Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 245

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 884


Padhi, Panigrahi, Dash, and Das: Cutaneous adverse effects of chemotherapy in cancer patients: A clinico epidemiological study


Introduction

There has been an ever-rising trend in incidence of various types of cancers over the last decade. With chemotherapy being the major modality of treatment, cutaneous and systemic side effects have been a concern for not only the patients, but also the treating clinicians.

Cancer is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in both developed and developing parts of the world with the disease burden projected to grow exponentially in the future. International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is the specialized cancer agency of World Health Organization (WHO), reported 14.1 million new cancer cases and 8.2 million cancer-related deaths in 2012. Indian data reported 1.14 million new cases and 0.7 million cancer-related deaths in 2012.1

Chemotherapy is the administration of powerful cytotoxic drugs to destroy cancer cells. It usually works by keeping the cancer cells from growing, dividing, and making more cells. Because cancer cells usually grow and divide faster than normal cells, chemotherapy has more of an effect on cancer cells. However, the drugs used for chemotherapy are powerful, and they can still cause damage to healthy cells. This damage causes the side effects that are linked with chemotherapy.

Because chemotherapy target not only the cancer cells, but also the other rapidly proliferating cells, skin and skin appendages like hair and nails are most commonly affected. Adverse reactions can range from minor skin changes such as paronychia, Acneiform eruption, and alopecia to life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as SJS and TEN.

These drug eruptions are usually immunologically mediated reactions that are termed type B adverse reaction. Most drug eruptions appear to result from T-cell mediated delayed hypersensitivity. The secondary activation of different cascades of cytokines, may contribute to the heterogeneity of clinical presentation. 2

Materials and Methods

120 patients of clinically diagnosed cancer who underwent chemotherapy were included in this Observational study after due approval institutional ethical clearance and patient consent.

Exclusion criteria

  1. De novo cutaneous presentations of internal malignancies

  2. Patients undergoing radiotherapy

  3. Pre-existing dermatoses

Photographic images of skin, hair and nails were taken before and after every cycle of chemotherapy were collected. Cutaneous adverse effect were graded as per criteria for adverse effects version 4.0 of National Cancer Institute.3

Data were analysed using SPSS version 16.0

Results

Out of 120 patients, 72 females and 48 males were found to have adverse effects with (72%) belonging to age group of 50 to 70 years.

Figure 1

Gender distribution

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/9e7a97e6-5cb2-4fca-9fec-12980ee2af70image1.png
Table 1

Agedistribution

Age in years

Number of patients

40 – 50

8

50 – 60

38

60 – 70

49

70 – 80

25

Common indications for chemotherapy include carcinoma breast (34%), oropharynx (22%) and stomach (12%). 2

The most commonly used chemotherapy drugs were Alkylating agents (Cyclophosphamide, Busulfan), Antimetabolites (5FU, Capecitabine, Gemcitabine), Antitumor Antibiotics (Dactinomycin, Bleomycin, Doxorubicin, Daunorubicin) and others (Etoposide, Irinotecan, Paclitaxel, etc.)

Figure 2

Gender distribution of cancer

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/9e7a97e6-5cb2-4fca-9fec-12980ee2af70image2.png
Table 2

S.No.

Cutaneous adverse effects

Drugs incriminated

1.

Anagen effluvium

Alkylating agents, Antimetabolites, Taxanes

2.

Xerosis

Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, cisplatin 5-FU

3.

Prurigo nodularis

Paclitaxel, carboplatin

4.

Hand foot syndrome

Capecitabine , 5-FU

5.

Flagellate dermatosis

Bleomycin

6.

Acneiform eruption

EGFR ihibitors, ABL Tk inhibitors

7.

Melanonychia/nail changes

Taxanes, Cyclophosphamide, Capecitabine,

8.

Diffuse pigmentation/ dyspigmentation

Busulfan, Methotrexate, Procarbazine, Capecitabine

Chemotherapeutic agents with narrow therapeutic index are toxic to rapidly proliferating cells of skin, hair nails at therapeutic doses resulting in multifarious side effects. 4, 5

Anagen effluvium - most common presentation found in 66 cases, skin changes in 45 cases, nail changes in 12 cases. Alopecia is psychologically distressing with 58 % rated alopecia secondary to chemotherapy as the most traumatic side effects and 8% discontinued chemotherapy because of fear of hair loss.5, 6, 7 The cessation of mitotic activity in the hair matrix results in a narrow weakened portion of the hair shaft known as Pohl-Pinkus constriction which is prone to fracture.8

Xerosis (46%) and Hyperpigmentation (22%) were commonly observed. Xerosis occurred due to abnormal keratinocyte differentiation which leads to an impaired sebaceous gland function and loss of ability to retain water.9

Hyperpigmentation is due to post inflammatory hyperpigmentation, stimulation of melanin synthesis by the increased action of adrenocorticotrophic hormone, or due to hypersensitivity reactions.10

Acneiform eruption was seen in 8 cases. Hand and foot syndrome was seen in 5 cases. Melanonychia was seen in 3 cases. Prurigo nodularis was seen in 4% cases and flagellate pigmentation in 3 cases.

Single case of Bullous photodermatitis was reported.

Figure 3
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/9e7a97e6-5cb2-4fca-9fec-12980ee2af70image3.png

Discussion

The major cutaneous adverse effects observed in our study are described as below.

Acneiform eruptions or papulopustular rash occur mainly on the seborrheic areas such as the face, scalp and chest associated with Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.11 These drug alters signaling pathways causing in keratinocyte growth arrest, apoptosis, decreased cell migration and increased differentiation and elicits an inflammatory response mediated by various cytokines.12 7 patients on these drugs had an itchy papulo-pustular rash in this study. Such Acneiform eruption was seen in 9% cases by Ashok et al13 10% cases by Pavey et al 12 and 11% cases by Biswal et al.14

Hair changes were the most commonly noted followed by skin, nail, and mucosal changes in our study. Table 2 summarizes the comparison of different cutaneous findings reported by Biswal et al.,14 Kirthi et al.,15 Pavey et al.,12 Chiewchanvit et al.,16 and in our study, Anagen effluvium was seen in 76% cases as compared to 37 % by Pavey et al,78% in Biswal et al and 70.3 % by Fabbrocinni et al.17

Xerosis found in 46% cases. Majority (53.9%) noticed skin lesions by 4–6th week of therapy. Pavey et al. reported a similar incidence of xerosis (22%) but the onset of lesions was earlier at 2-4 weeks. Xerosis was seen in 26% by Ashok et al.

Hyperpigmentation was the next most common adverse reaction observed in 22 (22%) patients in this study. The sites most commonly involved were dorsum of hands, feet, and periungual region. Diffuse hyperpigmentation seen in 3% patients. Pavey et al. and Chiewchanvit et al. observed a frequency of 22.2% and 31.3% of hyperpigmentation in their respective studies.12, 16 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide are the drugs found to cause hyperpigmentation in this study.

Melanonychia or pigmentation of nail matrix was seen in 12.5 % cases in our study. Such changes were seen in 29% cases by Fabbrocini et al, 49%cases by Pavey et al and 15% cases by Ashok et al.

Hand foot dermatitis was seen in 2.2% cases as compared to 2.6% cases by Biswal et al and 1.5% cases by Ashok et al.

Flagellate pigmentation was seen in 2 patients as compared to 1.5% cases by Ashok et al 1.2% cases by Pavey et al and 0.3% cases by Biswal et al.

Table 3

Comparative studies on various adverse effects

Cutaneous finding

Fabbrocini et al

Biswal et al

Pave et al

Ashok et al

Present study

Anagen effluvium

70.3%

78.6%

37%

68%

76%

Xerosis

38%

4.4%

22.2%

26%

46%

Dyspigmentation

22.2%

22%

14%

Hand Foot Syndrome

2.6%

0.1%

1.5%

2.2%

Prurigo nodularis

3%

5%

4%

6%

4%

Flagellate dermatosis

1.5%

0.3%

1.2

1.5

0.08

Acneiform eruotion

8.5%

11%

10%

9%

7.5%

Melanonychia/Nail changes

29.4%

2.9%

49%

15%

12.5%

Bullous photo dermatitis

0.3%

0.6%

0.4%

0.08%

Conclusion

Since all cancer chemotherapy agents are not target based, adverse effects of skin and appendages become inevitable.

Adverse reaction occur in varying degrees of frequency and severity within each class of chemotherapeutic drugs resulting in significant physical and psychological morbidity.

Counselling of patients and attendants play a major part as many adverse reactions are reversible with end of chemotherapy.

Thus, early detection of such adverse effects can help them managed effectively and thereby reducing the morbidity and increasing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Need of the hour is conglomeration of expert Dermatology care along with chemotherapy in order to assuage the psychosocial trauma out of cutaneous reactions of chemotherapy.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

LA Torre F Bray RL Siegel J Ferlay J Lortet-Tieulent A Jemal Global cancer statisticsCA Cancer J Clin20126528710810.3322/caac.21262

2 

J Roujeau Immune mechanisms in drug allergyAllergol Int2006551273310.2332/allergolint.55.27

3 

A P Chen A Setser MJ Anadkat J Cotliar EA Olsen BC Garden Grading dermatologic adverse events of cancer treatments: The common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0J Am Acad Dermatol201267510253910.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.010

4 

WS Susser DL Whitaker-Worth JM Grant-Kels Mucocutaneous reactions to chemotherapyJ Am Acad Dermatol19994033679810.1016/s0190-9622(99)70488-3

5 

A Hasnat S Poddar R Sultana R Sultana M Akbor M Azad Pattern of Adverse Drug Reactions Due to Cancer Chemotherapy in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in BangladeshDhaka Univ J Pharm Sci20108111610.3329/dujps.v8i1.5330

6 

EL Mcgarvey LD Baum RC Pinkerton LM Rogers Psychological sequelae and alopecia among women with cancerCancer Pract200196283910.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.96007.x

7 

SJ Yun SJ Kim Hair loss pattern due to chemotherapy-induced anagen effluvium: A cross-sectional observationDermatology20072151364010.1159/000102031

8 

G Hinds VD Thomas Malignancy and cancer treatment-related hair and nail changesDermatol Clin2008261596810.1016/j.det.2007.08.003

9 

ME Lacouture SA Boerner PM Lorusso Non-rash skin toxicities associated with novel targeted therapiesClin Lung Cancer20068Suppl 13642

10 

B Guillot D Bessis O Dereure Mucocutaneous side effects of antineoplastic chemotherapyExpert Opin Drug Saf2004365798710.1517/14740338.3.6.579

11 

AM Hussein Chemotherapy-induced alopecia: New developmentsSouth Med J19938654899610.1097/00007611-199305000-00001

12 

R A Pavey S M Kambil RM Bhat Dermatological adverse reactions to cancer chemotherapyIndian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol201581443410.4103/0378-6323.159950

13 

A Menon S Handattu J Shetty GB Shanmukha Study of cutaneous adverse effects of cancer chemotherapyClin Dermatol Rev201821192410.4103/CDR.CDR_20_17

14 

SG Biswal RD Mehta Cutaneous adverse reactions of chemotherapy in cancer patients: A clinicoepidemiological studyIndian J Dermatol20186314610.4103/ijd.IJD_65_17

15 

C Kirthi A Afzal M Reddy S Aamir Ali A Yerramilli S Sharma A study on the adverse effects of anticancer drugs in an oncology center of a tertiary care hospitalInt J Pharm Pharm Sci 201465803

16 

S Chiewchanvit K Noppakun K Kanchanarattanakorn Mucocutaneous complications of chemotherapy in 74 patients from Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospitalJ Med Assoc Thai200487550814

17 

G Fabbrocini N Cameli M C Romano M Mariano L Panariello D Bianca Chemotherapy and skin reactionsJ Exp Clin Cancer Res2012315010.1186/1756-9966-31-50



jats-html.xsl

© 2023 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)