Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 145

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 1814


Choubey, Agrawal, and Jain: Outcome analysis of fracture lower end radius (Ao Type B & C) treated by ORIF and plate


Introduction

Treatment of distal radius fractures is difficult due to comminution and joint involvement.1 These fractures are unstable & difficult to reduce. They are accompanied by complications which include reduced grip strength, limited motion, carpal stability, malunion, distal radioulnar joint subluxation/dislocation and late disruption of fracture. Multiple procedures like reduction and cast appliation, external fixator application, k wire fixation leads to a poor functional outcome.2 The resulting deformity of the wrist causes pain, movement limitation and wrist joint arthritis.3 Restoration of normal alignment and articular surface, with a stable fixation and/or bone grafting can be difficult, but it is needed for a good functional outcome. The fracture reduction directly correlates to the outcome.4 The plate reconstruction offers fracture reduction directly as well as a stable fixation. Another important benefits are early post-operative mobilization and rehabilitation.5 With the use of Lock Compression Plate(LCP), small bone piece can be held together.6, 7 Thus, this study aims to evaluate the role of the volar plate fixation as the treatment method of choice for distal radius fractures and compare it with other results.8, 9

Materials and Methods

35 cases of fracture distal end radius operated by open reduction and internal fixation by volar locking plates from December 2012 to March 2017 in our institution were reviewed who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 7 patients were lost in follow-up. Hence records of a total of 28 cases were available for this study.

Inclusion criteria

Adults(age>18yrs and < 60yrs), AO type B&C, Displaced intra articular fracture distal radius with 1) volar or dorsal angulation of >100,2)radial inclination <150, 3) intraarticular step off >2mm, 4)>5 mm of shortening by ulnar variance on the posteroanterior radiographic view, fractures < 3 weeks old.

Exclusion criteria

Unfit for anesthesia, skeletal immaturity, pathological fractures, compound fractures, polytrauma, known alcohol or drug dependency, inability to participate in the study, neuromuscular disorder & Inflammatory arthritis. Patients participating in other clinical trials of a drug or device were also excluded. The mean age of 20 male patients and 8 female patients was 36.86 years (Range from 18-56 years). The most common mechanism of injury was a fall on outstretched hand. Nineteen patients had their dominant limb fractured. Fracture radius was classified by the AO Classification system as follows: Type B1 in 3 cases, B2 in 2 cases, B3 in 11 cases, C1in 6 cases, C2 in 3 cases and C3 in 3 cases. Most cases were surgically treated within first week of the injury. (range 0-14 days).

Surgical procedure

After taking written informed consent of inclusive criteria patient to OT. Patient were taken up for open reduction and fixation with Anatomically contoured Volar locking plate. Of the 35 patients, 15 underwent Surgical fixation under general anesthesia while remaining 20 underwent brachial plexus block. The procedure was done in supine position. A Pneumatic tourniquet was used in all cases. Using the standard Volar (Henry’s) approach, intermuscular plane was developed between brachioradialis & FPL. Radial and distal borders of the pronator quadratus muscle were elevated and retracted. Fracture site was exposed subperiosteally. Fracture fragments were curetted and anatomic reduction achieved with the help of manual distraction, intrafocal leverage, or dis-engaging the fracture. Temporary fixation by Kirschner wires was done. Volar locking plate was fixed and confirmed in C Arm machine. Additional stabilization, if found necessary, was done either with k-wires. After fixation, pronator quadrates muscle was attached to its insertion with absorbable sutures. Postoperatively plaster splint was applied in supination and 100-150 palmar flexion till suture removal. Active and passive finger motion exercises were encouraged post operatively. Post-operatively, Sitting up in the bed was allowed once the brachial block effect was over. 1st check dress was done on day 2 & Post-operative X-Ray was taken. On the 5th postoperative day the patient was discharged after 2nd check dress. Stitch removal was done usually on 11th Post operative day and splint was removed. Patients were started on wrist and finger range of motion exercises. Both active as well as passive movements were encouraged. Prayer stretch for extension of the wrist, passive flexion, Forearm rotation for supination/pronation, Grip strengthening by ball in the hand exercises, Grasping, opposition and pinch exercises, Elbow flexion and extension, Shoulder flexion, abduction and extension exercises were taught by a physiotherapist and encouraged. Weight lifting was prohibited for at least 12 weeks after operation. All patients were followed up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-operatively. At the time of each visit of patients, anteroposterior and lateral view Xrays of both wrists were done. They were assessed for reduction and bony union, volar tilt, radial inclination, radial height, and ulnar variance. Range of motion was evaluated at each visit. Scoring was done by modified Gartland and Werley scoring system.10

Results

Patients were traced for a minimum duration of one year. (range: 12-24 months).

Radiographic parameters assessment revealed average radial height, radial inclination, ulnar variance and palmar tilt, calculated at one to three months was found to be 8±1.mm, 17±4 degrees, −0.1±0.6 mm, and 7± 5 degrees respectively. At the end of 12 month of visit, the average radial height, radial inclination, ulnar variance, and palmar tilt changed to 8±1.2 mm, 17±4 degrees, −0.1±1.9 mm, and 7± 5.1 degrees respectively. No significant difference x-ray parameters were noted at the end of 12month follow-up, indicating no further appreciable collapse of fracture and maintained reduction in due course of time. The flexion at the end of 12month of follow-up was 60± 9 degrees and extension 50±10 degrees. The average supination was 77±11 degrees and pronation 84±5 degrees at 12month of follow-up as shown below. [Figure 1]

Figure 1

Average Movements at wrist gained with time

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/1b4cf660-c3d1-4fcc-81a9-3a40fd94b277image1.png

90% of patients reported pain grading on the visual analog scale one or less than one at 12 weeks and at final follow-up.

In our series; [Figure 2].

At the final follow-up.

  1. Excellent results in 17 cases out of 28 cases in which most of the excellent results in AO type B fractures (excellent outcome in 13patients out of 16patients i.e. 81.25% cases) as compared to type C fracture where it was 33.33% cases (excellent outcome in 4 patients out of 12 patients).

  2. Good results in 6cases out of 28 cases out of which mostly patients were AO type C fractures.

  3. Fair results in 3 cases out of 28 cases.

  4. Poor results in 2 cases out of 28 cases which were in AO type C fractures.

  5. So plating has a better outcome in AO type B fractures, While equivocal results in type C fractures.

Figure 2

Bar diagram showing AO subtype and functional outcome

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/1b4cf660-c3d1-4fcc-81a9-3a40fd94b277image2.png

One patient developed superficial skin infection on the 5th postop day which was resolved around the 10th postoperative day and the rest of the period was uneventful. So overall complication was reported in one patient. None of the case had any nerve palsy, tendon rupture, nonunion or implant failure.

Gartland & Werley's score improved in due course of time at final follow up mean Gartland & Werley score was around 2 which was excellent. [Figure 2]. Poor results can be because of poor reduction of fracture fragments.

Discussion

Stable fixation along with joint surface reduction is the primary goal in the treatment of distal radius fractures. Secondary goal is to prevents secondary arthritis and poor functional outcome.3 Various treatment modalities for distal radius fracture fixation includes close/open reduction and cast application, k-wire fixation, external fixator, plates application.11 Volar plate approach offers spacious distal radius suitable for implant fixation. Also, its application technique is relatively simple and prevents damage to the blood supply which is important for bony union. Locking plates are especially useful in osteoporotic fractures to prevent fracture collapse. The single unit plate and screw locking construct holds and supports the bony fragments. Plating offers direct visualization of fracture fragments helpful in anatomy restoration, early mobilization and hence early and better return of wrist function and hence reduce morbidity.12 Numerous complications are described with plating which includes risk of infection, tendon irritation, tendon rupture requiring implant extraction in few cases. 13 The pronators quadrates muscle act as a barrier to minimize flexor tendon irritation. 14 In our study, pronation improved more rapidly as compared to supination. While both returned to near normal at the end of final visit. No significant collapse of the fracture occurred at the end of 12 months.

Our results compared favorably with existing literature. In 2010 Gerald Gruber et al reported >90% of patients had excellent to good results by Gartland and Werley score after plate fixation of distal radius.15 Similar results are seen in our study too. Another study by David H. Wei. Et al (2009), reported better DASH scores after locking volar plate fixation comparable to our study. 16 Anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation is the primary goal of treatment for intrarticular distal radius fracture. Limitations of our study included relatively shorter follow up, lack of controls and lack of variety of fracture patterns.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that locking compression plate offers a good method of treatment for articular distal radius fractures. Reduction is maintained with lock compression plates in due course of time so that secondary displacement doesn’t occur. Also, early return to functional activity can occur with vigorous physiotherapy. Based on our results, we opine that excellent functional outcome can be obtained in AO-type B fracture with volar locking compression plates. However, role of volar plating in AO-type C fracture is inconclusive and needs further studies to prove its role.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest in this article.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

J Ellis Smith's and Barton's fractures. A method of treatmentJ Bone Joint Surg Br19654747247

2 

A Jose SM Suranigi PN Deniese Unstable Distal Radius Fractures Treated by Volar Locking Anatomical PlatesJ Clin Diagn Res2017111RC04810.7860/JCDR/2017/24114.9261

3 

JR Fowler AM Ilyas Prospective evaluation of distal radius fractures treated with variable-angle volar locking platesJ Hand Surg Am201338112198203

4 

R Arora M Lutz A Hennerbichler D Krappinger D Espen M Gabl Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar locking plateJ Orthop Trauma200721531622

5 

A Bentohami K De Burlet N De Korte MP Van Den Bekerom JC Goslings NWL Schepnw Complications following volar locking plate fixation for distal radial fractures:a systematic reviewJ Hand Surg Eur Vol20143977455410.1177/1753193413511936

6 

M Jakob D A Rikli P Regazzoni Fractures of the distal radius treated by internalfixation and early function. A prospective study of 73 consecutive patientsJBone Joint Surg Br200082334044

7 

M Figl P Weninger M Liska M Hofbauer M Leixnering Volar fixed-angle plateosteosynthesis of unstable distal radius fractures: 12 months resultsArchOrthop Trauma Surg200912956619

8 

M Lafontaine D Hardy P Delince Stability assessment of distal radius fracturesInjury198920420810

9 

T Lindau L Hagberg C Adlercreutz K Jonsson P Aspenberg Distal radioulnar instability is an independent worsening factor in distal radial fracturesClin Orthop Relat Res20003762293510.1097/00003086-200007000-00031

10 

JJ Gartland CW Werley Evaluation of healed Colles’ fracturesJ Bone Joint Surg-Am1951334895907

11 

F Leung Yuan-Kun Tu WYC Chew SP Chow Comparison of external and percutaneous pin fixation with plate fixation for intra-articular distal radial FracturesJ Bone Joint Surg (Am)200890818745

12 

J Wei TB Yang W Luo JB Qin FJ Kong Complications following dorsal versusvolar plate fixation of DRF: a meta-analysisJ Int Med Res201341226575

13 

D Osada SF Viegas MA Shah RP Morris RM Patterson Comparison of differentdistal radius dorsal and volar fracture fixation plates: a biomechanical studyJ Hand Surg Am200328194104

14 

J Sonntag J Hern L Woythal U Branner KH W Lange S Brorson The Pronator Quadratus Muscle After Volar Plating: Ultrasound Evaluation of Anatomical Changes Correlated to Patient-Reported Clinical OutcomeHand (N Y)202116132710.1177/1558944719840737

15 

G Gruber M Zacherl C Giessauf M Glehr F Fuerst W Liebmann Quality of life after volar plate fixation of articular fractures of the distal part of the radiusJ Bone Joint Surg Am20109251170810.2106/JBJS.I.00737

16 

DH Wei NM Raizman CJ Bottino CM Jobin RJ Strauch MP Rosenwasser Unstable distal radial fractures treated with external fixation, a radial column plate, or a volar plate. A prospective randomized trialJ Bone Joint Surg Am200991715687710.2106/JBJS.H.00722



jats-html.xsl

© 2023 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)