Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 140

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 1576


Mogali, Prashanth Kumar B, Hudge, and Tukaram: Surgical profile of patients with of benign breast disease at a tertiary care centre: A hospital based retrospective study


Introduction

Benign breast disease constitutes the most common cause of morbidity due to breast lesions compared to the malignant one. But they remain neglected.1, 2 They constitute a variety of disorders including clinical varieties as well as the pathological varieties. They are non-malignant in nature.3 Their clinical features also vary a lot. The benign breast disease also constitutes a majority of the breast lesions overall.4 Among females of any part of the world, the benign breast disease is the most common disease. It has been estimated that more than one third of women suffer from benign breast disease in their lifetime. The disease compels them to go to the hospital.5, 6 The breast disease is characterized by a variety of symptoms right from simple pain in the breasts to the pre-cancerous lesions to completely developed cancer of the breast. Thus, it is a physiological process that undergoes development and the involution. Of all the breast diseases, benign breast lesions are very common in females. It has been estimated that they are ten times more common than that of the malignancies of the breast.7, 8 Benign breast disease is more common in the age group of 20 to 40 years. It is most commonly due to the hormonal changes taking place. It is rare after menopause as the ovarian stimulation stops.9

Benign Breast Diseases, though more frequently responsible for bringing the patient to the doctor, have not found many places in good recent researches. Benign lesions of the breast have assumed increasing importance in recent years because of the public awareness of breast cancer. These benign lumps are a recognized important risk factor for later breast cancer. Also, whether the burden of benign breast diseases transforms into numbers in terms of hospitalization and surgeries in India is not studied much.

Hence, to understand the pattern of breast diseases requiring surgical intervention, we undertook this retrospective analysis of all breast surgeries for benign done at our institute over the past five years.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at ESIC medical college and Hospital Gulbarga, India. Study conducted after approval of Scientific committee and Ethical committee. Records of all patients undergoing breast surgery from the period March 2016 to March 2021 were analysed, and age, sex, laterality, diagnosis and surgery performed were noted.

Duration of study

This retrospective study performed between March 2016 to March 2021

Inclusion criteria

All patients who underwent surgery for benign breast disease were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients diagnosed or suspected with Carcinoma of breast are excluded from the study

Steps of each procedure.

  1. Excision Biopsy: Circumareolar incision of adequate length over areola, it is also called curvilinear incision. Subcutaneous fat dissected and subcutaneous tunnel created to reach lump. Lump is excised, good hemostasis maintained, one or two absorbable multifilament sutures for subcutaneous fat and skin closed with absorbable monofilament suture in subcuticular fashion. This technique was used in most patients. In some patients where lump was far away from the areola, the linear skin incision over lump, or inframammary incisions were used as per Operative notes in the records. This technique used for Gynecomastia, Fibroadenoma, Breast cyst, Fibrocystic disease, Antibioma and Lipoma. For sebaceous cyst excision was done using elliptical incision over the cyst.

  2. Incision and Drainage: An adequate sized linear incision over the abscess to reach the abscess cavity and pus drained, all loculations divided, cavity washed with povidone-iodine 5% solution followed by normal saline, wound packed with gauze soaked in povidone-iodine 5% solution.

  3. Simple mastectomy: A horizontal elliptical incision (Stewart or modified Stewart incision was used) including nipple-areolar complex was used in all three patients due large size of tumour. Skin flaps elevated superiorly (almost up to clavicle), inferiorly (up to costal margin), medially (up to sternal edge) and laterally (up to the edge of pectoralis major muscle) to dissect complete breast. A sub fascial dissection is performed lifting the breast off the pectoralis major muscle up to axillary tail of breast. Good hemostasis ensured and washed with saline, suction tube drain placed through inferior flap, wound edges sutured with non-absorbable monofilament suture.

  4. Microdochectomy: Surgeon identified the offending duct by expressing it which discharges, then an incision mark is made on areolar border, a fine lacrimal probe was gently inserted into discharging duct. An adequate sized Circumareolar incision was made, nipple skin flap raised and the duct containing probe identified and excised with a margin of surrounding tissue from dermis to deeper breast tissue (about 4cm). Good hemostasis ensured wound washed with saline. Breast tissue approximated using absorbable suture and skin closed using absorbable monofilament suture in subcuticular fashion.

The data was entered in the Microsoft excel sheet and analysed using proportions.

Results

Table 1

Distribution as per various types of benign breast disease

Type of benign breast disease

Number

%

Fibroadenoma

362

58.4

Breast abscess

131

21.1

Breast cyst

45

7.3

Fibrocystic disease

31

5

Lipoma of the breast

16

2.6

Antibioma

12

1.9

Sebaceous cyst

10

1.6

Gynecomastia

8

1.3

Benign phylloids tumor

3

0.5

Duct ectasia

2

0.3

Total

620

100

The most common type of benign breast disease was fibroadenoma in 58.4% of the cases followed by breast abscess in 21.1% of the cases. The duct ectasia was the least common type seen in two cases only (Table 1)

Table 2

Age wise distribution of the different types of benign breast disease

Age (years)

Fibroadenoma

Abscess

Cyst

Fibrocystic disease

Others

Total

11-20

88 (24.3%)

4 (3.1

11 (24.4%)

8 (25.8%)

3 (5.9%)

114 (18.4%)

21-30

202 (55.8%)

105 (80.2%)

28 (62.2%)

21 (67.7%)

18 (35.3%)

374 (60.3%)

31-40

48 (13.3%)

18 (13.7%)

4 (8.9%)

2 (6.5%)

10 (19.6%)

82 (13.2%)

41-50

20 (5.5%)

3 (2.3%)

2 (4.4%)

0

14 (27.5%)

39 (6.3%)

> 50

4 (1.1%)

1 (0.8%)

0

0

6 (11.8%)

11 (1.8%)

Total

362 (58.4%)

131 (21.1%)

45 (7.3%)

31 (5%)

51 (8.3%)

620 (100%)

Table 3

Laterality wise distribution of the different types of benign breast disease

Type of benign breast disease

Right side

Left side

Bilateral

Total

Fibroadenoma

206 (58.1%)

107 (51.2%)

49 (87.5%)

362 (58.4%)

Breast abscess

73 (20.6%)

56 (26.8%)

2 (3.6%)

131 (21.1%)

Breast cyst

29 (8.2%)

16 (7.7%)

0

45 (7.3%)

Fibrocystic disease

18 (5.1%)

10 (4.8%)

3 (5.4%)

31 (5%)

Lipoma of the breast

7 (1.9%)

9 (4.3%)

0

16 (2.6%)

Antibioma

8 (2.3%)

4 (1.9%)

0

12 (1.9%)

Sebaceous cyst

6 (1.7%)

4 (1.9%)

0

10 (1.6%)

Gynecomastia

5 (1.4%)

2 (0.9%)

1 (1.8%)

8 (1.3%)

Benign phylloids tumor

1 (0.3%)

1 (0.5%)

1 (1.8%)

3 (0.5%)

Duct ectasia

2 (0.6%)

0

0

2 (0.3%)

Total

355 (57.3%)

209 (33.7%)

56 (9%)

620 (100%)

Table 4

Sex wise distribution of benign breast disease

Sex

Number

%

Male

8

1.3

Female

612

98.7

Total

620

100

Table 5

Distribution of study subjects as per the type of surgery performed

Type of benign breast disease

Type of surgery performed

Number (%)

Type of incision

Circumareolar

Linear

Fibroadenoma

Excision

362 (58.4%)

356 (61.7%)

6 (13.9%)

Breast cyst

Excision

45 (7.3%)

32 (5.5%)

13 (30.2%)

Fibrocystic disease

Excision

31 (5%)

25 (4.3%)

6 (13.9%)

Lipoma of the breast

Excision

16 (2.6%)

3 (0.5%)

13 (30.2%)

Antibioma

Excision

12 (1.9%)

7 (1.2%)

5 (11.6%)

Gynecomastia

Excision

8 (1.3%)

8 (1.4%)

0

Duct ectasia

Microdochtecomy

2 (0.3%)

2 (0.3%)

0

Total

476

433 (93.3%)

43 (6.9%)

The most common age group affected was 21-30 years seen in 60.3% of the cases with the benign breast disease. Elderly of age more than 50 years were least affected with the benign breast disease. Similar trend was seen for all types of benign breast disease ($)

Right side was most commonly affected in 57.3% of the cases. Only 9% had bilateral disease. Similar trend was seen for other types except lipoma of the breast which was more common on left side (Table 3)

Benign breast disease as expected is more common in females (98.7%) compared to males who had only eight cases. (Table 4)

Most common type of surgery performed was excision in all cases except for duct ectasia in which case microdochtecomy was performed. Circumareolar type of incision was most commonly used in all cases (Table 5)

Discussion

The most common type of benign breast disease was fibroadenoma in 58.4% of the cases followed by breast abscess in 21.1% of the cases. The duct ectasia was the least common type seen in two cases only. The most common age group affected was 21-30 years seen in 60.3% of the cases with the benign breast disease. Elderly of age more than 50 years were least affected with the benign breast disease. Similar trend was seen for all types of benign breast disease. Right side was most commonly affected in 57.3% of the cases. Only 9% had bilateral disease. Similar trend was seen for other types except lipoma of the breast which was more common on left side. Benign breast disease as expected is more common in females (98.7%) compared to males who had only eight cases. Most common type of surgery performed was excision in all cases except for duct ectasia in which case microdochtecomy was performed. Circumareolar type of incision was most commonly used in all cases.

Kaur N et al10 carried out a prospective study. They included 262 cases with benign breast disease. The incidence of benign breast disease was 17%. The most common condition was fibroadenoma in 77 cases. We also found that the most common condition was fibroadenoma. 98 cases in their study had mastalgia with nodularity. Nipple discharge was reported in 13 cases. They found that 18 cases had giant or multiple fibroadenomas; 13 cases had mastalgia and nodularity; 7 cases had sub areolar abscess; four cases had mastitis. 82 cases had non proliferative disease; 19 cases had proliferative disease without atypia, three cases had proliferative disease with atypical and 11 were miscellaneous cases.

Ortiz BM et al11 studied younger women of age less than 40 years. They were assessed by three independent observers for the diagnosis of the disease. They carried out 698 ultrasound examinations. Out of these, 52% reports were normal. Among those who had abnormal reports, 38% were found to have fibroadenomas. In the present study also we found that the fibroadenomas were the most common entity of the benign breast disease. They found that 27% had cyst, benign nodule was seen in 24% of the reported cases.

Sangma MBM et al12 included 100 women with benign breast disease over a period of one year in their study. They used combination of clinical examination, fine needle aspiration cytology method, biopsy with core needle and mammography or ultrasonography for the diagnosis of the benign breast disease. They compared the clinical diagnosis with that of the diagnosis made from histopathology reports to study the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination. In their study, 48% were found to have fibroadenomas. In the present study also we found that the fibroadenomas were the most common entity of the benign breast disease. 18% of the cases were found to have fibrocystic changes in their study. 12% of the cases were found to have breast abscess in their study. These findings are found to be comparable with the present study findings. Three cases were found to have proliferative disease with atypia. One case was found to have florid hyperplasia. One elderly lady turned out to be having invasive carcinoma after she was suspected to have benign breast disease on clinical examination. All cases were treated as per the standard guidelines based on the final confirmatory diagnosis.

Stachs A et al13 wrote a review on benign breast disease after exhaustive review of literature from all available articles and presented their findings. They observed that about half of women aged about 30 years had mastalgia and fibrocystic changes. In their study, 25% were found to have fibroadenomas. In the present study also we found that the fibroadenomas were the most common entity of the benign breast disease. The authors emphasized the importance of the difference between benign and malignant disease to avoid risk to the health of the women. They also observed that there is a 23% to 31% risk of malignancy in cystic breast diseases. There is a 16% risk of malignancy in papillary breast diseases. In case of the radial scars, the risk of being turned in the malignancy is about 7%. Hence, it is important that histopathology should be performed in all cases of suspected malignancies.

Richter-Ehrenstein C et al14 studied 376 cases having B3 lesions. 42.8% of these were found to have atypical ductal hyperplasia. 26.1% of the cases were found to have flat epithelial atypia. 13.3% of the women were found to have lobular neoplasia. 10.6% of the cases were found to have papillary findings. 7.2% of the cases were found to have radial scar complex. But majority i.e. 74% of the cases were found to have benign breast disease. Remaining of the cases were malignant in nature.

Dillon MG et al15 identified 211 patients with B3 lesion and they had 51 patients of B4 lesions included in their study. In 86% of the cases, the open biopsy was performed. 21% of the cases were found to have B3 lesions. 6% of the cases were found to have radial scars. 14% of the cases were found to have papilloma. 44% of the cases were found to have lobular neoplasia.

Conclusion

Fibroadenoma was most common type of benign breast disease affecting 21-30 years of age commonly and right side. Excision remains the most commonly performed surgery for benign breast disease. Most of benign breast lumps surgery was done using circumareolar incision.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest in this article.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

A Srivatsava A Dhar Benign Breast Disease: A neglected entityRecent Adv Surg200610175201

2 

MG Abhijit D Anantharaman B Sumanth R Ranjani Benign breast diseases: experience at a teaching hospital in rural IndiaInt J Res Med Sci201312738110.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20130507

3 

N Rangabashyam D Gyanprakashan B Krishnaraj V Manohar S R Vijayalakshmi Spectrum of benign breast lesionJ R Coll Surg Edinb198328636973

4 

T Fatima F Azhar Q Butt Pattern of benign breast diseases in females presenting at public hospitalJRMC20111521234

5 

S Selvakumaran MB Sangma Study of various benign breast diseasesInt Surg J2017413394310.18203/2349-2902.isj20164466

6 

M Guray AA Sahin Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and managementOncologist20061154354910.1634/theoncologist.11-5-435

7 

N Kumar K Monika Benign Breast Diseases in Tertiary Centre in North Bihar: A Clinico-pathological StudyInt J Sci Stud201642569

8 

DS Raghuwanshi S Khan Q Ali KK Parmar A Krishnanand Surgical burden of breast diseases at a teaching hospital in Central India- a retrospective analysisInt J Surg Med2020653842

9 

TB Patil AA Manekar Epidemiology of benign breast disease in rural population of North MaharashtraInt J Surg Sci201822158

10 

N Kaur N Agarwal P Panwar K Mishra Clinicopathologic profile of benign breast conditions in Indian women: prospective study based on aberrations of normal development and involution classificationWorld J Surg201236922528

11 

B M Ortiz D B Hernandez C R Mateos Fjr Garcia Benign breast diseases: clinical, radiological and pathological correlationGinecol Obstet Mex2002706138

12 

Mbm Sangma K Panda S Dasiah A Clinico-Pathological Study on Benign Breast DiseasesJ Clin Diagn Res201373503610.7860/JCDR/2013/5355.2807

13 

A Stachs J Stubert T Reimer S Hartmann Benign breast disease in womenDtsch Arztebl Int201911633-3456574 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0565

14 

C Richter-Ehrenstein K Maak S Roger T Ehrenstein Lesions of "uncertain malignant potential" in the breast (B3) identified with mammography screeningBMC Cancer201818182910.1186/s12885-018-4742-6

15 

MG Dillon EW Mcdermott AD Hill A O'Doherty N O’ Higgins CM Quinn Predictive value of breast lesions of "uncertain malignant potential" and "suspicious for malignancy" determined by needle core biopsyAnn Surg Oncol200714270411



jats-html.xsl

© 2023 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)