Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 239

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 292


Radhakrishnan KR, Sivasubramanian T, Pandian DR, Ranjani R, and Balasubramanian C: A comparative study between CO2 laser tonsillectomy and conventional tonsillectomy


Introduction

Tonsils are lymphoid tissue aggregates at the entrance to the digestive and respiratory tracts that play an important role in our immune system. They function as the first line of defence, initiating an immune response to pathogens inhaled or ingested. The Waldeyer ring is made up of palatine tonsils (faucial tonsils), adenoids (nasopharyngeal tonsils), lingual tonsils, and tubal tonsils circumferential ring of tonsils located in the oropharynx. When specialists talk about tonsils, they usually mean the palatine tonsils, located at the back of the throat between the two palatine arches (pillars). Tonsils, like other lymphoid tissues, play a role in the body's immune response and defence against diseases and foreign pathogens. The tonsils have a unique immunological function.1

Tonsillotomy is attributed to less post-operative pain and bleeding and a quicker recovery time and higher patient satisfaction.2, 3 These facts explain why, in recent decades, the number of studies looking into the possible value of tonsillotomy in children with obstructive symptoms has increased.

Tonsillotomy has been performed using several surgical techniques, including carbon dioxide laser (CO2 laser), radiofrequency, microdebrider, diode laser, coblation, scissors, bipolar coagulation scissors, and argon plasma coagulation, though tonsillar surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by ENT surgeons. The technique of CO2 laser tonsillotomy for the treatment of tonsillar hyperplasia has been the subject of numerous studies. 4, 5

We compare both the CO2 laser and the traditional technique in a single patient in this study to eliminate individual variables and make each patient their own control.

Aim

To study the outcome of surgical procedures between CO2 laser tonsillectomy and conventional tonsillectomy.

Materials and Methods

This prospective comparative study of CO2 LASER versus conventional tonsillectomy was done in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Thanjavur Medical College Hospital, from October 2017 to September 2018. Fifty patients with chronic tonsillitis, tonsilloliths, cysts, or neoplasms who were candidates for tonsillectomy were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to have one tonsil removed by CO2 laser and the other by conventional dissection. To rule outpatients with associated adenoid hypertrophy and secretory otitis media, as well as other systemic and associated diseases, a preoperative examination using X-ray nasopharynx, diagnostic nasal endoscopy, impedance audiogram, and CECT neck is performed.

Inclusion criteria

All patients with a diagnosis of chronic tonsillitis of different types, patients of tonsillar enlargement including cyst, neoplasm, lith, patients in the age group above 11 years

Exclusion criteria

Patients with systemic diseases, coagulation disorders, age of the patients below 11 years, patients with acute exacerbation of the disease.

All of the patients in the study were given a thorough history and evaluation of their ears, nose, and throat.

Clinical examination, pure tone audiometry (in select cases for exclusion criteria), impedance audiometry (in select cases for exclusion criteria), X-Ray skull soft tissue lateral view (in select cases for exclusion criteria), diagnostic nasal endoscopy (in select cases for exclusion criteria), and routine blood investigation were all performed on all patients included in the study.

Patients were evaluated before the surgery to undergo general anaesthesia. Following a thorough examination, patients were randomly assigned to have one tonsil removed with a CO2 laser and the other with a conventional dissection procedure. Half of the patients in this study had their right tonsil removed with a CO2 laser and their left tonsil removed by dissection. The left tonsil was removed with a CO2 laser, and the right tonsil was removed by dissection in the other half of the patients. On the first, second, and seventh post-operative days, all patients were evaluated to evaluate post-operative morbidity and efficacy of both conventional and CO2 laser methods.

Results

In this study, 50 patients equal in both gender were included, most of the patients were found in the age group of 16 to 25 years. The duration of surgery in the CO2 laser method was 11.8±3.65 minutes and the conventional method was 16.4±4.66 minutes. (P <0.0001)

The intraoperative blood loss in the CO2 laser method was 18.74±6.86ml and conventional method, it was 44.02±9.38ml. (P<0.0001)

The first-day post-operative pain score was 3.92±0.92 in the CO2 laser method and 7.42±1.18 in conventional method patient. (P<0.0001) The second-day post-operative pain score was 3.64±0.8 in the CO2 laser method and 6.2±0.96 in conventional method patient. (P<0.0001) The seventh-day post-operative pain score was 2.97±0.99 in the CO2 laser method and 3.82±0.7 in conventional method patient. (P<0.0001)

The amount of slough covered in the tonsillar fossa was used to estimate post-operative tonsillar fossa healing. The first-day post-operative tonsillar fossa healing was 80.3±7.02 in the CO2 laser method and 39.8±7.88 in the conventional method patient. (P<0.0001) The second-day post-operative tonsillar fossa healing was 73.6±20.7 in the CO2 laser method and 47.2±5.16 in the conventional method patient. (P<0.0001) The seventh-day post-operative tonsillar fossa healing was 48.47±7.52 in the CO2 laser method and 18.69±8.72 in the conventional method patient. (P<0.0001)

In the first, second, and seventh post-operative days, the percentage of slough formation in the tonsillar fossa was 80 percent, 74 percent, and 45 percent in the CO2 laser method, respectively, while in the conventional method was 40 percent, 47 percent, and 17 percent.

There was no primary or secondary hemorrhage in our study. These results were analyzed and compared using chi-square testing, and it was found to be statistically significant.

Figure 1

Distribution of duration of surgery in minutes

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/3c240760-9aba-4664-8a79-04aac2099fffimage1.png
Figure 2

Distribution of blood loss in ml

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/3c240760-9aba-4664-8a79-04aac2099fffimage2.png
Figure 3

Distribution of Post-operative pain score

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/3c240760-9aba-4664-8a79-04aac2099fffimage3.png
Figure 4

Distribution of tonsillar fossa healing in percentage

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/3c240760-9aba-4664-8a79-04aac2099fffimage4.png

Discussion

Tonsillectomy is a very common surgery performed by an ENT surgeon around the world. Most ENT surgeons still favour the dissection and snare method among the various tonsillectomy techniques available.

In our sample, the average surgery time for the conventional method was 16.4 minutes (ranging from 11 to 25 minutes), while the average surgery time for the CO2 Laser method was 11.8 minutes (ranging from 7 to 18 minutes). In their studies, Wan Ishalh et al. identified the time of surgery and found that the CO2 Laser method took less time than the conventional method. 6

Similar studies were identified by Mohammadi et al., who discovered that CO2 Laser has a shorter duration than the conventional process. The CO2 laser method takes less time in our sample, with a p-value of >0.05, which is statistically insignificant. 7

The average intraoperative blood loss in the conventional method was 43.44ml, ranging from 15 to 60ml, while the CO2 Laser method was 18.74ml, ranging from 10 to 50ml, with a statistically significant p-value of 0.001. Conventional tonsillectomy, according to G.Mohammadi et al., is associated with more severe blood loss (5ml vs 15ml), which is statistically significant. 7

Compared to the traditional approach, Hossain AT et al. found that CO2 laser caused less post-operative pain. 8 Similar study by Obasikene G et al. who discovered that CO2 laser causes more post-operative pain. The pain was significantly less in the CO2 laser system on the 1st, 2nd, and 7th POD pain, with p-values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.002, respectively. 9

The presence of slough in the tonsillar fossa on the 1st, 2nd, and 7th post-operative days delayed tonsillar fossa healing using the CO2 Laser approach in our study. Early slough formation and delayed healing are caused by the CO2 laser. Both have a similar impact on slough formation, according to G. Mohammadi et al. 7

In a conventional method, Alharbi FA et al. identified two patients who had a reactionary haemorrhage. 10 There was no reactionary or secondary haemorrhage in any of the patients in our sample.

Conclusion

CO2 laser tonsillectomy is a relatively simple procedure to provide near-bloodless field and minimize damage to surrounding tissue. The operational time required for the completion of CO2 laser tonsillectomy would be less than the conventional techniques. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower on the CO2 laser technique than on the dissection side. Most notably, post-operative pain levels on the CO2 laser side were significantly lower on the first, second and seventh post-operative days. It allows patients to regain their daily routines early on.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

Sour c e of Funding

None.

References

1 

K G Masters D Zezoff Anatomy, Head and Neck, Tonsils. [Updated 2020 Aug 22]. In: StatPearls [Internet]2020Stat Pearls Publishinghttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539792/

2 

JP Windfuhr K Savva JD Dahm JA Werner Tonsillotomy: facts and fictionEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol201527249496910.1007/s00405-014-3010-x

3 

JP Windfuhr JA Werner Tonsillotomy: it's time to clarify the factsEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol20132701229859610.1007/s00405-013-2577-y

4 

R Verma RR Verma RR Verma Tonsillectomy-Comparative Study of Various Techniques and Changing TrendIndian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg20176945495810.1007/s12070-017-1190-6

5 

RF Wetmore Surgical management of the tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy patientWorld J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg2017331768210.1016/j.wjorl.2017.01.001

6 

L W Ishlah A M Fahmi N Srinovianti Laser versus dissection technique of tonsillectomyMed J Malaysia20056017680

7 

G Mohammadi YJ Moghaddam R Radfar CO2 laser tonsillectomy: A comparison with conventional techniqueRawal Med J20073221879

8 

A T Hossain Mah Bhuyan S Afroza S Kabir AZ Huq CO2 laser tonsillectomy: A comparison with conventional techniqueBangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol201015169

9 

G Obasikene R Ramalingam A S Vadivu KK Ramalingam Newer Methods of Tonsillectomy as Compared to Conventional Dissection MethodJ Pain Relief201331126Newer Methods of Tonsillectomy as Compared to Conventional Dissection Method

10 

FA Alharbi MR Ahmed Post-operative Pain After Tonsillectomy; Comparison Between CO2 Laser Versus Conventional Dissection TonsillectomyJ Surg201532-12730



jats-html.xsl

© 2022 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)