Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 293

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 1486


Moses, Kuruvilla, and Praveen B K: Clinico-microbiological profile of healthcare associated infections in a neonatal intensive care unit and its relation with environmental surveillance


Introduction

Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI’s), also called nosocomial infections (NI) is defined as a systemic or localized condition that was not incubating at the time of hospital admission, due to adverse reaction to an infectious agent(s) or its toxin(s).1 The symptoms should appear after at least 2 calendar days admission to the hospital for a cause other than the infection in the background.2 The HAI rate indicates the safety of care and quality of a facility, and hence monitoring HAI rates is considered as a key factor required for secure and high-quality healthcare, particularly in intensive care units (ICU’s). 3 The incidence of nosocomial infections is reported to show a large variance with neonatal sepsis from India, ranging from 1.5 to 37%, which is 3 to 20 times greater than in developed countries. 3

HAI’s in neonates are late-onset in nature, or infection after the first 2 calendar days of birth, 1 with exceptions of Group B Streptococcal or Herpes simplex virus infection. 4 The most commonly encountered HAI’s are central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and surgical site infections (SSI’s). 5 The other possible HAI’s include meningitis, conjunctivitis and skin infections. 6

Colonization of the CVC with bacteria and infusate contamination are the main causes of CLABSI, the origin of which may be either extra luminal or intraluminal. 7 VAP is the 2nd most common HAI, and accounts for 6.8% to 32.3% of NICU HAI’s. 8 It’s a major cause of morbidity as well as mortality in critically ill patients who are on invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) through an endotracheal tube (ETT) or via tracheostomy. 9 CAUTI accounts for upto 40% of all HAI’s world wide, probably because urinary catheterisation is required in 15-25% of hospitalised patients. 2 SSI refers to development of an infection at an incision site after a surgical procedure. According to reports, SSI rate in India ranges from 4.1 to 11 per 100 surgeries. 2

Microbial surveillance, improved infection control initiatives and enhanced local skin care have decreased the rate of colonization and diseases caused by Group I organisms like Staphylococcus aureus. 6 Klebsiella species is emerging threat to the sick, frail and debilitated newborns. 10 Approximately 40% of Escherichia coli strains that cause septicemia have K1 capsular antigen. 11

This study aims to evaluate the most common HAI’s, risk factors and microbiological profile of neonatal HAI’s in the NICU and correlate it with the environmental surveillance.

Materials and Methods

This observational, descriptive and prospective study was carried out in the department of Microbiology. 101 samples from neonates in the NICU with signs & symptoms of infection and the environmental surveillance samples from the NICU of the tertiary care centre. The study duration was for one and a half years from December 2018 to May 2020. All neonates admitted to the NICU for a duration more than 2 calendar days, and suspected to have developed a HAI were included in the study. The neonates presenting with signs & symptoms of infection less than 2 calendar days, along with those who were discharged home & later presented with sepsis were excluded from the study.

All basic demographic details of mother and neonate risk factors for an HAI such as, low birth weight, gestational age, gender, mode of delivery, Apgar score at 1 and 5 min less than 7 and co-morbidities if any were noted. Data on invasive device usage (central / umbilical arterial / venous lines, urinary catheters and ventilator), duration of device usage and duration of hospital stay were also collected.

The study group neonates were categorized into site specific HAI’s using Centre for Disease Control and Prevention proposed standard defintions. 12 The required samples (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, endotracheal tube aspirates etc.) were collected under aseptic precautions, processed according to standard methods, and if any organism was present it was further processed and identified using standard microbiological techniques. 13

Blood samples were analyzed using sepsis screen (Absolute neutrophil count, C- reactive protein, Peripheral smear for sepsis) as well as blood culture. According to CDC guidelines, 12 1–2 ml of blood was taken both from the central and peripheral lines, into Bactec bottle and kept for incubation in the Bactec 9120 instrument. CLABSI was diagnosed by calculating the differential time to positivity of the growth obtained. Cerebrospinal spinal fluid (CSF) samples were also examined for cell count and protein & glucose estimation, in addition to Gram’s stain, culture and biochemical tests to identify the bacteria. 1–5 drops of CSF was inoculated onto the culture media and incubated for a period of 24 hrs. Any bacterial growth if present was further identified and subjected for antibiotic sensitivity testing. Supra pubic aspiration or catheterization technique was used for urine sample collection, following which routine microscopic examination, culture & sensitivity were done. In the applicable study subjects, endotracheal tube, ear discharges and conjunctival secretions were also collected for culture and sensitivity.

Data was also collected of the total number of babies on devices and the total number of device days / surgeries, from the NICU. The HAI incidence rates of device / surgery associated HAI’s were calculated for each month during the study period using the formula: 12

VAP / CLABSI / CAUTI rate calculated as = Total number of infections  X 1000Total number of device days

SSI rate calculations = Total number of infections X 100Total number of surgeries performed

Every 4 weeks prior to fumigation, regular environmental surveillance was carried out in the NICU. Environmental surfaces that were regularly screened in the NICU included: phototherapy lights, radiant warmers, baby cot, weighing machine, suction tubings, laryngoscopes, feeding trays, thermometers, feeding counter, air etc. Sterile cotton-tipped swabs were used to sample the surfaces of inanimate articles, by moistening the swabs with sterile phosphate buffered saline and then it was streaked across a 4-in2area. At the same time, culture plates were exposed to room environment of both the NICUs for one hour for air sampling using an air sampler. Water samples were collected from ventilator humidifiers for water culture and processed. The swabs were inoculated on nutrient agar and were incubated at 37°C under aerobic condition for 18-24 hours. The NICU staff were advised to get the surface disinfection & fumigation done as per protocol, in case of a significant growth from any environmental sample. Inorder to ensure decontamination, subsequent sampling was done from the contaminated article after proper disinfection measures. If the increase in the isolation percentage during a specified period was matching with the monthly growth of that organism in the surveillance, it was presumed to have some association. The sample size ‘n’ was calculated according to a study by F. Abdel Wahab in Egypt, where the prevalence of HAI’s in the NICU was 21.4%. 13 n = (Z_(∝^2 ) " p (1-p) " )/e^2 = 101, at e = 8%

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS program for Windows, version 25.0. The data was presented as frequency percentages. Chi square test was used to calculate the p value and analyse the association between different variables & neonatal sepsis, as well as that with environmental surveillance.

Results

The general characteristics of the study group were analysed (Table 1). Samples cultered include blood, ET tip, urine, Wound swab, CVC tip and CSF (Table 2). Majority of the organisms isolated (53.4%) were Gram Negative bacteria, the most common, i.e 19 (18.8%) being Acinetobacter baumannii. Among the 44 (43.5%) Gram Positive organisms isolated, the most common, i.e 14 (13.9%) were Methicillin Resistant Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus. Remaining 3 (2.9%) were Candida albicans (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3). The most common HAI was VAP (41.6%) (Figure 4). The incidence rates of HAI’s in each month was as shown in Figure 5 and statistically significant risk factors for these HAI’s are shown in Table 3.

Environmental surveillance

The percentage of isolation of the predominant pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii in the NICU culture reports were noted each month for the study period, and its average was calculated (Table 4). The average isolation rate of Acinetobacter baumannii in the NICU was 18.8%. The month of January 2019 had an isolation rate of 21.05%, which exceeded average isolation rate. February 2019 had an isolation rates of 26.3% but the surveillance report showed no growth. In the months of June and August 2019, surveillance report showed growth but isolation rates were below average isolation rates, i.e 5.2% and 0% respectively. However, the sensitivity of isolates of environmental samples did not match with that of the clinical isolates, indicating they are of different strains. Some vague association is shown between HAI and environmental surveillance report, but its significance is yet to be known.

Table 1

General characteristics of the study group

Characteristic

Percentage (No.)

Gender:

Male

74.3 (75)

Female

25.7 (26)

Place of birth:

Inborn

72.3 (73)

Outborn

27.7 (28)

Gestational age:

Term

43.6 (44)

Preterm

56.4 (57)

Apgar score at 1 minute:

Unknown

22.8 (23)

0 to 3

2 (2)

4 to 6

18.8 (19)

7 to 10

56.4 (57)

Apgar score at 5 minutes:

Unknown

22.8 (23)

0 to 3

0 (0)

4 to 6

4 (4)

7 to 10

73.3 (74)

Mode of delivery:

Vaginal

34.7 (35)

LSCS

65.3 (66)

History of feed aspiration:

Yes

9.9 (10)

No

90.9 (91)

Superficial infection:

Yes

13.9 (14)

No

86.1 (87)

Comorbidities:

Yes

79.2 (80)

No

20.8 (21)

IV fluids:

Yes

95(96)

No

5 (5)

Breast feeding

Yes

30.7 (31)

No

69.3 (70)

Invasive device

66.3 (67)

Surgery

7.9 (8)

Table 2

Sample cultured

Sample

Percentage (No.)

Blood

60.4 (61)

ET tip

11.9 (12)

Urine

5.9 (6)

Wound swab

9.9 (10)

CVC tip

7.9 (8)

CSF

1 (1)

Table 3

Statistically significant risk factors

VAP

CLABSI

CAUTI

SSI

Preterm birth LSCS Absence of breast feeding Apgar score

Presence of comorbidities Apgar score

None

Preterm birth LSCS Low birth weight

Table 4

Environmental surveillance report from the NICU

Month

Growth

December 2018

No growth

January 2019

Ventilator – CONS Floor – CONS Infusion pump – CONS Suction tubing – Acinetobacter baumanni Oxygen humidifier – Acinetobacter baumanni

February 2019

No growth

March 2019

No growth

April 2019

Ventilator – MRCONS Infusion pump – Staphylococcus aureus Stethoscope – CONS

May 2019

Ventilator – CONS

June 2019

Suction pump – Acinetobacter baumanni

July 2019

No growth

August 2019

Suction pump – Acinetobacter baumanni

September 2019

No growth

October 2019

No growth

November 2019

Oxygen humidifier – CONS

December 2019

Ventilator – MRCONS

January 2020

No growth

February 2020

Stethoscope – CONS

March 2020

Infusion pump – Staphylococcus aureus

April 2020

No growth

May 2020

No growth

Figure 1

Organism isolated

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6acd581a-ddc2-4103-b14d-f33770aa9263image1.png
Figure 2

Gram Negative bacteria isolated

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6acd581a-ddc2-4103-b14d-f33770aa9263image2.png
Figure 3

Gram Positive bacteria and Fungus isolated

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6acd581a-ddc2-4103-b14d-f33770aa9263image3.png
Figure 4

Percentage of HAI's

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6acd581a-ddc2-4103-b14d-f33770aa9263image4.png
Figure 5

Incidence rates of HAI’s

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6acd581a-ddc2-4103-b14d-f33770aa9263image5.png
Figure 6

Environmental samples cultured on nutrient agar and bloodagar

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6acd581a-ddc2-4103-b14d-f33770aa9263image6.png

Discussion

HAI’s continues to pose serious threat to neonates, and many advances have been made in neonatal care that have resulted in an increased chances of survival of smaller and weaker babies. 6 These infections are associated with complications like increased mortality rates, immediate and long term morbidity, prolonged hospital stay and increased cost of care. 14, 15 Hand hygiene, use of maternal breast milk and strict adherence to aseptic protocols in neonatal NICU’s are of utmost importance inorder to keep the infection rates low. 16

The most common HAI among neonates found in our study was VAP (41.6%), followed by CLABSI. This was in concordance with the study by F. Abdel Wahab et al. 17 However, in a study by Kumar S et al, 1 CLABSI (73%) was the most common HAI, followed by VAP (12%).

Overall, the statistically significant risk factors for HAI in our study were found to be preterm birth, LSCS, presence of other co-morbidities, low birth weight, absence of breast feeding and an Apgar score at 5’ less than 7. This was similar to studies by Kumar S et al. 1 However, Jeong et al 18 and Prado DS et al 19 demonstrated that there was no association between HAI’s and above mentioned factors.

Gram negative bacteria were predominant (53.4%) in our study, the most common organism being Acinetobacter baumannii, followed by Klebsiella pneumonia, F. Abdel Wahab et al 17 found that Klebsiella spp. were the most frequently isolated organisms followed by E. coli, Citrobacter koseri, Pseudomonas putida, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Ralstonia pickettii and Alkaligens fecalis similar to the results of previous Egyptian studies. 20, 21 The identification of gram positive organisms in cultures from patients can be difficult due to the differentiation between colonization and infection, for example, CoNS are typically found on the newborns skin. 22 Bacillus spp was isolated from 4% babies with VAP, along with Enterococci, Micrococcus spp and Streptococcus mitis, 85.1% of the babies with HAI recovered with appropriate treatment and were discharged home. Antibiotics were started on the basis of resistance patterns of the organisms isolated and antibiotic susceptibility reports done by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method and CLSI guidelines. 23 Other supportive care including IV fluids, caffeine, vitamin K, total parenteral nutrition, breast milk or paladai feeds, and symptomatic therapy was also given to the neonates. NICU surfaces harbour microbial ecosystems, influenced by contact with their residents, i.e innately vulnerable premature and sick neonates. 24

In our study, the above average isolation rate of Acinetobacter baumanni was matching with the monthly growth of a similar organism according to the surveillance report. In the study by Kumar S et al 1 S. aureus was the dominant pathogen isolated from neonates as well as the environment. This correlation between organisms from the HAI and environmental surveillance may not show cause-effect relationship. Though environmental cultures may be one of the predicting causative factors that contribute to late onset sepsis, its statistical significance is yet to be proven. Molecular typing, along with studies on survival period of organisms on different inanimate articles and restricting collection of blood samples for culture to that period may be helpful in confirming the association between HAI and environmental surveillance. We still lack knowledge regarding answers to such queries which require more elaborate studies.

In order to prevent nosocomial infections, NICU’s must strictly follow infection control bundles and routine bedside cleaning and disinfection of nursery equipment, and there are studies that demonstrate a reduction in bacterial colonization after routine cleaning practices.25 Based on our study results, NICU staff was advised to conduct surface disinfection & fumigation using 5% Silvicide (10% Hydrogen peroxide + 0.01% Silver nitrate) 20% Silvicide respectively, following which subsequent sampling was done from the contaminated articles to ensure decontamination. However, the effect of routine cleaning on colonization by commensal and pathogenic bacteria in infants is still unclear.

Suction pump and oxygen humidifier were the main environmental sources of infection in our study. Humidified incubators, being beneficial for maintaining the skin integrity and temperature regulation of neonates, are a mainstay equipment in treating preterm infants in NICU’s. But the microbes can also grow in warm moist environment, especially Staphylococci. 25 Even after all this, the frequency with which incubators are to be cleaned inorder to minimize the risk of infections, while maintaining infant safety is unknown.

Conclusion

Hospital acquired infection (HAI) in neonates is one of the most common complications posing serious health hazard as it leads to increased morbidity, mortality, duration and costs associated with hospital stay. The most common HAI among neonates was Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, followed by Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection. Gram negative organisms were responsible for majority of the infections, among which Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most common. The significant risk factors associated with HAI were found to be preterm birth, lower segment caesarean section, presence of other co-morbidities, low birth weight, absence of breast feeding and an Apgar score at 5’ less than 7.

On environmental surveillance, Acinetobacter baumanni was found to have an isolation rate above average, indicating its possible role in causing HAI in neonates admitted to the NICU. But this study shows only a vague association of HAI with the environmental surveillance report and its significance is yet to be known. This shows a need for multicentric neonatal nosocomial infection surveillance systems with standardised definitions and reporting formats, inorder to generate information on neonatal HAI rates and predisposing factors in our setting, using which appropriate preventive strategies can be taken up.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

S Kumar B Shankar S Arya M Deb H Chellani Healthcare associated infections in neonatal intensive care unit and its correlation with environmental surveillanceJ Infect Public Health2018112275910.1016/j.jiph.2017.08.005

2 

A Sastry R Deepashree Essentials of Hospital Infection ControlJaypee Brothers Medical PublishersKundli, Sonipat, Haryana20191569

3 

MAH Gadallah AMA Fotouh IS Habil SS Imam G Wasef Surveillance of health care associated infections in a tertiary hospital neonatal intensive care unit in Egypt: 1 - year follow - upAm J Infect Control2014421112071110.1016/j.ajic.2014.07.020

4 

J Ramasethu Prevention and treatment of neonatal nosocomial infectionsMatern Health Neonatol Perinatol201731510.1186/s40748-017-0043-3

5 

T G Emori National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS): description of surveillance methodsAm J Infect Control201819147

6 

A Sastry S Bhat Essentials of Medical MicrobiologyJaypee Brothers Medical PublishersKundli, Sonipat, Haryana20166067

7 

G Mittal R Gaind P K Verma M Deb Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in an intensive care unit from a tertiary care teaching hospital in IndiaInt J Infect Control2016121610.3396/IJIC.v12i1.002.16

8 

R Polin S Denson M Brady Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Health Care-Associated Infections in the NICUJ Pediatr2012129411049

9 

F Miller Ventilator Associated PneumoniaAnaesthesia Tutorial of the Week2018https://resources.wfsahq.org/wp-content/uploads/382_english.pdf

10 

C A Gleason S E Juul Avery’s Disease of the Newborn10Elsevier publishersWashington2018490512

11 

Sai Global Classification Of Air Cleanliness For Cleanrooms2002https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-us/standards/jis-b-9920-2002-630704_SAIG_JSA_JSA_1447005/

12 

CDC Guidelines for environmental infection controlin health care facilities2003https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/environmental/background/sampling.html

13 

M Cheesebrough Medical laboratory manual for tropical countries. 2ndedCambridge university pressNew York2005124129

14 

NS Boghossian GP Page EF Bell BJ Stoll JC Murray CM Cotten Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight infants from singleton and multiple-gestation birthsJ Pediatr201316261120410.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.089

15 

E Nagata A S Brito T Matsuo Nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: incidence and risk factorsAm J Infect Control2002302631

16 

E W Tiemersma Methicillin resistant Staphylococccus aureus in EuropeCDC Emerg Infect Dis199910916271663

17 

AF Wahab M Ghoneim M Khashaba AH Elgilany HD Abdel Nosocomial infection surveillance in an Egyptian neonatal intensive care unitJ Hosp Infect2013833196910.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.017

18 

IS Jeong JS Jeong EO Choi Nosocomial infection in newborn intensive care unit,South KoreaBMC Infect Dis20066103 10.1186/1471-2334-6-103

19 

D Prado R Mendes R Gurgel I Barreto R Cipolotti R Gurgel The influence of mode of delivery on neonatal and maternal short and long term outcomesRev Saude Publica2018529510.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000742

20 

BS Ascher PB Smith RH Clark M Cohen-Wolkowiez JS Li K Watt Sepsis in young infants with Congenital Heart DiseaseEarly Hum Dev201288Suppl 2S92710.1016/S0378-3782(12)70025-7

21 

VG Hemming JC Overall MR Birtt Nosocomial infections in a Newborn Intensive Care Unit. Results of forty-one months of surveillanceN Engl J Med1976294241310610.1056/NEJM197606102942403

22 

AS Kumar M A Wassey A cross sectional study on effect of initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of birth on early onset neonatal sepsisInt J Contemp Med Res20163618657

23 

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute / NCCLS Performance standards for Antimicrobial disc diffusion tests; Approved standards. 30th ed. CLSI Document M100Clinical and Laboratory Standards InstituteWayne Pa2020

24 

N Bokulich D Mills M Underwood Surface Microbes in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Changes with Routine Cleaning and over TimeJ Clin Microbiol2013518261724

25 

MC Goffau Cold spots in neonatal incubators are hot spots for microbial contaminationAppl Environ Microbiol20117724856872



jats-html.xsl

© 2023 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)