Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 256

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 1138


Ambekar: Perspective study of disorders of thought, language and communication in schizophrenic patients of Maharashtra


Introduction

Ever since the concept of thought disorder was given pre-eminence in Bleuler’s conceptualisation in schizophrenia (in 1950)1 and kraephn’s has reviewed that language and communication are also associated with schizophrenia (1919). It was observed that the traditional concept of thought disorder was also observed in Mania (or Manic) patients hence symptoms scale was useful to diagnose the schizophrenia. Moreover poverty of speech was prominent character in schizophrenia.2

It was suggested that thought disorder that is characterised by intellectual impoverishment was characteristic of schizophrenic.

Since original development of thought, language communication was observed in schizophrenia but the clinical experience contradicts both assumptions language behaviour such as associative loosening, clanging, blocking etc occur in mania, depression and even in normal people when they are fatigued or stressed. 3 Furthermore, some patient’s with schizophrenia speak and think normally with only delusion or hallucination as schizophrenic manifestation occasionally. 4 Hence attempt was made to confirm and evaluate the thought, language communication disorder in schizophrenic.

Materials and Methods

1000 (One Thousand) patient aged between 18 to 50 years regularly visiting to Manas hospital Jalna-431203 Maharashtra were studied.

Inclusive criteria

Patients diagnosed as schizophrenic as per ICD 10 having episodes. Acute schizophrenia was newly diagnosed and chronic schizophrenia was > 2 years were selected for study.

Exclusion criteria

Epileptic, organic mental disorder, patients with physical illness, mentally retarded, substance abuse, were excluded from study.

Method

Every patient was counselled by team of psychiatrist of Manas hospital and ruled out socio-demographic details, disease related characteristics, ICD 10 for diagnosing, Mini mental status scale, scale for assessment of thought, language and communication (TLC) was evaluated thoroughly and compared in acute and chronic schizophrenic illness.

Duration of study was from March-2021 to September-2021 (six months)

Statistical analysis

Various parameters of schizophrenic compared in acute and chronic schizophrenia with z test. The statistical analysis was carried out in SPSS software. The ratio of male and female was 2:1.

Observation and Results

Table 1 Comparison of Formal thought disorder (FTD) in acute and chronic schizophrenic patients. In Negative FTD score Mean value of Acute schizophrenic was 3.01 (SD±2.10) and in chronic schizophrenic 4.12 (SD±1.80) and t test was 8.97 and p value was highly significant (p<0.001).

In comparison of positive Negative disorder (FTD) mean value acute schizophrenic was 6.12 (SD±5.25) in chronic 3.43 (SD±4.32) and t test was 8.84 and p value was highly significant (p<0.001)

Table 2 Comparative study of FTD scores in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenic patients. In Negative FTD test mean value of paranoid was 1.92 (SD±2.33) and in non-paranoid 4.52 (SD±2.20) t test was 16.8 and p value was highly significant. In positive Negative FTD study Mean value of paranoid was 7.90 (SD±5.33) and 3.90 (SD±4.30) in non-paranoid, t test was 9.75 and p value was highly significant (p<0.00).

Table 3 Comparison of disorder of thought, language and communication score in acute and chronic schizophrenic patients. In language disorder study mean value acute schizophrenic in language disorder was 2.2 (SD±1.90) and 3.14 (SD±1.80) in chronic schizophrenic, t test was 8.03 and p value was highly significant.

Table 4 Comparison of disorders of thought, language and communicating scores in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenic. (a) In disorder of thought scores mean value of paranoid was 2.2 (SD±1.80) and 2.50 (SD±2.60) in non-paranoids t test was -2.12 and p value was highly significant (b) In disorder of language 1.80 (SD±1.40) in paranoids, 9.02 (SD±6.20) in non-paranoid t test was 28.2 and p value was highly significant (p<0.001).

Table 1

Comparison of FTD score in acute and chronic schizophrenic patients.

FTD Score

Acute Schizophrenic (500) Mean Value with SD

Chronic schizophrenic (500) Mean value with SD

t test

p value

Positive FTD score

9.22(SD±3.45)

8.18(SD±3.32)

4.85

P>0.19

Negative FTD score

3.01(SD±2.10)

4.12(SD±1.80)

8.97

P<0.003 *

Loose Association score

846(SD±4.08)

7.39(SD±3.38)

4.51

p>0.5

Positive Negative FTD

6.12(SD±5.25)

3.43(SD±4.32)

8.84

P<0.00 *

[i] FTD = Formal thought disorder

[ii] Negative FTD score was highly significant p value (p<0.001)

[iii] * = Significant value

Table 2

Comparison of FTD score in paranoid and Non-paranoid schizophrenia.

FTD score

Paranoid (330) Mean Value with SD

Non-paranoid (670) Mean Value with SD

t test

p value

Positive FTD score

9.13(SD±4.40)

8.43(SD±3.36)

2.54

p>0.99

Negative FTD score

1.92(SD±2.33)

4.52(SD±2.20)

16.8

P<0.00 *

Loose Association score

8.02(SD±4.15)

8.10(SD±3.38)

0.30

p>0.38

Positive Negative FTD

7.19(SD±5.33)

3.90(SD±4.30)

9.75

P<0.001 *

[i] Positive and Negative FTD scores and Negative FTD were highly significant

[ii] * = Significant value

Table 3

Comparison of disorders of thought, disorders of language and communication scores in acute and chronic schizophrenic patients.

Disorders scores

Acute schizophrenic (500) Mean Value with SD

Chronic Schizophrenic (500) Mean value with SD

t test

p value

Thought disorder

2.54(SD±2.69)

2.10(SD±1.82)

3.02

p>0.5

Language disorder

2.2(SD±1.90)

3.14(SD±1.80)

8.03

p<0.00 *

Communication Disorder

9.40(SD±6.45)

9.11(SD±6.12)

0.72

p>0.4

[i] Disorder of language had significant p value

[ii] * = Significant value

Table 4

Comparison of disorders of thought, language and communication scores in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenic patients.

FTD score

Paranoid (330) Mean Value with SD

Non-paranoid (670) Mean Value with SD

t test

p value

Disorder of thought scores

2.2(SD±1.80)

2.50(SD±2.60)

-2.12

p<0.01

Disorder of language

1.80(SD±1.40)

9.02(SD±6.30)

28.2

p<0.00 *

Disorder of communication

9.74(SD±6.60)

9.02(SD±6.30)

1.64

p>0.9

[i] Disorder of language and thought score and has significant p value (p<0.01)

[ii] * = Significant value

Discussion

Present study of disorder of thought, language and communication in schizophrenic patients in Maharashtra. In the comparison of FTD scores in chronic and acute schizophrenia Negative FTD score mean value in acute schizophrenic was 3.01 (SD±2.10) and in chronic 4.12 (SD±1.80) t test was 8.97 and p value was highly significant (p<0.003) and positive negative FTD score. Mean value in acute schizophrenic was 6.12 (SD±5.25) in acute and 3.43 (SD±4.32) in chronic schizophrenic t test was 8.84 and p value was highly significant (p<0.00) (Table 1). In comparative study FTD scores in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenic, Negative FTD score in paranoid score mean value was 1.92 (SD±2.33) in paranoid and 4.52 (SD±2.20) in non-paranoid t test was 16.8 and p value was highly significant positive negative FTD score mean value 7.19(SD±5.33) in paranoid and 3.90 (SD±4.30) in non-paranoid t test was 9.75 and p value was highly significant (p<0.001) (Table 2).

In comparison of thought disorders of language and communication scores in acute and chronic schizophrenia language disorder score mean value 2.2 (SD±1.90) in acute and 3.14 (SD±1.80) in chronic schizophrenia t test 8.03 and p value was highly significant (p<0.001) (Table 3). Comparison of disorders of thought language and communication scores in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenics. Disorders of thought scores mean value 2.2 (SD±1.80) in paranoid and 2.50 (SD±2.6) in non-paranoid t test was -2.12 and p value was highly significant (p<0.01). Disorders language on mean value 1.80 (SD±1.90) in paranoid and 9.02 (SD±6.30) in non-paranoid t test 28.2 and p value was highly significant (p<0.00) (Table 4). These findings are more or less in agreement with previous studies. 5, 6, 7

It is known fact that, commonest language behaviours is pressure of speech, tangentiality, derailment loss of goal. Preservation poverty of content of speech is characteristics of schizophrenic. 8 Moreover in paranoid group has poverty of speech, preservation and self reference illogicality, clanging, neologising word, approximation echolalia are commonly observed. In non-paranoid group tangentiality, derailment loss of goal and preservation changing neologism were observed. 9

In the comparison of paranoid and non-paranoids gross disorganisation was observed in non-paranoid while tangentiality is common disorder in chronic paranoids, possibly reflection of evasive mode of communication word approximation, clanging, and illogical circumstantialities were significant characters in paranoids. 10

Thought, language and communication (TLC) disorders were severe in acute schizophrenia while poverty of speech is extreme in chronic schizophrenia. Positive negative FTD score were more in paranoid schizophrenics includes problems with planning and is reflective of frontal lobe pathology. Moreover the bilateral parietal and temporal lobes gyrus are involved in information processing. 11

Conclusion

Present study of thought language and communication disorders in schizophrenic patients there is significant difference between acute and chronic schizophrenia. In schizophrenia have different diagnostic characteristics in acute and chronic schizophrenia, paranoid and non-paranoid as well. But this demands genetics, embryological, dermatoglyphics, chromatographic, neurological studies because exact patho-psychogenesis of schizophrenia is still un-clear.

Ethical Approval

This research paper was approved by Ethical committee of Indian Institute of Medical Sciences and research warudi, Badnapur, Jalna (district) – Maharashtra

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

NC Andreasen Thought, language, and communication disorders. I. Clinical assessment, definition of terms, and evaluation of their reliabilityArch Gen Psychiatry1979361213152110.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780120045006

2 

H Barenboim TF Ottomans Formal thought disorder in schizophrenics and their twinsJ Abnorm Psychol198594131610.1037//0021-843x.94.1.3

3 

E Bleuler Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias International Universities PressNew York, USA19502159

4 

NC Andresen Scale for the assessment of thought, language, and communication (TLC)Schizophr Bull19861234738210.1093/schbul/12.3.473

5 

PD Harry EA Earle-Boyer MS Wielgus The consistency of thought disorder in mania and schizophrenia. An assessment of acute psychoticsJ Nerv Ment Dis198417284586310.1097/00005053-198408000-00003

6 

DM Simpson GC Davis Measuring thought disorder with clinical rating scales in schizophrenics and non- schizophrenicsPsychiatry Res1985154313810.1016/0165-1781(85)90068-x

7 

AM Shimkunas MD Gynther K Smith Schizophrenic responses to the Proverbs Test: abstract, concrete, or autistic?J Abnorm Psychol19677221283310.1037/h0020087

8 

M Hart RRJ Lewine Rethinking Thought DisorderSchizophr Bull20174335142210.1093/schbul/sbx003

9 

P S Holzman Thought disorder in schizophrenia schizophrBull19861233425910.1093/schbul/12.3.348

10 

EJ Tan SL Rossell Formal thought disorder and neurocognition in schizophrenia: The question of individual mechanismsSchizophr Res20171901899010.1016/j.schres.2017.03.039

11 

K Bhattacharya P Guha M Ghosal SK Sadhukhan Association of thought disorder with cognitive dysfunctions in schizophrenicsGerman J Psychiatry201316413742



jats-html.xsl

© 2023 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)