Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 128

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 1138


Lineesh, Krishnan C, Gireeshan VK., Sabitha, Suresh Baboo V K, and Menon: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children: A prospective study


Introduction

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was first reported from the United Kingdom in 1961.1 Initially it was considered as a nosocomial pathogen. Later in 1980, community associated MRSA (CA MRSA) infection was reported in the United States. 2 Since then, prevalence has increased worldwide. In an Indian study by Joshi et al, MRSA constituted 42% and 40% of Staphylococcus infections during two consecutive years. 3

The epidemiological characteristics of MRSA infections in children reported from developed countries are bacteraemia, musculoskeletal infections, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), pneumonia, central nervous system infections and endocarditis with a 78% of MRSA infections being community onset. 4 In a study from South India, Kandasamy et al showed that MRSA was responsible for 44% of SSTI, 66% of empyema, 30% of bacteraemia and 13% of septic shock. In the above study, 80% of MRSA infections were community acquired (CA MRSA) whereas another Indian study reported a 54% incidence of CA MRSA. 5, 6

Compared to the hospital associated MRSA (HA MRSA), CA MRSA is reported as more virulent, 7 placing themselves capable of causing highly invasive, rapidly progressive and life-threatening diseases. These factors along with the increasing incidence of CA MRSA infections in children pose a challenge to the clinicians during the selections of empirical antimicrobial agents in suspected invasive infections. So knowledge about the disease load, clinical pattern, risk factors, outcome and antimicrobial susceptibility in a given geo demographic context can contribute crucially to the treatment outcome of MRSA infections in children. There is insufficient data on MRSA infections in children in this part of the country and the present study aims to analyse the profile, clinical pattern, factors affecting the immediate outcome and antimicrobial susceptibility of MRSA infections in children.

Materials and Methods

This prospective observational study was undertaken from January 2016 to December 2017 in the Institute of Maternity and Child Health, Government Medical College Kozhikode, Kerala state, India, which a tertiary hospital is catering for six districts. Institute Ethics Committee clearance was obtained (Reg. No.ECR/395/Inst/KL/2013). (Ref.NO. GMCKKD/RP 2016/IEC/20; dated 28.01.2016). Children aged between two months and 12 years having a documented fever ≥ 38.5⁰C were evaluated for invasive bacterial infections by drawing the sample for blood culture by the standard procedure. They were examined for the symptoms and signs characteristics of systemic infections. Complete blood count, urinalysis, blood urea, creatinine and transaminase estimation were carried out in all the patients. Chest radiography, echocardiography and invasive procedures were performed as indicated. Culture samples from pus, body fluids, urine or bone marrow were collected selectively according to the clinical characteristics. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents. The procedures followed were in accordance with the standards of institutional ethics committee.

The specimens for culture were subjected to bacteriological study as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations in the microbiology department. 8 Staphylococcus aureus was identified using standard microbiological laboratory parameters. MRSA was defined when an isolate demonstrated a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >4 μg of oxacillin per mL. The MIC was determined by broth microdilution method using 0.0125 to 128 µg/ml solution. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for gentamicin, amikacin, cotrimoxazole, linezolid, clindamycin and rifampicin with the disk diffusion method.8 Susceptibility to vancomycin was tested by the agar dilution method according to the CLSI guidelines. 8 A minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤ 2 µg/ml was the cut-off for vancomycin susceptibility. Methicillin resistance was tested using a cefoxitin disk on Mueller-Hinton agar by the modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method in which ≤ 21 mm inhibition zone in 30 µg cefoxitin disc was taken as the cut off for resistance. All the discs used in our study were from HiMedia, Mumbai.

Once diagnosed, MRSA infection was treated with vancomycin for three weeks. If prolonged treatment was warranted, as in the case of empyema or bone and joint infections, parenteral or oral linezolid was used as switch over treatment. Each patient was monitored during their hospitalisation. Demographic, clinical, microbiological and laboratory data were documented in a structured proforma. 9

Cases were defined as HA MRSA, when growth obtained on the Mueller-Hinton agar plate was ≥ 48 hours after hospitalisation or growth obtained < 48 hours of admission with any of the health care associated risk factors like i) a history of hospitalisation, surgery, dialysis, or residence in a long-term healthcare facility within 12 months prior to the culture date, ii) past history of MRSA infection or colonisation or iii) presence of an indwelling intravenous line, catheter, or any other percutaneous medical device at the time the culture was taken. 10 HA MRSA was categorised into hospital onset type (HAHO MRSA) when growth was obtained ≥ 48 hours after hospitalisation, and community onset type (HACO MRSA), when culture was obtained <48 hours after hospitalisation and had a health care associated risk factor. 10 Patients with growth obtained within 48 hours with no health care risk factor were classified as CA MRSA infections. 10 MRSA pneumonia was defined as patients with clinical and radiologic evidence of pneumonia with isolates of MRSA from blood. Empyema was defined as i) MRSA isolated from pleural fluid or ii) MRSA isolated from blood having loculated effusion identified by radiology and/or histologic evidence of empyema during pleural fluid study. MRSA septicaemia was diagnosed when patients were showing features of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and MRSA growth from blood. 11 Peritonitis was defined as a symptomatic child with ascitic fluid study showing >100 leukocytes/mmᶾ with ≥ 50% neutrophils and/or positive culture for MRSA from peritoneal fluid. Anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin level below the range for age and sex and leucocytosis when the white blood cell (WBC) count was >2 standard deviation above the mean for age and thrombocytopenia as a platelet count <1,50,000/cu mm. Prolonged hospital stay was defined as hospitalisation ≥ 14 days.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS (https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software) version 18.0. The chi-square test was used for comparing proportions. Univariate analysis was performed to find out the correlations of variables with PICU admission and mortality; further a multivariate model was set up to study the possible risk factors.

Results

A total of 431 children suspected with invasive bacterial infections were included in the study, out of which 83(19.3%) were diagnosed as MRSA infections. Blood (42, 50.6%), pus (28, 33.7%) and body fluids (13, 15.7%) were the sites of MRSA isolation. The body fluids were constituted by 6 cerebrospinal fluid, 4 joint fluid, 1 pleural and 2 peritoneal fluid samples. Cerebral palsy, nephrotic syndrome, hematologic malignancies, primary immunodeficiency, congenital cyanotic heart diseases and bronchiectasis were the co-morbidities associated. Among the MRSA infections, 44(53%) were CA MRSA and 39(47%) HA MRSA and 21(53.8%) of the HA MRSA infections were hospital onset type (HAHO MRSA) and 18(46.2%) were community onset type (HACO MRSA). The demographic data and clinical presentations of children with MRSA infections are described in Table 1. The clinical profile, haematological parameters and outcome of children with MRSA infection are shown in Table 2 and the antimicrobial susceptibility profile in Table 3. The analysis of risk factors for PICU admission and mortality in children with MRSA infections is given in Table 4.

Table 1

Demographic data and clinical presentations of children with MRSA infection (n = 83)

Variables

Number (%)

Infants

37 (44.6%)

Toddlers

16 (19.3%)

Preschool children

12 (14.5%)

School aged children

18 (21.7%)

Males

48 (57.8%)

Females

35 (42.2%)

Fever ≥38.5⁰ C

83 (100%)

Cough & breathlessness

32 (38.6%)

Lethargy

13 (15.7%)

Altered sensorium

21 (25.4%)

Seizure

3 (3.7%)

Pyoderma/painful swelling

25 (30.2%)

Joint swelling

7 (8.5%)

Loose stools

6 (7.3%)

Persistent vomiting

24 (29.0%)

Table 2

Clinical profile, haematological parameters and outcome of children with MRSA infection

Variables

Total(n=83)

CA MRSA(n=44)

ªHA MRSA(n=39)

**p value

Comorbid conditions†

42(50.7%)

16(38.09%)

26(61.9%)

0.006

Septic shock

15(18.1%)

8(53.33%)

7(46.66%)

0.978

SSTI⁺

25(30.2%)

18(72%)

7(28%)

0.038

Pneumonia

24(29.0%)

14(58.33%)

10(41.66%)

0.692

Empyema

8(9.7%)

2(25%)

6(75%)

0.095

Meningitis

6(7.3%)

2(33.33%)

4(66.66%)

0.316

Peritonitis

2(2.5%)

0(0%)

2(100%)

0.128

Bone and joint infections*

8(9.7%)

3(37.5%)

5(62.5%)

0.355

Septicemia

10(12.1%)

5(50%)

5(50%)

0.839

PICU care

38(45.8%)

18(47.37%)

20(52.63%)

0.344

Ventilator care

17(20.5%)

8(47.06%)

9(52.94%)

0.581

Prolonged hospital stay

48(57.8%)

21(43.75%)

27(56.25%)

0.048

Mortality

9(9.9%)

3(33.33%)

6(66.66%)

0.210

Anaemia

60(72.3%)

31(51.66%)

29(48.33%)

0.692

Neutrophilia

66(79.6%)

34(51.51%)

32(48.48%)

0.590

Thrombocytopenia

16 (19.3%)

6(37.5%)

10(62.5%)

0.166

[i] ⸙Community Associated MRSA ªHospital Associated MRSA ⁺Skin and Soft Tissue Infection *Septic Arthritis & Osteomyelitis ** p value < 0.05 is taken as significant

Table 3

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of MRSA (n = 83)

Antibiotics

Total(n=83)

⸙CA MRSA(n=44)

ªHA MRSA (n=39)

P value

Vancomycin

83(100%)

44(100%)

39(100%)

NA*

Linezolid

83(100%)

44 (100%)

39(100%)

NA*

Gentamicin

26(33.3%)

19(73.07%)

7(26.92%)

0.01

Amikacin

57(68.7%)

31(54.38%)

26(45.61%)

0.71

Co-trimoxazole

61(73.5%)

33(54.09%)

28(45.9%)

0.75

Clindamycin

66(79.5%)

37(56.06%)

29(43.94%)

0.25

Rifampicin

75(90.4%)

37(84.1%)

38(97.5%)

0.04

[i] ⸙Community Associated MRSA, ª Hospital Associated MRSA *NA - Not applicable

Table 4

Factors associated with PICU admissions and mortality in children with MRSA infections (n=83)

Variables

Risk Factors for PICU admission

Number (%)

Odds Ratio

Corrected OR

(95% CI)

p value

⸙CA MRSA(n=44)

18(41)

1.6

0.88

0.31 – 2.53

0.80

ªHA MRSA(n=39)

20(51)

2.2

0.39

0.88 - 5.10

0.30

Comorbidities(n=42)

23(55)

2.2

1.60

0.56 - 4.59

0.40

Anemia(n=60)

33(55)

4.5

3.38

1.02 - 11.18

0.04

Thrombocytopenia(n=16)

14(88)

12.6

8.35

1.55 – 45.03

0.02

Neutrophilia(n=66)

27(41)

0.4

0.43

0.11 – 1.72

0.24

Risk Factors for mortality

⸙CA MRSA(n=44)

3(7)

0.4

0.50

0.08 – 3.23

0.47

ªHA MRSA(n=39)

6(15)

2.5

0.11

0.56 – 10.70

0.11

Comorbidities(n=9)

6(67)

2.2

1.7

0.27 – 9.98

0.61

Thrombocytopenia(n=9)

7(78)

25.3

43.74

3.86 – 495.9

0.02

Anemia (n=9)

7(78)

1.4

0.20

0.02 – 2.54

0.30

Neutrophilia (n=9)

6(67)

0.5

0.59

0.16– 9.63

0.96

[i] ⸙Community Associated MRSA, ªHospital Associated MRSA

Discussion

In this study we found that 19.3% of children suspected with severe bacterial infections were having MRSA infection, which was similar to the 24.8% incidence by Kandasamy et al in a South Indian study5 which underscores the importance of surveillance of sick children for MRSA infections. CA MRSA infection (44, 53%) was more common than HA MRSA (39, 47%) in our study which is in agreement with other studies 6, 12, and 18 (46.2%) of HA MRSA infections were community onset. This shows that MRSA infections of community onset, which includes CA MRSA as well as community onset HA MRSA, constituted 74.7% of the MRSA infections. Similar findings were reported by previous studies also.5, 11, 12 This implies that clinician needs to consider MRSA as a possible pathogen during the evaluation of a sick child at the time of hospitalisation itself. CA MRSA and HA MRSA were found more in infants in this study similar to the other studies.10, 12, 13

Intra thoracic infections (38.6%), constituted by pneumonia (29%) and empyema (9.7%) were the commonest MRSA infection in our study. This is in contrast with a previous Indian study in children between 0 and 12 years, which showed SSTI constituting 42% of MRSA infections. 5 Similar to our findings, Gonzalez et al has reported pulmonary involvement as the commonest manifestation of MRSA infections14 and Kandasamy et al reported that 66% of empyema was caused by MRSA. 5 Skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) was the second most common (30.2%) MRSA infection in our study. A similar Indian study reported SSTI constituting 44% of MRSA infections. 15 In accordance with other studies, SSTI was predominantly (72%) caused by CA MRSA in our study also. 10, 15 A significant proportion (15,18.1%) of children in our study population were having septic shock, which was more (53.4%) in CA MRSA compared to HA MRSA. Kandasamy et al showed a 13% incidence of septic shock and Menif et al was showing a 28.6% incidence in a study on CA MRSA infections in children. 5, 13

Comorbidities were observed more in HA MRSA than CA MRSA (p value 0.01) in our study. Similar findings were reported earlier also.16 The increased mean hospital stay, PICU admission, requirement for ventilator support and mortality observed in HA MRSA patients compared to CA MRSA in our study seems contributed by the increased comorbidities associated with HA MRSA infections.

Six children in the study population were having meningitis due to MRSA, out of which two were CA MRSA and in all the patients, isolates were obtained from CSF.MRSA meningitis in previously healthy children has been reported sporadically. 5, 17

We studied the risk factors for PICU admission and mortality in children with MRSA infections and found that anaemia and thrombocytopenia were correlating with PICU admission (OR, corrected OR; 95% C I: p value 4.5, 3.38; 1.02 – 11.18: o.o4 and 12.6, 8.35; 1.35 – 45.03: 0.02 respectively) whereas thrombocytopenia showed a strong correlation with mortality (OR 25.3, corrected OR 43.74, 95% C I 3.86 – 495.9 and p value 0.02)

There was no resistance documented against vancomycin and linezolid in our study, as shown in other Indian studies. 3, 5, 18 Susceptibility to clindamycin (79.5%), co-trimoxazole (73.5%), amikacin (68.7%) and rifampicin (90.4%) were high, similar to the observations reported in other studies. 5, 12, 18 These antimicrobials can be used for the empiric treatment of suspected MRSA infections which are less severe, so that vancomycin and linezolid can be safeguarded against the development of bacterial resistance. There was no significant difference in the susceptibility pattern between CA MRSA and HA MRSA, except for gentamicin. Susceptibility to gentamicin by CA MRSA was 73.07% compared to the 26.92% by HA MRSA. Similar findings were documented earlier also. 15 The following conclusions were made from the present study. i) A significant proportion of invasive bacterial infections in children is caused by MRSA, majority being community onset type, ii) epidemiology of MRSA infections in children shows a change with predominance of pneumonia and empyema over SSTI, iii) clinician should consider MRSA as a potential etiologic agent during the management of septic shock and bacterial meningitis, iv) anaemia and thrombocytopenia are associated with adverse outcomes like PICU admission and/or mortality and v) clindamycin, co-trimoxazole and amikacin need to be utilised in the treatment of less severe MRSA infections. Limitations of the study were i) molecular characterization of the isolates not performed due to the lack of facilities and ii) the risk factors of MRSA infections not studied.

Conflicts of Interests

No conflicts of interests were disclosed.

Source of Funding

None.

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge Dr. Riyaz A, Dr. Jayakrishnan MP, Dr. Rajesh T V for their contributions in this work.

References

1 

M Jevons Celbenin” - resistant StaphylococciBr Med J1961152191245

2 

LD Saravolatz N Markowitz L Arking D Pohlod E Fisher Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Epidemiologic observations during a community-acquired outbreakAnn Intern Med 1982961116

3 

V Manchanda J Bajaj DS Chitnis V Gautam P Goswami V Gupta Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in India, Prevalence and susceptibility patternInd J Med Res201313723639

4 

K Mongkolrattanothai JC Aldag P Mankin BM Gray Kanokporn Mongkolrattanothai of community onset Staphylococcus aureus infections in Paediatrics patients, an experience at a Children's Hospital in central IllinoisBMC infect Dis2009911210.1186/1471-2334-9-112

5 

K Senthilkumar N Biswal S Sistla Risk factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in childrenIndian Pediatr2015521313

6 

N D'Souza C Rodrigues A Mehta Molecular characterization of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus with emergence of epidemic clones of sequence type (ST) 22 and ST 772 in Mumbai, IndiaJ Clin Microbiol2010485180611

7 

JM Voyich KR Braughton DE Sturdevant AR Whitney B Saïd-Salim SF Porcella Insights into mechanisms used by Staphylococcus aureus to avoid destruction by human neutrophilsJ Immunol20051756390719

8 

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2013, Performance standards for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, twenty third Informational supplement. M100-S232013https://clsi.org/media/3481/m100ed30_sample.pdf[September 24, 2014]

9 

C Krishnan T Lineesh P Ramesh Menon Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children – a prospective study [Dataset]Dryad0000-0001-6913-6692

10 

RM Klevens MA Morrison J Nadle S Petit K Gershman S Ray Invasive Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in the United StatesJAMA200729815176371

11 

B Goldstein B Giroir A Randolph International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatricsPediatr Crit Care Med20056128

12 

L Egea P Gagetti R Lamberghini D Faccone C Lucero A Vindel New patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones, community-associated MRSA genotypes behave like healthcare-associated MRSA genotypes within hospitals, ArgentinaInt J Med Microbiol20143048108699

13 

K Menif A Bouziri A Khaldi A Hamdi S Belhadj A Borgi Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in a pediatric intensive care unitJ Infect Dev Ctries20115858791

14 

BE Gonzalez KG Hulten MK Dishop LiB Lamberth WA Hammerman EO Mason Jr Pulmonary manifestations in children with invasive community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infectionClin Infect Dis200541558390

15 

C Bouchiat N El-Zeenni B Chakrakodi S Nagaraj G Arakere J Etienne Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Bangalore, India: emergence of the ST217 clone and high rate of resistance to erythromycin and ciprofloxacin in the communityNew Microbes New Infect20157152010.1016/j.nmni.2015.05.003

16 

K Purcell J Fergie Epidemic of community acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, a 14-year study at Driscoll Children’s HospitalArch Pediatr Adolesc Med2005159109805

17 

M Von Specht N Gardella P Tagliaferri G Gutkind M Mollerach Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in community acquired meningitisEur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis20062542679

18 

N Vijayamohan SP Nair A study of the prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dermatology patientsIndian Dermatol Online J2014544415



jats-html.xsl

© 2023 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)