Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 171

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 1065


Pothala, Sangeeta M, Varalakshmi KL, and Afroze M: Patellar dimensions in south Indian population-An aid to implant design in total knee arthroplasty


Introduction

Patella is the largest sesamoid bone develops in the tendon of the quadriceps femoris. Patella is triangular in shape with apex directed downwards. It is flat bone tapering distally with anterior and posterior surfaces. Patella has base, medial border and lateral border. The anterior surface is rough and non articular with longitudinal ridges covered by an expansion from the quadriceps femoris. The upper part of posterior surface is articular with larger lateral facet and smaller medial facet which are separated by median ridge. The lower non articular part on the posterior surface is rough for the attachment of ligamentum patella. The most medial part of patella articulates with the medial condyles of femur during full flexion at the knee joint. 1

Patellar dimensions have an evolutionary and forensic importance. Patellar morphometry is affected by environment, culture and ethnicity. It is also of utmost importance in developing patellofemoral implants for total knee arthroplasty. A disproportionate implant will result in limitation of movement in knee joint and unstable patellofemoral knee complex. 2 This study aimed at analysing of morphometry of patella and classifying patella according to Wieberg’s classification in South Indian population as variation in shape of patella can result in unstable patella. 3 A thorough knowledge of the morphometry of patella and its biomechanics will aid in understanding the pathologies associated with knee. 4

Materials and Methods

101 dry patella of both sexes were taken for the study from the Department of Anatomy MVJMC & RH, Bangalore. Bones with fractures, loss of bone density or bone erosion were excluded from the study. Measurements of patella namely patella height, width, thickness, width of medial articular facet and lateral articular facet were studied using digital Vernier calipers as follows.

Figure 1

Patella Thickness measurement

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/32eb59ca-e8d0-4fab-80cc-97acb17ff579/image/e865b9db-7963-4190-a028-93e8f3b2d07a-u4.png

Figure 2

Patella Bone

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/32eb59ca-e8d0-4fab-80cc-97acb17ff579/image/697b3329-5a0b-4ed1-80e6-fe6c75d194a2-u4.png

  1. Patella height / length – distance between superior border and apex.

  2. Patella width – distance between medial and lateral border

  3. Patella thickness – distance between anterior surface and median ridge on posterior surface

  4. Width of medial articular facet – maximum width from medial border to the median ridge.

  5. Width of lateral articular facet – maximum width from lateral border to the median ridge.

  6. The measurement of variables was tabulated and statistically analyzed.

The mean, maximum, minimum and standard deviation of all the variables was calculated and tabulated. Pearsons correlation coefficient was used to study the association between height, width and thickness, Mean width to thickness ratio was graphed. Satistical analysis was performed with Microsoft excel.

Results

Table 1

Patella Bone Measurements (COMBINED) right and left side

Variable

Mean ± SD

Max

MIN

P-value

Length

39.07723 ± 4.454456

62

29.6

0.267308

Width

42.56733 ± 3.079127

51.1

35.5

0.698506

Thickness

22.7099 ± 2.796516

28.9

16

0.801724

MAF(Width)

19.86139 ± 2.828532

29

14

0.584311

LAF(Width)

24.64356 ± 1.88989

30

21

0.428569

Table 2

Patella Boneright side measurements

Variable

Mean ± SD

Max

Min

Length

39.50741± 3.51073

47

31.4

Width

42.68148± 3.282491

51.1

36.6

Thickness

22.70926± 2.758607

27.3

16

MAF (Width)

19.96296± 2.719343

29

15

LAF (Width)

24.48148± 1.997553

30

21

Table 3

Patellabone left side measurements

Variable

Mean ± SD

Max

Min

Length

38.5087± 5.369826

62

29.6

Width

42.43913± 2.891941

48

35.5

Thickness

22.85652± 3.088736

29.9

17

MAF(Width)

19.65217± 2.938007

29

14

LAF(Width)

24.78261± 1.750086

30

21

Figure 3

Pie chart for different types of patella based on wiberg classification

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b9625730-b2df-4842-a92c-7e1e0b07567aimage1.png
Table 4

Correlation between patellar width and thickness

Patellar bone width

Patellar bone thickness

Correlation (r value)

P value

Combined

0.286

0.004

Right

0.342

0.011

Left

0.281

0.049

Figure 4

Correlation between width and thickness of patella (combined)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b9625730-b2df-4842-a92c-7e1e0b07567aimage2.png
Figure 5

Correlation between width and thickness of patella (Right)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b9625730-b2df-4842-a92c-7e1e0b07567aimage3.png
Figure 6

Correlation between width and thickness of patella (Left)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b9625730-b2df-4842-a92c-7e1e0b07567aimage4.png

The results of various statistical parameters (Length, Width, Thickness, MAF and LAF) on the right & left side and combined were expressed in terms of mean and standard deviations along with minimum and maximum values.(Table 1) The mean height, width and thickness of patella was 39.07mm, 42.56mm and 22.7mm. The values of all the variables of both sides were compared. There was no statistical difference between the variables on right and left sides. Width of MAF in the present study was 19.8 ±2.82 mm while Width of LAF was 24.6±1.88mm. Ratio of width to thickness of patella was 1.8mm. There was positive correlation between the width and thickness of patella on both right, left sides and combined.(Table 4)

Table 5

Study

Study Sample

Patella Height(mm)

Patella Width(mm)

Patella Thickness(mm)

Mean

Standard deviation

Mean

Standard deviation

Mean

Standard deviation

Schlenzka and Schwesinger(2014)

50 fresh human cadaveric patella

54.4

3.5

50.3

4

-

-

Iranpour.et.al (2008)

30 Reconstructed CT scans

44.3

4.8

44.8

4.8

22.4

2.3

Shang peng (2014)

CT Scan

39.94

3.68

-

-

22.72

1.81

Poonam Vohra et.al(2017)

60 Dry bones

41.55

2.84

40.17

2.59

19.29

1.52

Present study

Dry bones

39.07

4.45

42.56

3.07

22.70

2.79

Magi Murugan et al

65 adult dry patella

38.07

3.70

-

-

18.29

Baldwin &House

92 patella during total knee arthroplasty

-

-

-

-

22.6

1.73

Patella was classified according to Wiberg classification on the basis of dimensions of the width of medial articular and lateral articular facet as well as curvature of the facets. Each patella was classified into three categories as Type-1 where WMAF=WLAF, Type-2 where WMAF>WALF and type-3 in which WMAF<WLAF. Out of 101 patella studied, 78 patella belonged to Type-2,17 patella were type-1 and 06 patella were classified as Type-3.

Discussion

Patellar morphometry has significant role in implant design and surgical procedures like patella resurfacing for total knee arthroplasty.5 In the present study the measurement of bone was done on dry bones to avoid errors during measurement. The mean height, width and thickness of patella in this study were 39.07mm, 42.56mm and 22.70 mm respectively. The data obtained was compared with the previous studies and summarized in Table 3.

In the present study mean height of the patella was 39.07mm with standard deviation of 4.45 which was similar to the findings of Shang peng, Magi Murugan, Vohra et al but less compared to the previous study by Schlenzka and Schwesinger.6, 7, 8, 9 Table 1 also shows that, the values of patellar height are comparable with previous studies irrespective of the methodology (CT, Dry bones/MRI). However, the width of patella in our study was also less compared to study by Schlenzka and schwesinger9 but almost similar to the study by Poonam Vohra et al and Iranpour et al.8, 5 These variations could be because of racial differences, differences in methodology, sex etc.

Thickness of patella in our study also coincided with the findings of Iranpour et al, Shang peng, Baldwin & House. 5, 6, 10 There was no significant difference between right and left side of patellar dimensions which was similar to that of the studies by previous authors. Width to thickness ratio on right side was 1.88mm and for the left side was 1.85mm. This was similar to the findings by Iranpour et al who studied the patellar dimensions through CT scan.5 Their study revealed a positive correlation coefficient between width and thickness of patella similar to what we observed in this study.

Patella were also classified based on the dimensions of the articular facets. In our study, type B was most prevalent which support Wieberg et.al and Koyunchu et.al observations. 11, 12

Width of MAF in the present study was 19.8 ±2.82 mm which was similar to the studies done on other population. However, study by Biswas and Sharma reported lower values on eastern population of India.13 Width of LAF was 24.6±1.88mm comparable to studies in other population except Biswas & Sharma reporting slightly lower values. 13 Ratio of width to thickness of patella was 1.8mm similar to that of Chinese population (1.94mm) average but less than the UK population (2.11mm average). This ratio is useful to create patellar prosthesis during knee arthroplasty.5 The ratio of LAF to MAF was 1.24mm similar to studies by Shang Peng (1.34mm) and Magi Murugan (1.21mm).6, 7

No significant differences in variable values were observed between the right and left side similar to previous studies However, study by Olateju reported greater width and thickness of patella on the right in Europeans which he postulated was because of over use of one limb. 14

We observed Type B patella as the most common variant based on Wibergs classification similar to Magi Murugan and Fucentese et.al. 15

Koyuncu et al in his study on foetal patella reported that prevelance of Class-A patella(width of MAF is equal to LAF) as 20%, Class B patella (width of MAF less than LAF) as 50% and Class C patella(width of MAF more than LAF)as 30% which is different from Wibergs classification of adult patella. 11, 12

Conclusion

In order to aim for optimum biomechanical integrity following Total Knee arthroplasty, ideal size of the implant is imperative. Patellar size is one of the criteria used for patellar resurfacing. It is desirable to resect not more than one third of patellar thickness to prevent loss of bony structure. This study may add value to the existing data on Morphometry of patella in Indian population. Patellar morphometry can be used in sex determination with an accuracy of 80%. This study may also add values to existing literature on patellar morphometry which can be put to use in science of anthropology, forensic, anatomy and on designing prosthesis for reconstruction surgeries.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

S Standring Gray’s AnatomyPelvic Girdle and Lower Limb. 40th edn.Churchill LivingstoneNew York2008132949

2 

E Koyuncu N Cankara O Sulak G Ozguner S Albay The morphometry of patella and patellar ligament during the fetal periodClin Anat20112422253110.1002/ca.21075

3 

M Akhlaghi A Sheikhazadi A Naghsh G Dorvashi Identification of sex in Iranian population using patella dimensionsJ Forensic Leg Med2010173150510.1016/j.jflm.2009.11.005

4 

AJ S Fox F Wanivenhaus SA Rodeo The basic science of the patella: structure, composition, and functionJ Knee Surg20112521274110.1055/s-0032-1313741

5 

F Iranpour AM Merican JP Cobb AA Amis The width:thickness ratio of the patella: An aid in knee arthroplastyClin Orthop Relat Res20084665119820310.1007/s11999-008-0130-x

6 

S Peng L Zhang Z Hou X Bai X Ye Z Xu Morphometric measurement of the patella on 3D model reconstructed from CT scan images for the southern Chinese populationChin Med J2014127196101

7 

M Murugan S Ambika VK Nim Knee CAP: A morphometric studyInt J Anat Res20175135569

8 

P Vohra Morphometric study of patella and its role in sex determinationInt J Anat Physiol Biochem20174369

9 

D Schlenzka G Schwesinger The height of the patella: an anatomical studyEur J Radiol19901111921

10 

JL Baldwin CK House Anatomic dimensions of the patella measured during total knee arthroplastyJ Arthroplasty2005202250710.1016/j.arth.2004.09.027

11 

G Wiberg Roentgenographic and anatomic studies on the femoropatellar jointActa Orthop Scand194112319410

12 

Esra Koyuncu Osman Sulak Gulnur Özgüner Soner Albay The morphometry of patella and patellar ligament during the fetal periodClinical AnatomyClinical Anatomy242225256

13 

S Biswas S Sharma Morphometric study of patellar measurement: an overview from eastern zone of IndiaInt J Contemp Med Res20196359

14 

OI OlatejuI I PhilanderI MA BidmosI Mubarak A Bidmos Morphometric analysis of the patella and patellar ligament of South Africans of European ancestryS Afr J Sci2013109910

15 

SF Fucentese A Von Roll PP Koch DR Epari B Fuchs PB Schottle The Patellar morphology in trochlear dysplasia: A comparitive MRI studyKnee20061321455010.1016/j.knee.2005.12.005



jats-html.xsl

© 2023 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)