also. The classical features of intussusceptions in ultrasonography are “Target and Doughnut sign” on transverse view and “Pseudokidney sign” in longitudinal view. The disadvantage of ultrasound is masking by gas filled loops of bowel and its operator dependency. In our study we did preoperative ultrasonography and confirmed the diagnosis by Contrast enhanced CT scan of abdomen.

There is almost always an underlying pathology in adult intussusceptions and careful assessment after reduction is required however in our study young adults with no underlying lead point were treated with simple reduction only. If the blood supply is doubtful then resection and anastomosis of entire lesion is mainstay of treatment. If lesion involves colon then no attempt should be made to reduce the intussusceptions. 13, 14 Reduction can be attempted if the small bowel is involved and there is no suspicion of malignancy. A wide resection and anastomosis is the safest procedure considering high chances of malignancy. All cases in our study with involvement of colon underwent resection without reduction.

Begos et al 15 suggest resection without attempting reduction when the bowel is inflames ischemic, or friable and in obvious colo colic intussusceptions. However Azar et al7 suggested that surgical resection without reduction is the preferred treatment in adults. In our study small intestinal intussusceptions without any signs of malignancy were reduced and resection and anastomosis was done only after examining the bowel post reduction but the large bowel intussusceptions underwent resection without reduction.

Conclusion

Adult intussusceptions are rare and often difficult to diagnose pre operatively due to non-specific symptoms. A high index of suspicion is required when patients with suspected features of intussusceptions are presented. Abdominal CT scans have a good role in pre-operative diagnosis. Most of the adult intussusceptions have a lead point. Treatment usually is resection of involved bowel since there is a very high chance of malignant lesions as lead point in large bowel intussusceptions. Overall a careful evaluation is required in managing the adult intussusceptions.

Sources of Funding

No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest.

References

1 

D G Begos A Sandor I M Modlin The diagnosis and management of adult intussusceptionAm J Surg19971732889410.1016/S0002-9610(96)00419-9

2 

D Weilbaecher J A Bolin D Hearn W Ogden Intussusception in adults. Review of 160 casesAm J Surg19711215531510.1016/0002-9610(71)90133-4

3 

N Erkan M Haciyani M Yildrim H Sayhan E Vardar A F Polat Intussusception in adults: an unusual and challenging condition for surgeonsInt J Colorectal Dis20052054526

4 

K Vagholkar R Chavan A Mahadik I Maurya Lipoma of the Small Intestine: A Cause for Intussusception in AdultsCase Rep Surg201510.1155/2015/856030

5 

L T Wang C C Wu J C Yu C W Hsiao C C Hsu S W Jao Clinical entity and treatment strategies for adult intussusception : 20 years' experienceDis Colon Rectum2007501119419

6 

Hutchinson JA successful case of abdominal section for intussusceptionProc R Med Chir Soc187371958

7 

T Azar D L Berger Adult intussusceptionAnn Surg19972262134810.1097/00000658-199708000-00003

8 

D M Nagomey M G Sarr D C Mcllrath Surgical management of intussusception in the adultAnn Surg19811932230610.1097/00000658-198102000-00019

9 

F P Agha Intussusception in adultsAm J Roentgenol198614635273110.2214/ajr.146.3.527

10 

C A Adebamowo E E Akang H U Pindiga Changing cinicopothological profile of intussusception in Nigeria-a 20-year reviewHepatogastroenterology2000473243740

11 

H A Reijnen H) Joosten De Boer H H Diagnosis and treatment of adult intussusceptionAm J Surg1989158125810.1016/0002-9610(89)90309-7

12 

W T Stubenord B Thorblamarson Intussusception in adultsAnn Surg197017223061010.1097/00000658-197008000-00019

13 

L K Eisen J D Cunningham A H Aufses Intussusception in adults: institutional reviewJ Am Coll Surg19991884390510.1016/s1072-7515(98)00331-7

14 

P Cerro L Magrini P Porcari O De Angelis Sonographic T diagnosis of intussusceptions in adultsAbdom Imaging200025145710.1007/s002619910008

15 

L M Hurwitz S L Gertler Colonoscopic diagnosis of ileocolic intussusceptionGastrointest Endosc1986323217810.1016/s0016-5107(86)71810-5



jats-html.xsl

© 2021 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)