Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 181

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 381


Gupta, Kumari, Chauhan, and Bhatia: To compare effects of pretreatment with two doses of dexmedetomidine on etomidate induced myoclonus and attenuation of stress response at intubation


Introduction

Etomidate is a carboxylatedimidazole-derived, sedative hypnotic agent. It acts directly on GABA Receptor Complex, blocking neuroexcitation and producing anaesthesia. When introduced in 1973, it was considered a novel induction agent with a stable cardiovascular profile and minimal respiratory side effects and is still widely used for hemodynamically unstable patients.1

Etomidate’s haemodynamic stability is due to its unique lack of effect on the sympathetic nervous system and on baroreceptor function. Even in cardiac patients an induction dose of etomidate results in very stable haemodynamics. Etomidate also has minimal effects on respiratory system as compared to other induction agents. Since it causes minimal histamine release, this gives an advantage in patients with reactive airway disease, making it less likely that they will have bronchospasm. However, pain on injection and myoclonus are two most common side effects of this drug. 2 Pain on injection has disappeared after the new fat emulsion of etomidate, but the new solvent has not reduced the incidence of myoclonus. 3

A variety of drugs have been used in the past to decrease the incidence of myoclonus like

  1. Opiods- Fentanyl, Sufentanyl, Alfentanyl and Remifentany 4, 5, 6, 7

  2. Benzodiazapines – Midazolam 8, 9, 10

  3. Magnesium Sulphate 11

  4. Alpha 2 agonists-Dexmedetomidine 1, 9, 12

Objectives

  1. To compare the effects of pretreatment with two doses of Dexmedetomidine on the incidence of Etomidate induced myoclonus using numerical based grading.

  2. To compare the effects of pretreatment with two doses of Dexmedetomidine on attenuation of stress response at laryngoscopy and intubation after induction with Etomidate.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The proposed study was carried out in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care at a tertiary care teaching hospital, after seeking clearance from the college ethical committee and obtaining written informed consent from patient.

Study design

Prospective Interventional Randomized Comparative Study

Study period

1 Year.

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients of 18-65 years of age of either sex of ASA grade 1 and 2 undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included in study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with history suggesting allergy to any of the study medications, anticipated difficult airway, known Psychiatric disorder, sepsis/systemic infections, pacemaker/on Beta Blockers/with Heart Blocks and Pregnancy.

Results

The present study “To compare the effects of pretreatment with two doses of Dexmedetomidine on Etomidate induced myoclonus and attenuation of stress response at intubation” was conducted in the Operation Theatres in the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, at a tertiary care teaching hospital after obtaining clearance from ethical committee.

It was a prospective and interventional randomized comparative study where 180 patients with age group 18-65 years, of either sex, ASA grade I & II, BMI, undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation were included in the study. They were divided into three groups where patients were randomly allocated into one of the three groups using Block Randomization with sealed envelope system.

Group 1 (n=60): This group received 10 ml Saline followed by Inj. Etomidate (0.3 mg/Kg).

Group 2(n=60): This group received pretreatment with Inj. Dexmedetomidine (0.5µg/Kg) in 10ml Saline followed by Inj. Etomidate (0.3 mg/Kg).

Group 3 (n=60): This group received pretreatment with Inj. Dexmedetomidine (1µg/Kg) in 10ml Saline followed by Inj. Etomidate (0.3 mg/Kg).

The intensity of myoclonus was grarded as follows

0-No myoclonus, 1- mild myoclonus, 2- moderate and 3- severe myocyonus.

In this study, there was no significant differences among three groups regarding age, weight, sex and ASA physical status.

In our study, incidence of myoclonus was maximum in Group 1(70%) while 47 out of 60 patients (78.3%) in Group 2 and 46 out of 60 patients (76.6%) in Group 3 had no myoclonus. It is shown in Table 2.

In our study, majority of patients in Group 1 had grade 2 myoclonus (31.67%), 30% had no myoclonus and 13.3% patients had grade 3 myoclonus compared to patients who were pretreated with dexmedetomidine. In Group 2 and 3 none of the patients had grade 3 myoclonus. Thus, showing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in reducing incidence and severity of etomidate induced myoclonus as shown in Table 3.

Stress response to intubation was also attenuated in dexmedetomidine group. Both Heart rate and Systolic Bp were less post intubation in patients who were pretreated with injection dexmedetomidine compared to group 1 asFigure 1, Figure 2.

Table 1

Comparison of age distribution between the groups

Group

Total

P value

1

2

3

Age

<=20

6 (10.00%)

3 (5.00%)

7 (11.67%)

16 (8.89%)

0.327

21-30

11 (18.33%)

18 (30.00%)

16 (26.67%)

45 (25.00%)

31-40

17 (28.33%)

13 (21.67%)

16 (26.67%)

46 (25.56%)

41-50

10 (16.67%)

17 (28.33%)

15 (25.00%)

42 (23.33%)

51-60

15 (25.00%)

8 (13.33%)

6 (10.00%)

29 (16.11%)

>60

1 (1.67%)

1 (1.67%)

0 (0.00%)

2 (1.11%)

Total

60 (100.00%)

60 (100.00%)

60 (100.00%)

180 (100.00%)

Table 2

Incidence of myoclonus

Group

Total

P value

1

2

3

Myoclonus

No

18(30.00%)

47(78.33%)

46(76.67%)

111(61.67%)

<0.0001

Yes

42(70.00%)

13(21.67%)

14(23.33%)

69(38.33%)

Total

60(100.00%)

60(100.00%)

60(100.00%)

180(100.00%)

Table 3

Distribution of myoclonus grade.

Grade of myoclonus

1

2

3

P value

0

18(30.00%)

47(78.33%)

46(76.67%)

1

10(16.67%)

9(15.00%)

11(18.33%)

2

19(31.67%)

4(6.67%)

3(5.00%)

<0.0001

3

13(21.67%)

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

Total

60(100%)

60(100%)

60(100%)

Figure 1

HR Trend

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/39be1a33-0c9a-4bb3-a32d-d321e09a5f1f/image/3d04f2e8-6ed0-408a-bf43-6ea5cc3bdff5-uimage.png

Figure 2

Systolic blood pressure trend

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/39be1a33-0c9a-4bb3-a32d-d321e09a5f1f/image/9db65172-ae23-46af-b510-150f6d220da7-uimage.png

Discussion

In this prospective randomized clinical study, we compared the effects of pretreatment with two doses of dexmedetomidine on the incidence of etomidate induced myoclonus and attenuation of stress response at intubation. This study was conducted in 180 adult patients (18-65 years) of ASA I or II undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. These patients were randomly allocated to three groups, with each group having 60 patients each. Several studies have reported incidence of myoclonus in 50-80% patients receiving etomidate. 1, 13, 14

Doenicke et al showed higher doses of etomidate were correlated with increased frequency of myoclonus, which was 83% with 0.3mg/kg etomidate. None of the patients had myoclonus in doses under 0.005 mg/kg. 13

Mizrak et al (2010) concluded that pretreatment with dexmedetomidine or thiopental is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonic muscle movements. Incidence of myoclonus was significantly low in Dexmedetomidine (0.5µg/kg) and Thiopental (1mg/kg) groups (34%,36%) than in control groups (64%) (p<0.05). 12

Gunes Y et al (2010) conducted a study in 152 patients to compare effect of midazolam and dexmedetomidine for prevention of etomidate induced myoclonus and pain. They randomly allocated the patients into 3 groups, pretreated either with saline, or midazolam 0.5mg/kg or dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg and concluded that both groups pretreated with midazolam and dexmedetomidine showed significantly lower incidence of myoclonus as compared to group pretreated with saline. 37% patients in group pretreated with midazolam, 30% in group pretreated with dexmedtomidine and 90%in group pretreated with saline had myoclonus. 15

Swarnendudey et al(2018) investigated effect of midazolam (0.015mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0.5µg/kg) in prevention of etomidate induced myoclonus in 80 adult patients. Incidence of myoclonus was much less in group receiving dexmedetomidine (45%) as compared to midazolam (52.5%). They also concluded that dexmedetomidine provides greater attenuation of stress response than midazolam. 10

Sulaiman et al in 2012 studied the effects of dexmedetomidine on attenuation of stress response to endotracheal intubation. They concluded that dexmedetomidine provides good control of hemodynamics during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5 mcg/kg as 10min infusion was administered prior to induction of general anaesthesia attenuated he sympathetic response to laryngoscopy and intubationin patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. 16

Menda et al used dexmedetomidine in a dose of 1µg/Kg over 15 minutes before induction, to study its effects on attenuation of haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation, found that the heart rate was significantly lower at all times as compared to the baseline values in the intraoperative period. 17

Scheinin et al (1992) concluded that dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal responses to tracheal intubation and reduces the need for thiopentone and peroperative fentanyl. 18

Koroglu et al. reported that a high dose of dexmedetomidine (bolus of 2-3µg/kg over 10 min or infusion of 1.5-3µg/kg/hr) in children undergoing MRI led to bradycardia in 16% of patients. 19

H.F.Laun et al in their study reported incidence of bradycardia in group pretreated with dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg was significantly higher than groups using saline and dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg. In their study 24% patients in group III, 6.7% in group II, 0% in group I had bradycardia. 1

Conclusions

  1. Incidence and severity of etomidate induced myoclonus was signifinicantly lesser in patients who received pretreatment with dexmedetomidine compared to patients who received saline.

  2. Both the doses (0.5µg/kg and 1µg/kg) dexmedetomidine are equally effective in prevention of incidence and severity of myoclonus induced by etomidate.

  3. Compared to patients who received saline, pretreatment with dexmedetomidine (0.5µg/kg and 1µg/kg) attenuates the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

  4. Both the doses (0.5µg/kg and 1µg/kg) dexmedetomidine are comparable in attenuation of stress response during laryngoscpy and intubation.

  5. Side effects like bradycardia and hypotension were more with dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg compared to 0.5µg/kg dexmedetomidine.

Source of Funding

No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

1 

HF Luan ZB Zhao JY Feng JZ Cui XB Zhang P Zhu Prevention of etomidate induced myoclonus during anesthetic induction by pretreatment with dexmedetomidineBraz J Med Biol Res20154821869010.1590/1414-431X20144100

2 

A Doenicke M F Roizen A E Nebauer A Kugler R Hoernecke H Beger-Hintzen A comparison of two formulations for etomidate, 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HPCD) and propylene glycolAnesth Analg1994795933910.1213/00000539-199411000-00020

3 

J M Bergen D C Smith A Review of Etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency departmentJ Emerg Med19971522213010.1016/s0736-4679(96)00350-2

4 

R J Stockham T H Stanley N L Pace S Gillmor F Groen P Hilkens Fentanyl pretreatment modifies anaesthetic induction with etomidateAnaesth Intensive Care1988162171610.1177/0310057X8801600207

5 

L Heuter K Schwarzkopf M Simon D Bredle H Fritz Pretreatment with Sufentanyl reduces myoclonus after etomidateActa Anaesthesiol Scand2003474482410.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00081.x

6 

S N Khalil K S Lawson C L Hanis N A Lemak R S Ruiz Alfentanil decreases myoclonus caused by EtomidateMiddle East J19991518592

7 

E Kelsaka D Karakaya B Sarihasan S Baris Remifentanil pretreatment reduces myoclonus After etomidateJ Clin Anesth200618283610.1016/j.jclinane.2005.05.004

8 

L Huter T Schreiber M Gugel K Schwarzkopf Low-dose intravenous midazolam reduces etomidate-induced myoclonus: A prospective, randomized study in patients undergoing elective cardioversionAnesth Analg20071055129830210.1213/01.ane.0000287248.25610.c0

9 

KR Schwarzkopf L Hueter M Simon HG Fritz Midazolam pretreatment reduces etomidate-induced myoclonic movementsAnaesth Intensive Care2003311182010.1177/0310057X0303100103

10 

S Dey M Kumar comparison of pretreatment with dexmedetomidine with midazolam for prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus and attenuation of stress response at intubation: A randomized controlled studyJ Anaesthesiol Clin201834194810.4103/joacp.JOACP_297_16

11 

A Guler T Satilmis S B Akinci B Celebioglu M Kanbak Magnesium sulfate pretreatment reduces myoclonus after etomidateAnesth Analg2005101370590.1213/01.ANE.0000160529.95019.E6

12 

A Mizrak S Koruk M Bilgi B Kocamer I Erkutlu S Ganidagli Pretreatment withDexmedetomidine or thiopental decreases myoclonus after etomidate: a randomized, double-blind controlled trialJ Surg Res20101591e11610.1016/j.jss.2009.07.031

13 

AW Doenicke MF Roizen J Kugler H Kroll J Foss P Ostwald Reducing Myoclonus after EtomidateAnesthesiology199990113910.1097/00000542-199901000-00017

14 

MM Ghoneim T Yamada Etomidate: a clinical and electroencephalographic comparison with thiopentalAnesth Analg19775644798510.1213/00000539-197707000-00003

15 

Y Gunes S Aktolga M Gündüz G Isik A comparison of midazolam or dexmedetomidine for the prevention of myoclonic movements and injection pain following etomidate injectionJ Int Med Res20102747148

16 

SI Sulaiman RB Karthekeyan M Vakamudi AS Sundar H Ravullapalli The effects of dexmedetomidine on attenuation of stress response to endotracheal intubation in patientsundergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass graftingAnn Card Anaesth2012151394310.4103/0971-9784.91480

17 

F Menda O Koner M Sayin H Ture P Imer B Aykac Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to anesthetic induction to attenuate hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing fast-track CABGAnn Card Anaesth2012131162110.4103/0971-9784.58829

18 

B Scheinin L Lindgren T Randell H Scheinin M Scheininm Dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal responses to tracheal intubation and reduces the need for thiopentone and peroperative fentanylBr J Anaesth19926821263110.1093/bja/68.2.126

19 

A Koroglu S Demirbilek H Teksan O Sagir AK But MO Ersoy Sedative, haemodynamic and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examination: preliminary resultsBr J Anaesth2005946821410.1093/bja/aei119



jats-html.xsl

© 2022 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)