Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 221

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 456


Solanki, Manyal, Dubey, Patel, Sharma, and Verma: Adiponectin: A novel prognostic marker for rheumatoid arthritis: A case control study in a tertiary care hospital in central India


Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by symmetrical synovitis, progressive damage to the articular cartilage and the subchondral bone. 1

RA is chronic inflammatory disease characterised by raised level of inflammatory markers such as CRP, ESR and many other. Recognition of RA as early as possible is important, because a significant proportion of the patients develop irreversible joint damage shortly after disease onset.2 In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), early diagnosis and early therapeutic intervention can improve clinical outcomes and reduce the occurrence of joint damage and major irreversible long-term disabilities. 3 Finding serum biomarkers that can be used to identify patients at high risk of structural disease progression early in the disease is important because joint lesions occur mainly during this period and which may be reduced by early intervention.

Levels of inflammatory biomarkers {i.e. C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)} and presence of autoantibodies {i.e. rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies} are associated with subsequent RA structural severity. 4 However, the predictive value of these markers for early radiographic disease progression remains weak, especially in early disease. WAT is also considered a highly active endocrine organ that produces a number of biologically active molecules, called adipokines 5 that are involved in various important physiological processes. Adipokines are adipose tissue-specific soluble proteins, also produced by synovium and cartilage, as well as mononuclear blood cells, measurable in biologic fluids. 6 Adipokines, including resistin, leptin, and adiponectin. Inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1b, and interferon-g (IFN-g), can regulate the expression and the secretion of adiponectin.7 RA is characterised by chronic inflammation associated with increased production of inflammatory factors, as well as disturbances of the endocrine system. In RA there is also synovial hyperplasia and progressive joint destruction. 8, 9

Adiponectin stimulates the production of IL-8 and prostaglandin E2 by rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts & attenuates the inflammatory response mediated by tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), inhibits macrophage phagocytic activity and TNF-α production and also inhibits myelomonocytic cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis.6 Adiponectin is able to induce the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMPs-1) in the fibroblast like synoviocytes (FLSs) leading to joint inflammation and destruction. 10 The important role of adipokines in inflammation provides novel links between adipose tissues and inflammatory disorders including RA, thus attracting the interest of both basic researchers and clinical physicians. 9, 10

Materials and Methods

A case control study was carried out in MGMMC & MYH, Indore with 50 newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients and 50 apparently healthy controls between the age group of 20 to 70yrs. Cases are further divided into subgroups on the basis of DAS 28 Score, group B1- remission, group B-2 included mild cases of rheumatoid arthritis, group B-3 of moderate & group B-4 of severe cases of rheumatoid arthritis.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Past history of other autoimmune disease.

  2. Spondyloarthropathy

  3. Diabetes mellitus

  4. Oncological disease

  5. Chronic kidney disease

  6. Chronic liver disease

  7. Pregnancy

  8. Alcoholism

  9. Smoking

After overnight fasting of 8-10 hours, 5 ml of venous blood sample was drawn by venepuncture from a peripheral vein under all aseptic precautions in a disposable syringe. The blood was collected in clot activator tube & EDTA tube. Clot activator tube was allowed to stand for 30 minutes at room temperature for the retraction of clot. Then it was centrifuged at 3000 r.p.m. for 10 minutes to separate the serum. Care was taken to avoid haemolysis of the sample. Routine haematological (ESR) (from EDTA tube) and biochemical tests (lipid profile, uric acid & CRP) (from serum) were performed on the fresh samples on the same day. Then remaining serum sample was stored at -20°C for further analysis. Sample were only exposed to a single freeze/thaw cycle to minimise the risk of contamination of the samples. The stored serum samples were analysed for Adiponectin.

All the data was analysed by using SPSS version 20. Results on continuous measurements were presented as Mean ± SD. P value < 0.05(95% confidence interval) was considered significant and p value < 0.001 considered as highly significant. Unpaired student t test was applied to find the significance of study parameters on continuous scale between two ANOVA and POST HOC TUKEY tests were applied for comparisons within multiple groups (control with mild cases, control with moderate/severe cases and between mild and severe cases).

Table 1

Distribution of patients according to sex in both the groups

Sex

Control Group

Rheumatoid Arthritis Group

No.

%

No.

%

Female

40

80.0

43

86.0

Male

10

20.0

7

14.0

Total

50

100.0

50

100.0

Table 2

Distribution of patients according to DAS-28 grading in Rheumatoid Arthritis group

Control Group

Rheumatoid Arthritis Group

No.

%

No.

%

Remission    (<2.6)

0

0.0

2

4.0

Low disease activity (>2.6-<3.2)

0

0.0

2

4.0

Moderate disease activity(>3.2-<5.1)

0

0.0

30

60.0

High disease activity   (>5.1)

0

0.0

16

32.0

Total

0

0.0

50

100.0

Table 3

Comparison of various biochemical parameters between the two groups

Parameter

Control group (Mean±SD)

Rheumatoid Arthritis Group (Mean±SD)

‘t’ value

P value

Cholesterol

167.02 ± 25.87

169.14 ± 32.93

-0.358, df=98

0.721, NS

HDL

50.15 ± 6.95

47.35 ± 9.49

1.682, df=98

0.096, NS

LDL

93.13 ± 27.38

90.52 ± 28.67

0.466, df=98

0.643, NS

Triglycerides

121.28 ± 21.96

156.32 ± 63.58

-3.683, df=98

0.000*

VLDL

24.26 ± 4.39

31.26 ± 12.72

-3.683, df=98

0.000*

Uric acid

3.98 ± 1.39

4.04 ± 1.57

-0.206, df=98

0.838, NS

Table 4

Comparison of hematologial parameters between the two groups

Parameter

Control group (Mean±SD)

Rheumatoid Arthritis Group (Mean±SD)

‘t’ value

P value

ESR

15.70 ± 5.40

21.26 ± 8.88

-3.784, df=98

0.000*

CRP

11.09 ± 7.95

21.56 ± 25.46

-2.776, df=98

0.007*

Table 5

Comparison of mean adiponectin level between the two groups

Parameter

Control group (Mean±SD)

Rheumatoid Arthritis Group (Mean±SD)

‘t’ value

P value

Adiponectin Level (µg/ml)

17.08 ± 8.69

30.13 ± 13.04

-5.892, df=98

0.000*

Table 6

Comparison of mean adiponectin level in the rheumatoid arthritis group in relation to DAS-28 grading

DAS-28 Grading

No.

Mean ± SD

F value

P value

Remission

2

35.2 ± 14.4

5.75

0.002*

Low disease activity

2

13.51 ± 1.20

Moderate disease activity

30

26.25 ± 11.44

High disease activity

16

38.86 ± 11.72

Total

50

The above table shows the distribution of patients according to sex in both the groups. In the control group, there were 40 females (80.0%) and 10 males (20.0%). In the rheumatoid arthritis group, there were 43 female (86.0%) and 7 males (14.0%). In both the groups, there was a female preponderance.Table 1

The above table shows the distribution of patients according to DAS-28 grading in both the groups. In the rheumatoid arthritis group, there were 2 patients (4.0%) had remission, 2 patients (4.0%) had low disease activity, 30 patients (60.0%) had moderate disease activity and 16 patients (32.0%) had high disease activity. In majority of the patients in the rheumatoid arthritis group were having moderate to high disease activity.Table 2

One-way ANOVA test applied. P value =0.002, Significant. The above table shows the comparison of mean adiponectin level in the rheumatoid arthritis group in relation to DAS-28 grading. The mean adiponectin level in the remission subgroup was 35.2 ± 14.4 µg/ml, in the low disease activity subgroup was 13.51 ± 1.20 µg/ml, in the moderate disease activity subgroup was 26.25 ± 11.44 µg/ml and in the high disease activity subgroup was 38.86 ± 11.72 µg/ml. The mean adiponectin level was highest in the high disease activity subgroup and lowest in the low disease activity subgroup.

The comparison of mean adiponectin level between the DAS-28 grades was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05), showing that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean adiponectin level between the DAS-28 grades.

Discussion

Adiponectin seems to be the most interesting and promising biologically active molecule released from fat cells. In this study majority of the patients were in the age group 31-40 years with female preponderance i.e. 43:7 (F:M) which is in concordance with study by Kang, Lee, Kim et al (2014) in which female to male ratio was32:8.11

The main finding of our study is increase in plasma adiponectin levels in all patients with RA compared with the control group (P=0.000). This result is in concordance with the results of Ozygen et al.12 They found that serum adiponectin levels were significantly higher in RA group than control group (P<0.05). We found that serum adiponectin level was increased with increase in the severity of the disease. In mild disease activity subgroup adiponectin concentration was low as compared to high disease activity subgroup. As adiponectin may be an important modulator of inflammatory response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, it can be postulated that it may have a role in modulating the inflammatory response by inhibiting the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, suppressing macrophage function and inhibiting NFkB signalling, as reviewed by Fantuzzi et al.13 Adiponectin has anti-inflammatory properties and can counteract the pro-inflammatory effects of TNF-α, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, which may influence the production of IL-6 and CRP in rheumatoid arthritis.14 Thus, the putative anti-inflammatory role of adiponectin in this scenario is worthy of further evaluation.

Conclusion

Significant changes in the level of inflammatory markers such as adiponectin, CRP, ESR in RA patients confirms role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of RA. This might be helpful to futher assessment of risk. Furher studies are also required for a general assumption on the aspect conducted to assess the effect of adiponectin on disease activity in Rheumatoid arthritis and its association with CRP.Also higher levels of adiponectin were observed in patients with severe disease. Therefore, adiponectin might be used for screening which will help in predicting disease progression.

Source of Funding

None.

Interest of Conflicts

None.

References

1 

H S El-Gabalawy P Duray R Goldbach-Mansky Evaluating patients with arthritis of recent onset: Studies in pathogenesis and prognosisJAMA200022841823687310.1001/jama.284.18.2368

2 

L R Lard H Visser I Speyer I E Horst-Bruinsma A H Zwinderman F C Breedveld Early versus delayed treatment in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of two cohorts who received different treatment strategiesAm J Med200111164465110.1016/s0002-9343(01)00872-5

3 

E Lindqvist K Eberhardt K Bendtzen D Heinegard T Saxne Prognostic laboratory markers of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritisAnn Rheum Dis200564219620110.1136/ard.2003.019992

4 

O Vittecoq S Pouplin K Krzanowska F Jouen-Beades J F Menard A Gayet Rheumatoid factor is the strongest predictor of radiological progression of rheumatoid arthritis in a three-year prospective study in community-recruited patientsRheumatology20034289394610.1093/rheumatology/keg257

5 

K Forslind M Ahlmen K Eberhardt I Hafstrom B Svensson Group BS: Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP)Ann Rheum Dis20046391090510.1136/ard.2003.014233

6 

É Toussirot G Streit D Wendling The contribution of adipose tissue and adipokines to inflammation in joint diseasesCurr Med Chemistry200714101095100

7 

D Mafra F Guebre-Egziabher D Fouque Body mass index, muscle and fat in chronic kidney disease: questions about survivalNephrol Dial Transplant20082382461610.1093/ndt/gfn053

8 

K Almehed H Forsblad D’elia M Bokarewa H Carlsten Role of resistin as a marker of inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis Res Ther2008101R1510.1186/ar2366

9 

H Ilg A R Moschen Adipocytokines: mediators linking adipose tissue, inflammation and immunityNat Rev Immunol20066107728310.1038/nri1937

10 

A Koerner J Kratzsch W Kiess Adipocytokines: leptin--the classical, resistin--the controversial, adiponectin--the promising, and more to comeBest Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab20051945254610.1016/j.beem.2005.07.008

11 

E H Kang Y J Lee T K Kim C B Chang J H Chung K Shin Adiponectin is a potential catabolic mediator in osteoarthritis cartilageArthritis Res Ther2010126R23110.1186/ar3218

12 

M Ozygen S Koca N Dagli Serum Adiponectin and Vaspin Levels in Rheumatoid ArthritisArch Med Res2005115419119

13 

G Fantuzzi Adipose tissue, adipokines, and inflammationJ Allergy Clin Immunol20051155911910.1016/j.jaci.2005.02.023

14 

M Otero Lago F Gomez C Lago J Dieguez O Go´mez-Reino Changes in plasma levels of fat-derived hormones adiponectin, leptin, resistin and visfatin in patients with rheumatoid arthritisAnn Rheum Dis2006659119820110.1136/ard.2005.046540



jats-html.xsl

© 2022 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)