Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 241

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 1842


Soni, Sahu, and Vineeth Kumar RK: A study on clinical profile and risk factors in incisional hernia patients


Introduction

A hernia is a protrusion of a viscus or part of a viscus through an abnormal opening in the walls of its containing cavity. Incisional hernias arise through a defect in the musculofascial layers of the abdominal wall in the region of a post-operative scar. Thus they may appear anywhere in the abdominal surface.1 Incisional hernias of the abdominal wall are a frequently encountered complication in cases of open abdominal surgeries like midline laparotomies, caesarian sections etc.2 Overall Incidence ranges from 2 to 11% following abdominal surgeries and majority of them (80-95%) occur within 6 months after initial surgery.3 Wound infections, obeisity, poor healing due to malnutrition, immunosuppression or steroid therapy and surgical factors like inappropriate suture materials or incorrect suture placement were thought to be the important causative factors in the development of incisional hernia.4 In this study we aim to assess the profile of these patients with respect to various etiological factors, demographics, hernial defect features and the details of previous procedure undergone.

Objectives

To study the clinical profile of incisional hernia patients with respect to various etiological factors, distribution of cases in relation to age and sex, hernial defect characteristics, details of previous surgical procedures undergone and its complications.

Materials and Methods

52 patients admitted in Department of General Surgery were included in the study. Study was conducted during the period from August 2018 to August 2020 including all patient with incisional hernia. Pediatric cases were excluded from the study. Data of all the patients were collected from the hospital records and were compiled in a pre-designated proforma which included patient details, clinical examination, investigations, previous surgical history and its post-operative complications.

Study design

Retrospective study.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done by SPSS software v.22. Chi square test and student’s t-test were used for measuring statistical significance.

Results

A total of 52 cases were included in this study. Age group in this study ranges from 25 years to 80 years with a mean age of 48.23(SD-14.52). There were 32 females (61.54%) and 20 males (38.46%) with female to male ratio was found to be 1.6:1. Average weight of the study sample was 62.96 kg. With respect to the haemoglobin levels majority had normal levels. Eight patients (15.38%) had haemoglobin levels less than 10 gm/dL.

All the cases were evaluated ultrasonographically to assess the defect size. Average size of the defect was 7.3x6.5 cm. No gender difference was observed in the defect size. Average area of the defect was 47.45 cm2. Minimum duration for the first symptom to occur after the initial surgery was 6 months and the greatest duration was of 16 years with an average duration of 1.9 years in our study and majority of the cases had the occurrence of hernia within 1 year (n=29,55.77%). (Table 1)

Table 1

Time of presentation of hernia after surgery.

Duration

No of Cases

Percentage

Till 1 year

29

55.77

1 to 3 years

14

26.93

3 to 6 years

5

9.63

After 6 years

4

7.69

Total

52

100

Most common symptom of presentation was swelling seen in 30 cases (57.7%) as shown in the Figure 1.

Graph 1

Clinical features

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7bd22847-a36c-402f-982b-765c5373b1a1image1.png

Majority of the patients in our study did not show any history of addictions (n=40, 76.9%). Most common addiction found in the study was tobacco chewing (n=6, 11.5%) followed by alcoholism and smoking each of n=4, 7.6%. In the past illness majority of the patient suffered from Hypertension (n=22, 42.3%) followed by Diabetes Mellitus (n=12, 23.08%) and Hypothyroidism was found in 6 of the patients (11.54%) close to the prevalence of hypothyroidism in general population. 5

All the females in our study had at least 1 child birth and highest parity was 5. Mean parity was 2.69. Among them about 57.7% (n=30) of the cases had given birth to two or more children.(Table 2)

Table 2

Obstetric history (32 patients).

Parity

No. of Cases

Percentage

1

2

3.8

2

16

30.8

3

8

15.4

4

2

3.8

5

4

7.7

Total

32

61.5%

Most common site to be involved was in the midline (n=22, 42.3%) followed by infraumbilical (n=10,19.2%) as given in the Table 3.

Table 3

Site of incisional hernia

Site

Frequency

Percentage

Ileostomy Site

2

3.8

Infraumbilical

10

19.2

LSCS Site*

8

15.4

LTL Site**

2

3.8

Midline (Infra and supraumilical)

22

42.3

R Subcostal

2

3.8

R Iliac fossa

6

11.5

Total

52

100.0

[i] *Lower Segment Caesarian Section.

[ii] **Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation.

Most common previous surgery associated with incisional hernia in our study was midline laparotomy (n=20, 38.5%) as given in Table 4.

Table 4

Previously associated surgery.

Previous surgery

Frequency

Percentage

Midline Laparotomy

20

38.5

Abdominal Hysterectomy

10

19.2

LSCS

10

19.2

Appendicectomy

2

3.8

Epigastric Herniorrhaphy

2

3.8

Ileostomy Closure

2

3.8

LTL

2

3.8

Lumbar Hernia

2

3.8

Pyelolithotomy

2

3.8

Total

52

100.0

In majority of the cases in our study the previous surgery performed was Emergency type (n=38,73.1%) and routine procedures were 14 cases (26.9%) as shown in Figure 2.

Graph 2

Type of previous surgery

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7bd22847-a36c-402f-982b-765c5373b1a1image2.png

Majority of the above mentioned previous surgeries were performed under Spinal Anaesthesia (n=30, 57.7%) and the rest were under General Anaesthesia (n-22, 42.3%).

With respect to the previous surgery in our cases most common post-operative complication was surgical site infections seen in about 84.9% of the cases (n=45) and this also corresponds to the incisional hernia defect size of which all the cases with larger defect sizes had previous surgical site infections (Table 5)(p value-0.001). The next factor favoring incisional hernia formation was found to be obesity seen in 21 cases (40.38%) mainly among females (n=19, 36.54%).

Table 5

Relation between surgical site infection and defect size.

Defect Size (cm)

Surgical Site Infection

Total

Absent

Present

3

2

2

2

4

3

4

4

5

2

4

4

6

0

2

2

7

0

6

6

8

0

12

12

10

0

16

16

12

0

4

4

15

0

2

2

Total

7

52

52

The procedure which was commonly associated to surgical site infection presenting now as an incisional hernia was Emergency midline laparotomy procedure (n=17, 32.69%) as shown in Table 6 (p value-0.001).

Table 6

Relation between surgical site infection and previous associated surgery

Previous Surgery

Surgical Site Infection

Total

Absent

Present

Midline Laparotomy

3

17

20

Abdominal Hysterectomy

0

8

8

LSCS

1

9

10

Appendicectomy

0

2

2

Epigastric Herniorrhaphy

0

2

2

Ileostomy Closure

1

1

2

LTL

2

0

2

Lumbar Hernia

0

2

2

Pyelolithotomy

0

2

2

Total

7

45

52

Discussion

This is a retrospective study on 52 incisional hernia patients to assess the presenting factors and various aspects of clinical features done for a duration of two years in our institute.

There were 32 females (61.54%) and 20 males (38.46%) with female to male ratio was found to be 1.6:1. Similar results were found in study by Kumar SJG6 where females outnumbered males to the ratio of 4:1 and in Regnad et al7 it was 6:1 in favour of females as also in Garg et al.8

Table 7

Sex Distribution In incisional Hernia

Garg et al 8

Present study

Sex

No of patients

Percentage

No of patients

Percentage

Male

11

37

20

38.46

Female

19

63

32

61.54

The reason for female preponderance may be due to lax abdominal muscles because of multiple pregnancies and increased obesity in females. 9 Carlson MA et al in meta-analysis of 6266 published cases of minimally invasive ventral hernia surgery observed a mean of 55 years,10 whereas in our study it was 48.23 years. Ellis, Gajraj and George9 noticed a mean age of 49.4 years similar to that obtained in our study. The youngest patient in our study was 25 years and oldest was 80 years.

Majority of the patients presented with abdominal swelling (n=30, 58%) followed by both abdominal swelling and pain (n=20,38%). In study by Garg et al all the patients presented with swelling followed by pain and swelling (24%) similar to that in our study.8 In study by Prasad et al too where 68% presented with swelling and 24 percent presented with both pain and abdominal discomfort.11 Among the females now presented with incisional hernias the mean parity was 2.69 with highest being 5 suggestive of increased risk among multiparous women due to lax abdominal musculature as previously mentioned. About 57.7% of the females in our study group has a parity of 2 and above. Similar result was seen in study by Inamdar et al on 31 patients where more than 50% of the cases had three or more children. 12 Average defect size and average defect area are 7.3x6.5 cm and 47.45 cm2 respectively. In studies by Subramanian A et al 13 and Huda F et al14 the average area of the defect observed where 37.9±4.9 cm2 and 35.63 cm2 respectively similar to but less than that obtained in our study.

The average duration of hernia to occur after the primary surgery was 1.9 years in our study of which majority of the cases developed hernias within 1 year (n=29,55.77%) and about 26.93% of the patients developed hernia in 1 to 3 years. In study by Garg et al8 77% of incisional hernias developed within 3 years and of which 37% developed within 1 year. According to Viljanto and Vanttinen majority of the incisional hernias develop within 1 year of previous surgery and rarely after 2-3 years as proven in our study.5

In our study the associated medical conditions were found to be hypertension diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism with 42.3%, 8% and 11.54% respectively. These comorbid diseases puts these patients at a greater risk of intra as well as post-operative complications which later favours development of incisional hernia.15, 16

Most of cases of incisional hernia in our study occurred over midline (n=22, 42.3%) (Panning both infra and supraumbilical regions) at the site of incisions made for midline laparotomy (n=20.38.5%) followed by isolated infraumbilical region(n=10,19.2%), similar findings were obtained in studies by Goel TC et al17 (44.6%) and Qadri et al in which lower midline incisions were the most common site.18 In the study by Le Huu Nho et al the incidence of incisional hernia after laparotomy was 9.9% and incidence was found to be higher for midline incisions than transverse incisions (11% vs 4.7%).19 Garg et al also have obtained comparable results in which 53% and 27% of the patients underwent explorative laparotomy and LSCS respectively. 8 Most of the cases where of emergency in nature (73.1%). Umeshchandra DG et al had 70% of the cases develop incisional hernia following emergency surgery 20 and also by Bose et al(50%).21

In considering the risk factors favouring incisional hernia formation wound infection accounted for about 84.9% of the cases (n=45) in our study and this also corresponds to the incisional hernia defect size of which all the cases with larger defect sizes had previous surgical site infections. This result was comparable with the study by Bose et al in which wound infection was seen in 53.63% of cases. 21 Fischer et al placed it at 88%22 and Molley at al also noted a higher incidence of post-operative wound infection(52%). 23 The procedure which was commonly associated with surgical site infection presenting now as an incisional hernia was Emergency midline laparotomy procedure(n=17, 32.69%) followed by LSCS (n=9,17.31%) . Other studies like George et al,24 Rutkow et al,25 White et al26 and Paudel et al27 also provides similar findings.

Another risk factor found to be associated with incisional hernia formation was obesity seen in 21 cases (40.38%). Similar results were obtained in studies by Bose SM et al 21 (n=33,30%) and Garg et al 8 (n=11,37%). Study by Musca et al infers obesity accounting for herniation in 55.5%. 28 Other studies by Bedi et al., 29 Itatsu et al,30 Murray et al 31 also underscores the relation between obesity and incisional hernia formation.

Conclusions

Incisional hernia is more common in females who undergo emergency midline laparotomy and emergency caesarean section. Majority of the cases presented within 3 years and that too within 1 year of surgery. Swelling followed by pain and swelling both were the most common complaints. Post-operative wound infection, obesity and anemia were the crucial factors for the development of incisional hernias. It is an avoidable iatrogenic malady which can be prevented by proper preoperative management of patients like weight reduction and control of medical conditions, meticulous surgical technique and mainly prevention of postoperative wound infection.

Limitations of the study

This study does not take into considerations on all aspects of Incisional hernia. The study sample is small and post-operative follow-up was done only for a short duration of time. Long history of the conditions was also a hindrance in assessing the factors of the previous surgery and the patient status at the time of previous surgery due to insufficient record availability.

We are of the opinion that a long term cohort study with sufficient sample size with regular follow-up will be able to give a better picture with respect to the risk factors and progression of condition.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

NS Williams CJK Bulstrode PR O'Connell Baily and Love Short Practice of Surgery26th Edn.CRC PressBoca Raton, FL2013964

2 

TA Santora JJ Roslyn Incisional herniaSurg Clin North Am19937335577010.1016/s0039-6109(16)46037-8

3 

M Mudge IE Hughes Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudesBr J Surg198572170110.1002/bjs.1800720127

4 

PJM Cruse R Foord The epidemiology of wound infection: A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 woundsSurg Clin North Am1980601274010.1016/s0039-6109(16)42031-1

5 

J Viljanto E Vanttinen Incisional hernia in the elderly: Risk factors and clinical considerationsAnn Chir Gynaecol196837559

6 

SJG Kumar M Manangi UK Kumar KP Madhu BJ Arun N Nagaraj A clinical study of incisional hernia and managementInt Surg J2016331341410.18203/2349-2902.isj20161904

7 

JF Regnad JM Hay S Rea A Fingerhut Y Flamant JN Maillard Ventral incisional hernias : incidence, date of recurrence, localisation and risk factorsItal J Surg Sci198818325965

8 

N Garg P Batra S Bali The clinical study of the incisional hernia and its managementInt Surg J20174722817

9 

SD Bhamre ND Pingale A Clinical Study of Incisional HerniaMVP J Med Sci20163116

10 

MA Carlson CT Frantzides VK Shostrom LE Laguna Minimally invasive ventral herniorrhaphy: an analysis of 6266 published casesHernia200812192210.1007/s10029-007-0286-4

11 

A Prasad Saikrishna A Jehna Clinical study of Incisional HerniaAm Med Sci Clin Res201644102374110.18535/jmscr/v4i4.44

12 

MF Inamdar AR Singh NM Inamdar Incisional hernia: risk factors, clinical presentations, and pre-peritoneal polypropylene mesh repairInt Surg J20174411899410.18203/2349-2902.isj20170896

13 

A Subramanian ML Clapp SC Hicks SS Awad MK Liang Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: primary versus secondary herniasJ Surg Res201318111510.1016/j.jss.2012.06.028

14 

F Huda A Kumar Incisional hernia: preliminary observations at a new instituteInt Surg J2017482762510.18203/2349-2902.isj20173414

15 

E Gianetta F De Cain S Cuneo D Friedman B Vitale G Marinari Hernia repair in elderly patientsBr J Surg1997847983510.1002/bjs.1800840721

16 

AG Unnikrishnan S Kalra RK Sahay G Bantwal Mw John N Tewari Prevalence of hypothyroidism in adults: An epidemiological study in eight cities of IndiaIndian J Endocrinol Metab20131746475210.4103/2230-8210.113755

17 

T C Goel P C Dubey Abdominal incisional hernia:Anatomical technique of repairIndian J Surg1981433247

18 

SJ Qadri M Khan SN Wani SS Nazir A Rather Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair using polypropylene mesh - A comparative single centre studyInt J Surg20108647983

19 

RLH Nho D Mege M Ouaïssi I Sielezneff B Sastre Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional herniaJ Visc Surg20121495 Supple31410.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.05.004

20 

DG Umeshchandra Clinical Profile and Management of Incisional Hernia with Special Reference to Use of Polypropylene Mesh:A Case SeriesSch J App Med Sci201531B804

21 

SM Bose L Roshan M Kalra JD Wig SK Khanna Ventral hernia - A Review of 175 casesInd J Surg19996131804

22 

J D Fischer F W Turner Abdominal hernias: A ten year reviewCan J Surg1974172024

23 

RG Molloy KT Moran RP Waldron MP Brady WO Kirwan Massive incisional hernia: abdominal wall replacement with marlex meshBr J Surg19917822424

24 

C D George H Ellis The results of incisional hernia repair. A twelve year reviewAnn R Coll Surg Engl19866841857

25 

IM Rutkow Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in United States in 2003Surg Clin North Am200383510455110.1016/S0039-6109(03)00132-4

26 

TJ White MC Santos JS Thompson Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral herniasAm Surg199864327680

27 

SR Paudel BR Neupane NV Gurung A Acharya A Chapagain S Shrestha Analysis of Risk Factors for Incisional Hernias and its ManagementJ Gandaki Med Coll-Nepal2018102162010.3126/jgmcn.v10i2.20803

28 

AA Musca Umbilical and ventral herniorrhaphy: a review of 1000 cases. I. Characteristics which predict surgical results and predisposing factorsInt Surg196748216979

29 

AP Bedi T Bhatti A Amin J Zuberi Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repairJ Minimal Access Surg200733839010.4103/0972-9941.37190

30 

K Itatsu Y Yokoyama G Sugawara H Kubota Y Tojima Y Kurumiya Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after abdominal surgeryBr J Surg20141011114394710.1002/bjs.9600

31 

BW Murray DJ Cipher T Pham T Anthony The impact of surgical site infection on the development of incisional hernia and small bowel obstruction in colorectal surgeryAm J Surg2011202555860



jats-html.xsl

© 2022 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)