Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 364

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 112


Sahu, Inamdar I F, and Sahu: Medical student’s attitude towards serving rural areas: A cross sectional study in Maharashtra, India


Introduction

Access to health is a basic human right but there are widened health gaps between different countries, within country and among social groups.1 Health status of rural people are poor, and they do not have access to the same range of healthcare services as urban communities.2 74% of graduate doctors living in urban areas serve only 28% of national population while rural population remains largely underserved. This disparity of health care in rural areas is only going to increase in future.3

Across the country, rural public health facilities failing to attract, retain, and ensure regular presence of highly trained medical professionals.4 Thus this study was carried out to determine the attitude of medical students towards serving rural areas and to explore reasons behind willingness and unwillingness to work in rural areas.

Materials and Methods

It was a cross-sectional study conducted over the period of 6 months from June to December 2012 at Nanded city, Maharashtra. Nanded is the second largest urban center in the Marathwada region, after Aurangabad in Maharashtra. There are three medical colleges in the Nanded city (one Allopathic, one Ayurvedic and one Homeopathic). Among these, two medical colleges (one Allopathic and one Ayurvedic) were selected by simple random sampling using lottery method. All 450 undergraduate medical students from first year to final year and interns in both selected medical colleges were included into the study. In the case of the students who were absent at the time of first session, mop up round was undertaken to cover the remaining subjects.

All medical students from first year to final year and internees were included in the study. Medical students not giving voluntary consent to participate in the study were excluded from study.

The subjects were clearly told about the aims and objectives of the study. They were requested to fill the proforma with full assurance about the confidentiality and anonymity of their information. The subjects were assured that the data would be used only for scientific purpose of the study. Informed consent was obtained from the study subjects. The students were asked to complete the questionnaire in a class at the end of lecture and returned them to author in the same session.

Information regarding socio demographic characteristics, preference of medical students regarding place of practice, factors associated with their preference of place of practice and reasons behind willingness and unwillingness to practice in rural areas were collected using self-administrated questionnaire to the medical students.

Data was entered into SPSS 16 software and analyzed. Association was tested between preference of place of practice and socio-demographic and other associated factors using Chi square test. p value < 0.05 was considers as statistically significant.

Results

Among 450 medical students only 416 completely answered the questionnaire. Thus, response rate was (92.44%). 183(44%) students were from Ayurvedic college and 233(56%) students were from allopathic college.

Socio-demographic profile of medical students

Majority 225(54.1%) students were from 20 – 24 years age group including student’s 101(55.2%) from Ayurveda and 124(53.2%) from Allopathy. Females constituted 219(52.6%) of all students. 993(50.8%) females were studying in Ayurvedic College while 126(54.1%) were from Allopathic College. Only 18(4.3%) students were married and 398(95.7%) were unmarried. 306(73.6%) student were Hindu, 65(15.6%) were Muslim and 34(8.2%) were Buddha by religion. 314(75.5%) students belong to nuclear family and 102(24.5%) from joint family. Majority students were from well-educated family. 275(66.1%) had father’s education while 97(23.3%) had maternal education above graduation level. (Table 1)

Table 1

Socio-demographic profile of medical students

Socio-demographic Variables

Ayurveda (%) 183(44)

Allopathy (%) 233(56)

Total (%) 416(100)

Year of undergraduation

1st year

42 (23.0)

49 (21.0)

91(21.88)

2nd year

47 (25.7)

49 (21.0)

96(23.08)

Final year

46(33.8)

90(66.2)

36(32.7)

Intern

48 (26.2)

45 (19.3)

93(22.36)

Age

≤ 19 years

68 (37.2)

87 (37.3)

155(37.3)

20 – 24 years

101 (55.2)

124 (53.2)

225(54.1)

≥ 25 years

14 (7.7)

22 (9.4)

036(8.7)

Fathers education

Illiterate

7(3.8)

3(1.3)

010(2.4)

Upto Primary

3(1.6)

2(0.9)

005(1.2)

Secondary

22(12)

22(9.4)

044(10.6)

HSC/ Intermediate

39(21.3)

43(18.5)

082(19.7)

Graduate and above

112(61.2)

163(70.0)

275(66.1)

Mothers education

Illiterate

27(14.8)

15(6.4)

042(10.1)

Upto Primary

6(3.3)

8(3.4)

014(3.4)

Secondary

71(38.8)

98(42.1)

169(40.6)

HSC/ Intermediate

46(25.1)

48(20.6)

094(22.6)

Graduate and above

33(18)

64(27.5)

097(23.3)

Place of primary education

Rural

66 (36.1%)

54 (23.2%)

120(28.85)

Urban

117 (63.9%)

179 (76.8%)

296(71.15)

Preference of place of practice and factors associated with it

Majority 267 (64.18%) medical students wish to practice at urban areas while 149 (35.82%) students were interested in working at rural areas. Among Ayurveda around 45% students were interested in working rural areas as compared to only 27% students from Allopathy. (Figure 1)

Figure 1

Preference of place of medical practice by study subject

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/dec862e3-efa1-4fbd-836d-a0a315d0f1fbimage1.png

Among medical students, significantly higher numbers of students of Ayurveda were interested in working at rural areas as compared to students from Allopathy, while preference towards rural practice significantly decreases from first to final year of undergraduation. Age, father’s education, mother’s education, place of residence and place of primary education of medical students had association with their preference towards rural practice. (Table 2)

Table 2

Factors associated with preference of place of practice by medical students

Socio-demographic variable

Place of practice (n – 416)

p value (1)

p value (2)

Rural (%)

Urban (%)

Speciality

Ayurveda

84(45.9%)

99(54.1%)

<0.0001

-

Allopathy

65(27.9%)

168(72.1%)

Year of under-graduation

I year

43(47.3%)

48(52.7%)

<0.0001

<0.0001

II year

46(47.9%)

50(52.1%)

Final year

43(31.6%)

93(68.4%)

Interns

17(18.3%)

76(81.7%)

Age

≤ 19 years

70(45.2%)

85(54.8%)

0.002

0.0004

20 – 24 years

73(32.4%)

152(67.6%)

≥ 25 years

06(16.7%)

30(83.3%)

Fathers Education

Illiterate

08(80.0%)

02(20.0%)

0.0004

< 0.0001

Upto primary

02(40%)

03(60%)

Secondary

25(56.82%)

19(43.18%)

HSC/intermediate

30(36.6%)

52(63.4%)

Graduate and above

84(30.55%)

191(69.45%)

Mothers education

Illiterate

20(47.6%)

22(52.4%)

< 0.0001

<0.001

Upto primary

11(78.6%)

03(21.4%)

Secondary

58(34.32%)

111(65.68%)

HSC/intermediate

39(41.5%)

55(58.5%)

Graduate and above

21(21.65%)

76(78.35%)

Place of pri.edu.

Rural

70 (58.3%)

50 (41.7%)

<0.0001

-

Urban

79 (26.7%)

217 (73.3%)

Residence

Rural

69(57.5%)

51(42.5%)

<0.0001

-

Urban

80(27%)

216(73%)

[i] 1 - (χ2 test), 2 - (χ2 test for trend)

Binary logistic regression analysis between sociodemographic characteristic and preference of place of practice reported by medical students

The above associations concluded by chi square and chi square trend test were further examined through binary logistic regressions by taking rural or urban areas as preference of place of practice as a dependent variable and medical student’s sociodemographic characteristic as a covariate (independent variables).

Table 3

Binary logistic regression analysis between sociodemographic characteristic and preference of place of practice reported by medical students

Characteristics

B

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower

Upper

Speciality

.795

.245

10.558

1

.001

2.214

1.371

3.576

Year of undergraduation

.016

.161

.009

1

.923

1.016

.741

1.392

Age

-.212

.104

4.117

1

.042

.809

.659

.993

Sex

-.056

.249

.050

1

.822

.946

.580

1.542

Type of family

.681

.269

6.389

1

.011

1.976

1.165

3.349

Marital status

.785

.592

1.756

1

.185

2.192

.687

6.999

Religion

.280

.128

4.816

1

.028

1.324

1.030

1.700

Residence

.036

.355

.010

1

.919

1.037

.517

2.080

Fathers education

-.135

.109

1.558

1

.212

.873

.706

1.080

Mothers education

-.013

.093

.019

1

.890

.987

.823

1.184

Medical professional relative

.131

.240

.300

1

.584

1.140

.712

1.826

Place of primary education

1.067

.342

9.769

1

.002

2.908

1.489

5.680

Socioeconomic status

-.121

.147

.677

1

.411

.886

.664

1.182

Table 4

Reasons behind willingness to practice in rural area

Reasons behind willingness in practicing at rural area

No. of medical students (%) (n-149)

Social service

70(47.0%)

To gain experience

18(12.1%)

Near to home

15(10.1%)

Easy to settle

14(9.4%)

Less competition in practice

10(6.7%)

Get time to study for PG entrance

09(6.0%)

Less workload in rural areas

07(4.7%)

Less stressful work

06(4.0%)

Total

149(100%)

Table 5

Reasons behind unwillingness to practice in rural area

Reasons behind unwillingness to practice in rural area

No. of medical students (%)

(n-267)

Scarcity of health facilities

89(33.3%)

Less money

49(18.4%)

Bad living conditions

41(15.4%)

No scope to learn advance technique

19(7.1%)

Non cooperative people

17(6.4%)

Less safety

17(6.4%)

Less experience

15(5.6%)

Away from friends, family and relatives

11(4.1%)

Communication problem

09(3.4%)

Odds Ratio along with levels of significance of regression models for preference of place of practice were shown in Table 3. A significant association was found between preference of place of practice and medical students characteristics namely, type of medical speciality, age, religion, type of family, and place of primary education. (Table 3)

Reasons behind willingness to practice in rural area

Social service 70(47.0%) and to gain experience 18(12.1%) were commonest reasons students being interested in working rural area. Easy to settle 14(9.4%), get time to study for PG 09(6.0%), less workload 07(4.7%) and less stress 06(4.0%) were other common reason behind willingness of medical students towards rural practice. (Table 4)

Reasons behind unwillingness to practice in rural area

Scarcity of health facilities 89(33.3%), less money 49(18.4%) and bad living conditions 41(15.4%) were recognised as major reasons for negative attitude of medical students towards rural practice. No scope to learn advance technique 19(7.1%), noncooperative people 17(6.4%), less safety 17(6.4%) and less experience 15(5.6%) were other factors due to which medical students not favour to work at rural areas. (Table 5)

Discussion

Around the world, the health status of people in rural areas is generally worse than in urban areas. Even in countries where the majority of the population lives in rural areas, the resources are concentrated on the cities.5

In present study, medical students revealed a slightly negative attitude toward working in rural areas. Only one third (35.82%) students were in favor of working in rural areas. Wide variation was noted among choice of medical students regarding place of practice in different countries. Preference of Indian medical students towards rural practice ranges from 29% in Goa, 6 33.8% in Delhi, 7 44% in Karnataka 8 to 55.95% at Haryana. 9 In contrast to Indian studies, majority of medical students from Nigeria, 10 Uganda 11 and Nepal 12 prefer to serve rural areas as compared to urban one. Thus, it is needed to understand differences in rural health care policies in these countries and India from doctor’s point of view.

Rural background and primary education at rural areas were identified as the strong variable associated with the retention of health professionals in rural communities by various literatures.7, 10, 13, 14 This can be explained by the familiarity of medical students with rural setting and cultural norms. We observed that medical students with well-educated parents had less favourable attitude towards working at rural areas similar to study conducted by Saini et al.7 and Singh et al. 14 Medical students from Ist and IInd years of undergraduation showed more willingness to work in rural area may be because of poor knowledge regarding working conditions in rural area. 14

For the medical students who were interested to work in rural area, the major reason for that decision was to provide service to the poor/underprivileged (social service) as there is scarcity of health care facilities in rural area. Similar finding was reported from various literatures in India6, 7 and other countries like Nigeria 15 and Uganda 16 where the major reasons were to provide medical services to the poor and the vulnerable respectively. In study by Dutt et al. 8 medical students wish to work in rural area to gain experience, to get postgraduate seat and for monitory benefits.

The reasons for not willing to work in a rural area included scarcity of health facilities, less money and bad living conditions. Many studies had mentioned a similar list of common factors which revealed the role of government in improving working conditions in rural areas.7, 8, 16, 17 This to an extent paints the same picture of other rural and underserved areas of the world with regards to health service delivery and the need for concerted action in-order to improve delivery of services and patient care in these areas.

Conclusion

Majority of the medical students participated in this study were unwilling to practice in rural area after their qualification. Interest towards rural practice is significantly higher among Ayurveda students and students from rural background. Lack of social amenities, scarcity of health facilities, bad living conditions and inadequate remuneration emerged as potential barriers to students opting for a career in rural health. These findings suggest us about the attitude of medical students to rural health care and explore various factors such as rural residence which have influencing role for intending medical students towards rural practice.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

J Thayyil M C Jeeja Issues of creating a new cadre of doctors for rural IndiaInt J Med Public Health201331811

2 

AK Chillimuntha KR Thakor JS Mulpuri Disadvantaged rural health - Issues and Challenges: A ReviewNational J Med Res201331802

3 

K Yadav P Jarhyan V Gupta C S Pandav Revitalizing rural health care delivery: Can rural health practitioners be the answer?Indian J Community Med200934135

4 

L Bhandari S Dutta Health Infrastructure in Rural India. [Cited on 12 April 2016]http://www.iitk.ac.in/3inetwork/html/reports/IIR2007/11-Health.pdf

5 

R Strasser Rural health around the world: challenges and solutionsFam Pract20032044576310.1093/fampra/cmg422

6 

A C Jagadish C Sissy O Annet A cross sectional study of attitudes among Goan doctors towards rural serviceJ Evol Med Dent Sci20154661146873

7 

NK Saini R Sharma R Roy R Verma What impedes working in rural areas? A study of aspiring doctors in the National Capital Region, India. Rural and Remote Health2012121967

8 

R A Dutt S Shivalli M B Bhat J R Padubidri Attitudes and perceptions toward rural health care service among medical studentsMed J DY Patil Univ2014767038

9 

V Sharma N Gupta N C Rao Perception towards serving rural population amongst interns from dental colleges of HaryanaJ Clin Diagn Res2014893132

10 

W R Brieger Attitude of Nigerian medical students towards rural practiceJ Med Educ19795454279

11 

D K Kaye A Mwanika P Sekimpi J Tugumisirize N Sewankambo Perceptions of newly admitted undergraduate medical students on experiential training on community placements and working in rural areas of UgandaBMC Med Educ2010104710.1186/1472-6920-10-47

12 

PR Shankar TP Thapa Student perception about working in rural Nepal after graduation: a study among first- and second-year medical studentsHum Resour Health2012102710.1186/1478-4491-10-27

13 

D M Silvestri M Blevins A R Afzal B Andrews M Derbew S Kaur Medical and nursing students’ intentions to work abroad or in rural areas: a cross-sectional survey in Asia and AfricaBull World Health Organ20149210750910.2471/BLT.14.136051

14 

R K Singh Cms Rawat S Pandey Attitude of medical students toward serving in rural areas and its determinants: a cross-sectional study from UttarakhandInt J Med Sci Public Health2015468147

15 

E N Ossai U C Anyanwagu B N Azuogu K A Uwakwe N Ekeke N Ibiok Perception about working in rural area after graduation and associated factors: A study among final year medical students in medical schools of southeast NigeriaBr J Med Med Res201582192205

16 

G Wandira E Maniple Do Ugandan medical students intend to work in rural health facilities after training? Health policy and developmentHealth Policy Devt 20097320314

17 

V Gaikwad Sudeepa S Madhukumar A study on career preferences and attitude towards the rural health services among the graduating interns of a medical college in Bangalore ruralInt J Biol Med Res201232157780



jats-html.xsl

© 2022 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)