Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 209

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 250


Satpathy, Mohanty, Routray, Dash, and Parhi: The prevalence of NAFLD in CAD and it’s correlation with their severity


Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) cause a third of world mortality, of which the most common cause is ischemic heart disease (IHD), causing approximately 7 million deaths per year.1 A surge of established determinants of CVD such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), dyslipidemia, and obesity is seen recently. 2

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined by triglyceride deposition in the liver exceeding 5% of the total Hepatic weight in the absence of a history of heavy alcohol intake and other causes of hepatic pathology. 3 NAFLD is associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. 4 NAFLD is a complex pathology, causing structural and functional modification of the liver, increasing morbidity and mortality from progression to end stage, liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. 5 Studies have shown that NAFLD has extra hepatic influence, also encompassing cardiovascular system (CVS) consequences.6 Surprisingly maximum mortality among NAFLD patients is cardiovascular, mostly ischemic heart disease.7 Evidences indicate that NAFLD causes endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and subclinical atherosclerosis of carotid artery. 8 The probability of NAFLD as a marker and cause of atherosclerosis has been lately evaluated. 9 Some studies however, reported that NAFLD may not be a causative agent of increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. 10   

The Gensini score is used to assess the severity of the Coronary Artery Disease (CAD).11 It considers the morphology, anatomy, location and the number of obstructions and the existence of the collaterals.

Material and Methods

The present study was designed and conducted to determine the prevalence of NAFLD in patients with CAD. This prospective study was carried out from Jan 2020 to Dec 2020 at a tertiary care center in the Department of Cardiology, SCB Medical College and Hospital. All patients with diagnosis of CAD admitted to the department of Cardiology, SCB Medical College during the period January 2020 to December 2020 who had undergone coronary angiogram were included in the study.

Inclusion criteria

Patients who underwent coronary artery angiography in our Department of Cardiology SCB MCH, CUTTACK for acute coronary syndrome or chest pain with or without any degree of stenosis in the coronary arteries or their branches in coronary angiography were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with age of less than 18 years, history of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), history of alcohol consumption, any hepatic disorder, cor pulmonale, chronic renal disease, cancer, acute or chronic infections, positive serology for hepatitis B, C, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or syphilis were excluded from the study

Coronary angiography was performed using the various diagnostic catheters, by the femoral or radial artery approach in the SIEMENS Artis Zee image intensifier machine. At least 3 orthogonal projections in all the patients were used to evaluate the severity of coronary atherosclerotic lesions. The Gensini score was used to assess the severity of CAD.

The Gensini score was derived for each segment by multiplying the multiplication coefficient allotted based on the importance of the myocardial area supplied by that segment: (the proximal segment of the right coronary artery, 1; the mid segment of the right coronary artery, 1; the distal segment of the right coronary artery, 1; and the posterior descending artery, 1;the proximal segment of the circumflex artery, 2.5; the distal segment of the circumflex artery, 1; the obtuse marginal branch, 1; the posterolateral branch, 0.5;the left main coronary artery, 5; the proximal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery, 2.5; the mid segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery, 1.5; the distal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery, 1; the first diagonal branch, 1; the second diagonal branch, 0.5;) by the severity score, assigned to each range of coronary stenosis according to the degree of narrowing of the lumen (narrowing up to 25%, 26-50%, 51-75%,76-90%, 91-99%,and complete occlusion were given Gensini scores of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32, respectively). The scores for each segment were summed and total Gensini scores were derived for each patient.

Diagnosis of NAFLD was made according to the ultrasound findings. All ultrasound examinations were performed after 12 hours of fasting by one radiologist using the device GELIGIQ F8; Samsung HS 70 A. Echogenicity of liver was compared to the echogenicity of the left kidney and using the following grading system: grade 0, no fatty liver; grade 1, mild disease; grade 2, moderate disease; and grade 3, severe disease. The method described by Saverymuttu et al was used to assess hepatic steatosis. 12 The method works based on the abnormally intense, high level echoes from the hepatic parenchyma, liver-kidney difference in echo amplitude and echo penetration into the deep portion of the liver and clarity of vascular pattern of the liver. 13

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight in kilograms and divided by height in meter square. Obesity was defined as having a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. 14 Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg as per 2019 American College of Cardiology hypertension guidelines, or requirement for antihypertensive medication. 15 Diabetes mellitus was defined according to ADA guidelines. 16

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done with IBM SPSS, 24.0 software. Continuous variables are expressed as Means ± SD and Median. Categorical variables are expressed as absolute numbers and percentages. Comparisons of continuous variables were performed using the unpaired Kruskal Wallis for analyses containing more than two groups and Mann Whittney test was carried out for patients having two groups. Categorical variables in the form of NAFLD staging and Gensini category based on severity score i.e., <20 vs ≥20 was analysed with the Chi-square test. Spearman rho correlation analysis was used for analysis of Correlation of Gensini with continuous variables. Significant level was set at <0.05.

Ethics

All the research participant of the study population had signed on informed consent permission from institute ethic committee was also taken

Results

Of the 124 participants, 112 (90.3%) patients had ST Elevated Myocardial infarction, 6 (4.8%) patients had Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and 6 (4.8%) patients had chronic stable angina.

Gender distribution of the study showed 104 (83.9%) men and 20 (16.1%) women. A total of 36 (29.03%) patients were hypertensive, 60 (48.38%) patients were diabetic, 30 (24.19%) patients were hyperlipidemic, and 88 (71%) patients were having fatty liver on ultrasonography.

Table 1

Mean and median value of the base line characters of the study group.

Variable

Mean ± S.D.

Median

Age (years)

54.6±10.34

57

Hb (gm %)

10.76±1.33

10.6

Gensini Score

34.47±27.68

32

TLC

9024.19±2227.08

8450

FBS (mg/dL)

138.81±67.01

114

PPBS (mg/dL)

186.66±78.45

153

Urea (mg/dL)

26±7.79

24

Creatinine (mg/dL)

1.17±1.28

1

EF (%)

47.98±11.06

50.5

Cholesterol (mg/dL)

182.53±50.73

171.5

TG (mg/dL)

151.76±74.67

135

LDL (mg/dL)

110.1±43.61

104

HDL (mg/dL)

43.23±8.94

42

VLDL (mg/dL)

28.42±11.67

28

BMI (kg/m2)

23.22±1.89

23.4

Table 1 shows Mean and Median value of the base line characters of the study group shows a mean and median age of 54.6±10.34 years and 57 years. The mean and median Gensini was 34.47±27.68 and 32. Mean and median values for PPBS were 186.66±78.45 and 153 respectively. level of Triglyceride with a mean of151.76±74.67 and median of 135 and cholesterol with a mean of 182.53±50.73 and median 171.5 and LDL with a mean of 110.1±43.61 and median of 104. Mean and Median value of Ejection fraction were 47.98±11.06 and 50.5 respectively.

Table 2

Sex distribution

Sex

Frequency

Percent

Female

20

16.1

Male

104

83.9

Total

124

100.0

Table 2 shows a predominant male population of patients constituting 83.9% (n=104) of population was found in the study.

Table 3

NAFLD distribution

NAFLD grade

Frequency

Percent

absent

36

29.0

present

88

71.0

Total

124

100.0

NAFLD grade

Frequency

Percent

0

36

29.0

1

24

19.4

2

64

51.6

Total

124

100.0

Table 3 shows 71% of patients had NAFLD. The highest proportion formed by the NAFLD group 2 i.e., 51.6% (n=64) followed by NAFLD 1 constituting 19.4 %. (n=24). None of the patient in our study group had stage 3 NAFLD.

Table 4

Frequency distribution of patients with severe and non-severe gensini category

Gensini category

Frequency

Percent

<20 (Lower)

42

33.9

≥20 (Higher)

82

66.1

Total

124

100.0

Table 4 shows Patients having aGensisi score of more than equal to 20 i.e., higher Gensini category constituted 66.1% of the total study population (n=82).

Table 5

Spearman’s Rho correlation analysis of mean Gensini with different continuous variables

Variable

Spearman’s Rho

p

Gensini Score 34.47±27.68

Hb(gm%) 10.76±1.33

-0.24

0.06

TLC9024.19±2227.08

-0.16

0.2

FBS(mg/dL)138.81±67.01

-0.1

0.4

PPBS(mg/dL)186.66±78.45

-0.14

0.27

Urea(mg/dL) 26±7.79

-0.11

0.39

Creatinine(mg/dL1.17±1.28

-0.25

0.04

EF(%)47.98±11.06

0.02

0.8

Cholesterol(mg/dL) 182.53±50.73

0.12

0.3

TG(mg/dL) 151.76±74.67

-0.03

0.8

LDL(mg/dL) 0110.1±43.61

0.06

0.6

HDL(mg/dL) 43.23±8.94

0.05

0.7

VLDL(mg/dL) 28.42±11.67

0.009

0.9

BMI (kg/m2) 23.22±1.89

0.09

0.48

Table 5 shows Spearman’s Rho analysis of meanGensini with different continuous variables (Hb, TLC, FBS, PPBS, Urea, Creatine, EF, Cholesterol, TG, LDL, HDL, VLDL, BMI) showed that only creatinine is associated significantly with Gensini score (p = 0.04), negatively (Spearman’s Rho = -0.25).

Table 6

Chi square test of Gensini less than 20 and more than equal to 20 with NAFLD Grade 0,1 and 2

Cross Tabulation

Gensini Category

<20 (Lower)

≥20 (Higher)

Chi Square

p

NAFLD

0

24(57.1%)

12(14.6%)

15.26

<0.001

1

-

24(29.3%)

2

18(42.9%)

46(56.1%)

Table 6 shows Chi square test of higher and lower Gensini categories with NAFLD Grade 0,1 and 2 showed a significant association of NAFLD stages and Gensini severity category with chi square value of 15.26 which is significant with a p value of <0.001.

Table 7

Kruskal Wallis test of median value of Gensini showing a significant difference between the three groups formed by the NAFLD 0, 1 and 2

Gensini Score Mean ± SD

Median

IQR

Mean Rank

Kruskal-Wallis H

p

NAFLD Score 0

19.72±23.18

10.75

2.25-40

21.03

10.05

0.007

NAFLD Score 1

44±12.38

43.5

32.25-55.25

41.21

NAFLD Score 2

39.18±31.21

32.5

13.25-57.75

33.75

Table 7 shows Kruskal Wallis test of median value of Gensini showing a significant difference between the three groups formed by the NAFLD 0, 1 and 2 with H value of 10.05 which attained a significance level of p of 0.007. The highest Mean and Median were in the NAFLD stage 1 with a mean value of 44±12.38 and Median value of 43.5 followed by stage 2 with a mean value of 39.18±31.21 and median of 32.5

Table 8

Mann Whitney comparison between NAFLD 0 and 1

Gensini Score Mean ± SD

Median

IQR

Mean Rank

Mann-Whitney U

p

NAFLD score 0

19.72±23.18

10.75

2.25-40

11.64

38.5

0.003

NAFLD score 1

44±12.38

43.5

32.25-55.25

21.29

Table 8 shows Mann Whitney comparison between NAFLD 0 and 1.

Table 9

Mann Whitney comparison between NAFLD 0 and 2

Gensini Score Mean ± SD

Median

IQR

Mean Rank

Mann-Whitney U

p

NAFLD score 0

19.72±23.18

10.75

2.25-40

18.89

169

0.01

NAFLD score 2

39.18±31.21

32.5

13.25-57.75

29.22

Table 9 shows Mann Whitney comparison between NAFLD 0 and 2.

Table 10

Mann Whitney comparison between NAFLD 1 and 2

Gensini Score Mean ± SD

Median

IQR

Mean Rank

Mann-Whitney U

p

NAFLD score 1

44±12.38

43.5

32.25-55.25

26.42

145

0.2

NAFLD score 2

39.18±31.21

32.5

13.25-57.75

21.03

Table 10 shows Mann Whitney comparison between NAFLD 1 and 2 showed a non-significant difference between groups with a p value of 0.2.

Discussion

In our study the mean and median age was 54.6±10.34 and 57 yrs respectively. This was similar to findings by, Sharma et al (54.71±19.9 years) (17) Risk of CAD increases with age. 17

In our study, 71% of patients have NAFLD, among which the highest proportion is formed by the NAFLD group 2 constituting 51.6% (n=64) followed by NAFLD 1 constituting 19.4 %. (n=24). No NAFLD was found in 29% of patients. None of the patient in our study group had stage 3 NAFLD. This is corroborated in study by Majumder et al where 36/150 (24%) patients constituted no NAFLD. 18

Our study shows a predominant male population of patients constituting 83.9% (n=104) of population. Risk of CAD is more in male patients. This was also seen in study by Sharma et al where males constituted 79.5 % of the total patients. 19 The difference in sex noted was due to effects of oestrogen in women. 20, 21

Spearman’s Rho analysis of mean Gensini with different continuous variables shows only significant negative association with creatinine with a coefficient of -0.25 which was found to be significant with a p of 0.04. This is in contrast to studies by Cerne et al. 22 The difference may be due to exclusion of patient with abnormal creatinine from the study to avoid contrast induced nephropathy

Chi square test of Gensini less than 20 and more than equal to 20 with NAFLD Grade 0,1 and 2 shows a significant association of chi square value of 15.26 which is significant with a p value of <0.001. Kruskalwallis test of median value of Gensini showing a significant difference between the three groups formed by the NAFLD 0, 1 and 2 with H value of 10.05 which attained a significance of p value of 0.007.

Mann Whitney comparison between NAFLD 0 and 1 shows a significant difference which attained a p value of 0.003. Comparison between NAFLD 0 and 2 shows a significant difference with a p value of 0.01. However, comparison between NAFLD 1 and 2 shows a non-significant difference between groups with a p value of 0.2.

Patients with NAFLD patients had significantly higher Gensini value (90.2±40.0 vs. 36.4±28.9) than participants without NAFLD (p<0.001) as reported by Alper et al. In their study, the degree of NAFLD were significantly correlated with the severity of CAD. 23

Arslan et al showed that the relative risk of the presence of CAD was 6.73 times higher in patients with NAFLD than in patients without it (p=0.035). The presence of NAFLD was an independent factor for the presence and severity of CAD. 24

Studies by Wong et al showed NAFLD prevalence of 58.2% while significant CAD was observed in 76.0% of patients. It was observed in their study that NAFLD is associated independently with CAD. 25

Most accepted hypothesis establishing relationship between CAD and NAFLD suggest inflammatory conditions accompanied with increased reactive oxygen species, adipocytokines as the most important factors leading to atherosclerosis and hepatic steatosis. 26, 27 Our study indicates NAFLD as a risk factor for CAD proven angiographically. Further large-scale studies are needed to explain the mechanism of this relationship, and to identify the measures which can be taken in order to prevent future occurrence of CAD.

Conclusion

Presence of NAFLD is associated with a more severe form of coronary artery disease compared to the participants without NAFLD. But the presence of a higher grade of NAFLD does not mandate a higher Gensini score. USG guided diagnosis of NAFLD presence is a more practical, easily available and non-invasive tool for predicting higher Gensini category (≥20) in Patients of CAD undergoing coronary angiogram. Though CT Scan abdomen / fibroscan / Liver Histology, which are more accurate modalities for diagnosis of NAFLD were not done in my patient subgroup which was a limitation in our study.

Source of Funding

No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

1 

R Lozano M Naghavi K Foreman S Lim K Shibuya V Aboyans Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease StudyLancet20103809859209512810.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0

2 

JX Moore N Chaudhary Akinyemiju T Metabolic syndrome prevalence by race/ethnicity and sex in the United States, national health and nutrition examination surveyPrev Chronic Dis2017141988201210.5888/pcd14.160287

3 

C H Chen C K Nien C C Yang Y H Yeh Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and coronary artery calcificationDig Dis Sci201055617526010.1007/s10620-009-0935-9

4 

AC Tuyama CY Chang Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseJ Diabetes20124326680

5 

A Mantovani E Scorletti A Mosca A Alisi CD Byrne G Targher Complications, morbidity and mortality of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseMetabolism2020111S15417010.1016/j.metabol.2020.154170

6 

A Ismaiel N Al Srouji Subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction assessed using myocardial strain measured by speckle tracking in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - systematic reviewGlob J Med Berap2020221810.46982/gjmt.2020.104

7 

G Targher CP Day E Bonora Risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseNew Engl J Med20103631413415010.1056/NEJMra0912063

8 

A Gastaldelli M Kozakova K Hojlund A Flyvbjerg A Favuzzi A Mitrakou Fatty liver is associated with insulin resistance, risk of coronary heart disease, and early atherosclerosis in a large European populationHepatology2009495153744

9 

G Targher G Arcaro Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and increased risk of cardiovascular diseaseAtherosclerosis200719122354010.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.08.021

10 

BK Lauridsen S Stender TS Kristensen Liver fat content, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and ischaemic heart disease: mendelian randomization and meta-analysis of 279 013 individualsEur Heart J20183953859310.1093/eurheartj/ehx662

11 

GG Gensini A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart diseaseAm J Cardiol198351360610.1016/s0002-9149(83)80105-2

12 

SH Saverymuttu AE Joseph JD Maxwell Ultrasound scanning in the detection of hepatic fibrosis and steatosisBr Med J (Clin Res Ed)19862926512135

13 

Y Yajima K Ohta T Narui R Abe H Suzuki M Ohtsuki Ultrasonographical diagnosis of fatty liver: significance of the liver-kidney contrastTohoku J Exp Med198313914350

14 

WHO, Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry - Report of a WHO Expert Committee 1995

15 

PK Whelton RM Carey WS Aronow C DE Jr KJ Collins C Dennison Himmelfarb PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice GuidelinesHypertension2017716126932410.1161/HYP.0000000000000066

16 

American Diabetic Association. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes MellitusDiabetes care2013361677410.2337/dc13-S067

17 

AM Aydın A Kayalı AK Poyraz The relationship between coronary artery disease and pericoronary epicardial adipose tissue thicknessJ Int Med Res20154311725

18 

B Majumder V Tandel S Ghosh S Chatterjee Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and coronary artery diseaseInt J Res Med Sci2016410435964

19 

RB Singh JP Sharma V Rastogi RS Raghuvanshi M Moshiri SP Verma Prevalence of coronary artery disease and coronary risk factors in rural and urban populations of north IndiaEur Heart J1997181117283510.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015167

20 

J Rossouw Estrogens for prevention of coronary heart diseaseCirculation199694112982510.1161/01.cir.94.11.2982

21 

HW Lennep HT Westerveld A Zwinderman JE Roeters van Lennep HB Slot DW Erkelens Differential effect of female gender on coronary artery disease and peripheral artery diseaseNeth Heart J200210125005

22 

D Cerne S Kaplan-Pavlovcic I Kranjec G Jurgens Mildly elevated serum creatinine concentration correlates with the extent of coronary atherosclerosisRen Fail200022679980810.1081/jdi-100101965

23 

A T Alper H Hasdemir S Sahin E Onturk A Akyol Z Nurkalem The relationship between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the severity of coronary artery disease in patients with metabolic syndromeTurk Kardiyol Dern Ars200836637681

24 

U Arslan S Türkoğlu T Karakan A Çengel Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and coronary artery diseaseCoron Artery Dis2007186433610.1097/MCA.0b013e3282583c0d

25 

VW Wong GL Wong GW Yip AO Lo J Limquiaco WC Chu Coronary artery disease and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseGut201160121721710.1136/gut.2011.242016

26 

G Targher L Bertolini R Padovani S Rodella G Zoppini L Zenari Relations between carotid artery wall thickness and liver histology in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseDiabetes Care200629613253010.2337/dc06-0135

27 

D M Torres S A Harrison Diagnosis and therapy of non alcoholic steatohepatitisGastroenterology2008134616829810.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.077



jats-html.xsl

© 2022 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)