Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 107

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 700


Sureshkumar, Pandian, Ganapathy, and Edward: A clinicopathological study of fungal diseases in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and sinonasal polyposis


Introduction

Rhinosinusitis (RS) is a substantial health problem that appears to emulate the cumulative frequency of allergic rhinitis, thereby imposing a huge financial affliction on society. RS is a broad term that encompasses manifold diseases like ARS (acute RS), CRSwNP (CRS with nasal polyps), besides CRSsNP (CRS without nasal polyps). 1 Chronic RS (CRS) has been found to affect almost 15% of the overall population. CRS is a disease with varied ailments with a characteristic sinonasal mucosa inflammation. However, the pathogenesis of this inflammatory disease is greatly influenced by various genetic and environmental parameters. 2 CRS delineates physical suffering and thereby laying the physiological aspects of life at stake.

CRS instigated by fungi is fungal rhinosinusitis (FRS) is a type of CRS in which patients develop an allergic response to the fungus colonizing the sino-nasal cavities and thereby producing mucin. 3 FRS is an exclusive pathologic entity, distinctive by the occurrence of a thick, eosinophilic allergic fungal mucin that involves multiple sinuses, usually bilateral; however, the encompassing of unilateral sinuses are also less common.4 Among the various fungal pathogens such as Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida sp., Sporothrix schenckii and Alternaria sp, Aspergillus sp and Mucorale fungi are the most pathogenic. 5 Also, demographic sub-type variations along with location-specific species have been reported worldwide. Common etiological FRS agents in India belong to Aspergillus sp, with a relatively higher incidence in the northern regions.6

FRS can be acute or chronic, broadly categorized as non-invasive or invasive based on fungal invasion into the tissue. Fungal sinusitis is seen in immunocompetent patients, although FRS is recurrently diagnosed in diabetic or immunocompromised patients. Although non-invasive FRS is required for both surgical and medical intermediation, invasive FRS can affect substantial morbidity besides mortality. FRS encompasses a wide spectrum of immune and pathological responses, including invasive, chronic, granulomatous, and allergic disease. 5 The fungus initiates hypersensitivity type I IgE reaction in patients allergic to fungus. The manifestations of the disease are predominantly driven by the eosinophilic host response to fungi within the sinuses.7 A cumulative prevalence rate of invasive FRS is upsurging, resulting in higher degree indisposition and mortality, especially in immunocompromised state. 8 However, a clear consensus on terminology, pathogenesis, and optimal management of FRS is still lacking. Henceforth a proper diagnosis of the etiological agent is vital for controlling the prognosis of FRS for the mediation of fungal infection through targeted antifungal therapy. Hence this study was to look into the prevalence of fungal diseases in all instances with sinonasal polyposis and chronic rhino-sinusitis that were hospitalised for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Aim

To study the prevalence of Fungal Diseases in all cases of Sinonasal polyposis and chronic rhino-sinusitis admitted for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Materials and Methods

This prospective observational study was done in the department of E.N.T & Head and Neck Surgery at Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital. Following approval from the Institutional scientific and ethics committee, 156 sinus secretions and polyps from patients of all age groups and of either sex who presented with radiologically proven sinusitis (CT scan) with symptoms > 12 weeks duration and undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery for 2 years from November 2017 to June 2019 was included in the study. Patients were interviewed by structured questionnaire after obtaining informed consent. All the patients were also clinically assessed after a detailed history, and satisfying the below-mentioned categories were included.

Inclusion criteria

All cases of CRS who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery in age groups and both male & female

Exclusion criteria

Patients who were on a topical or systemic steroid for the past 1 month before the study period. All cases with the characteristic appearance of fungi in DNE and during surgery. Cases with clinically appearing Malignant Nasal mass and Rhinosporidiosis

Samples of nasal sinus tissue, sinus secretions and allergic mucin from patients undergoing FESS were subjected to mycological culture. The specimen was collected in sterile saline operatively and taken to the microbiology lab as early as possible and was processed on the same day. The sample was subjected to direct microscopy with 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) and culture.

The material was teased and placed on a clean glass slide, and a drop of 10% KOH was added. A coverslip was placed and the preparation left at room temperature for tissue digestion and then examined by microscopy for the presence of fungal hyphal elements was noticed.

The specimen was inoculated in duplicate on Sabouraud’s dextrose agar with Gentamicin and Chloramphenicol. The inoculated media was incubated both at 25˚C and 37˚C. It was observed daily for one week and then twice weekly for three more weeks. Once fungal growth occurred, it was identified by observing its macroscopic and microscopic morphology. The microscopic morphology was studied by Lactophenol Cotton Blue (LPCB) mount. Slide culture was done when the morphology was unclear and species identification was impossible in the LPCB mount.

Results

Patients confirmed with CRS comprised 55% male and 45% female out of 156 samples belonging to the age category between 11 to 70. The highest percentage of infection was recorded among the age group 31 to 40 irrespective of gender, with a higher incidence in males. CRS prevalence among the age group 21-30 was also high (24%), followed by 41-50 (16%). An occupation-wise distribution study revealed the higher incidence of CRS in coolie workers (38%) followed by the housewife category (34%), a very less margin. Higher numbers of farmers were also identified with CRS.Table 1

Table 1

Distribution of patient characteristics

Patient Characteristics

Frequency

Percentage

Age group

0-10

0

0

11-20

23

15

21-30

38

24

31-40

43

28

41-50

25

16

51-60

14

9

61-70

13

8

71-80

0

0

Gender

Male

86

55

Female

70

45

Occupation

Coolie

59

38

Housewife

54

34

Farmers

12

8

Others

31

20

The symptomology of CRS included detecting the presence of headache, nasal discharge and obstruction, sneezing, cough, hyposmia, and any signs in the eye. Among the observed patients, nasal obstruction was recorded in higher rates (85%) followed by headache (56%) and nasal discharge (24%). Sneezing, cough and hyposmia were recorded at relatively lower rates in 32, 30, and 23 patients, respectively. Sign of infection in the eye was observed only in one patient.Table 2

Only 19% of CRS patients were identified with systemic disease that was dominated by diabetes mellitus (10%), followed by hypertension (6%), and 3% of patients were diagnosed with both diabetes and hypertension (HT).

Table 2

Distribution of symptoms and systemic diseases

Patient characteristics 

Frequency

Percentage

Symptoms

Headache

88

56.4%

Nasal Discharge

37

23.7%

Nasal Obstruction

132

84.6%

Sneezing

32

20.5%

Cough

23

14.7%

Hyposmia

30

19.2%

Eye Symptoms

1

0.6%

Systemic disease

Diabetes Mellitus

15

9.6%

Hypertension(HT)

9

5.8%

Both Diabetes & HT

4

2.6%

Neither Diabetes or HT

128

82.1%

The DNS study in CT revealed a predominant orientation to the left (22%) and lesser to the right (17%). 96 patients displayed no DNS (Graph 6b). Among the polyps observed in DNS, the bilateral polyp was found to have a major occurrence (23%), and only 21% of the bilateral polyp was observed. 58% of CRS patients displayed no polyp.

Regarding the involvement of sinuses in CRS, 69% of observed patients displayed pansinusitis. Other sinuses such as unilateral maxillary & ethmoid sinus (15%), unilateral Maxillary Sinus (15%), bilateral maxillary & ethmoid sinus (13%), bilateral maxillary sinuses (8%), bilateral ethmoid sinus (2%), and unilateral (1%), as well as bilateral (1%) ethmoid sinus, were observed.Table 3

Table 3

Distribution of polyp

Frequency

Percentage

Polyp in CT

Unilateral Polyp

19

12

Bilateral Polyps

34

22

Without polyp

103

66

Deviation in CT

DNS to right

26

17

DNS To left

34

22

Total patients without DNS

96

62

Polyp in DNE

Unilateral

33

21

Bilateral

36

23

No polyp

87

58

Sinus involvement in CT

Bilateral maxillary sinuses

13

8

Unilateral Maxillary Sinus

24

15

Bilateral maxillary & ethmoid sinus

20

13

Unilateral maxillary & ethmoid sinus

24

15

unilateral sphenoid sinus

1

1

Bilateral sphenoid sinus

0

0

Isolated frontal sinus

0

0

Bilateral ethmoid sinus

3

2

Unilateral ethmoid sinus

2

1

Pansinusitis

69

44

Culture results confirmed fungal presence in 11.5% of tested samples, and the remaining 88.5% came out negative for the presence of fungi. Fungal positivity was found in 20 patients by direct microscopic examination (KOH mount), displaying 18 culture-positive and 2 culture-negative cases. Similarly, 136 culture-negative cases were found through KOH mount negative test. A total of 18 culture-positive and 38 culture-negative results were obtained. Fungal identification test revealed the isolates as Aspergillus flavus (65%) and A. fumigatus (25%). A Mucor fungus was observed in samples of 2 patients. There were no recurrences recorded in a follow-up study.

Figure 1

Fungal culture

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/30d53dbe-d13f-44ca-9d1b-eef74e4d01fdimage1.png
Figure 2

Distribution of fungal isolates

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/30d53dbe-d13f-44ca-9d1b-eef74e4d01fdimage2.png
Figure 3

Mucor broad non septate hyphae

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/30d53dbe-d13f-44ca-9d1b-eef74e4d01fdimage3.png
Figure 4

Aspergillus thin septate hyphae with acute angle branching

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/30d53dbe-d13f-44ca-9d1b-eef74e4d01fdimage4.png

Discussion

Fungal rhinosinusitis is an extensive cluster of conditions instigated by fungal contagions of the paranasal sinuses. Though known for decades, the disease is gaining importance due to the increase in the incidence globally. 9 Due to the heterogeneity of the etiological components coupled with demographical influences and lacunae in the knowledge of the prognosis of the disease, management of FRS is becoming a difficult process. With the potential of FRS infection to cause a decline in the quality of life of infected patients and an upsurge in the frequency of the disease in South India, the current investigation was carried out to shed light on the prevalence, etiology, and progress of FRS in all cases of sinonasal polyposis and chronic rhino-sinusitis admitted for functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery The study is based on clinical, microbiological, and radiological observations of FRS patients over a period of 2 years. Additionally, the analysis was also focused on associating FRS with the environmental and the presence or absence of systemic diseases among the patients.

The study encompassed patients belonging to the inclusion/exclusion category. Among 156 samples analyzed, male: female ratio of FRS occurrence was 1.3:1, who belonged to the age group of 11 to 70, with males predominantly infected. The average year of the FRS patients was 34.5, delineating the middle-aged group as more susceptible. In a similar study conducted by Das et al. in patients with a mean average age of 31 years, male patients were predominantly affected with a male:female of 1.8:1. 10 Higher incidence rates were targeted at people belonging to the third decade (28%) that were also found in the reports of Kaur et al. 11 Predominant incidence in FRS in people belonging to the lower socio-economic group, coolie was recorded. This might be due to the increased susceptibility of their exposure to fungal spores.    

The symptomology was dominated by the observation of nasal obstruction trailed by headache then nasal discharge. In the symptomology study done by Ravindra et al. in FRS patients, nasal discharge was observed in higher numbers. 12 However, in another similar study carried out by Shivani et al., nasal obstruction was the most commonly occurring symptom. 13 Risk factors associated with the disease could be attributed to diabetes mellitus followed by hypertension. Relating FRS to the immunological status of patients, many associations of fungal infections in patients with systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension are reported in various case studies. 14

Radiology reports of FRS patients indicated the involvement of multiple sinuses. The common risk factor of FRS patients was designated to be the non-polyp condition compared with a polyp, which was dominated by bilateral polyps as well as the absence of DNS. Common involvement of bilateral sinuses indicates the risk factor as allergy instigated by the patient’s exposure to fungal spores. Other risk factors included FRS patients without a DNS. In a study conducted by Shivani et al. nasal polyps and DNS were the major risk factors associated with FRS. 13

Both culture and KOH mount studies revealed the presence of fungi in only 18 samples. Lower probabilities of appearance of fungi in direct culture as well as KOH mount were reported by Kaur et al. Culture studies revealed the presence of Aspergillus sp in a leading manner. 11 Among them, A. flavus was found in higher rates over A. fumigatus. A likely dominance of A. flavus in FRS patients was reported by various researchers. 9, 15, 16 Similar cultural characters were also reported in a clinicopathological and microbiological study of FRS conducted by Ravindra et al. 12 This could be related to the predominant presence of A. flavus spores in tropical soils and other environmental factors. 17 A fungal recurrence study after two years revealed the absence of fungal growth. Despite possessing a long historical prevalence, FRS is currently emerging as a severe disease. This study could be used to understand further the etymology and advancements of the disease that could be implemented to devise an efficient management plan.

Conclusion

The retrospective study involving FRS patients in the hospital proves that FRS is emerging as a common disease. With over 30% of CR patients diagnosed with FRS and increasing, the better understanding of the proper etiology and diagnosis of FRS, perilous complications, and indiscreet usage of antibiotics could be perverted for better management of FRS.

Conflicts of Interests

No conflicts of interests were disclosed.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

HN Kuhar BA Tajudeen M Mahdavinia P Gattuso R Ghai PS Batra Inflammatory infiltrate and mucosal remodeling in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without polyps: structured histopathologic analysisInt Forum Allergy Rhinol20177767989

2 

EL Palmisano M Benhammuda A Mehta MC Tobin CD Codispoti S Bandi Chronic rhinosinusitis patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease have significantly higher prevalence of atopic conditionsJ Allergy Clin Immunol20161372AB28510.1016/j.jaci.2015.12.1178

3 

PG Deutsch J Whittaker S Prasad Invasive and non-invasive fungal rhinosinusitis-a review and update of the evidenceMedicina (Kaunas)201955731910.3390/medicina55070319

4 

V Singh Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Unravelling the Disease SpectrumJ Maxillofac Oral Surg201918216479

5 

KT Montone Pathology of Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A ReviewHead Neck Pathol2016101406

6 

N Vandarkuzhali A study on the prevalence of fungal isolates among the Rhinosinusitis patients at Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital2022http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/8721/1/200400718vandarkuzhali.pdf

7 

MS Dykewicz JM Rodrigues RG Slavin Allergic fungal rhinosinusitisJ Allergy Clin Immunol2018142334151

8 

NE Elbadawy TE Meawed MW El-Anwar Laboratory approach for detection of non-invasive fungal rhinosinusitis: A case-control studyInt Arab J Antimicrob Agents201611611810.3823/782

9 

A Chakrabarti Clinical Practice of Medical Mycology in AsiaSpringerNew York, NY, USA2020

10 

KT Montone Pathology of Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A ReviewHead Neck Pathol2016101406

11 

R Kaur S Lavanya N Khurana A Gulati MS Dhakad Invasive fungal rhinosinusitis: An observational study in an Indian tertiary care hospitalLung Dis Treat20162210910.4172/2472-1018.1000109

12 

P Ravindra B Viswanatha A clinicopathological and microbiological study of fungal rhinosinusitisHeadache20191114952

13 

DB Shivani K Sharma P Devi DG Rupali Mycological profile of fungal rhinosinusitis in a tertiary care hospitalInt J Contemp Med20163410268

14 

P Ngaotepprutaram P Tantilipikorn P Wongtawornruang K Amornphichetkul SO Tritrakarn P Ngamskulrungroj Mortality Rate and Predictive Factors for Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Experience in Siriraj HospitalSiriraj Med J20187013643

15 

J Leszczyńska G Stryjewska-Makuch G Lisowska B Kolebacz M Michalak-Kolarz Fungal sinusitis among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent endoscopic sinus surgeryOtolaryngol Pol20187243541

16 

AB Singh R Upadhyay N Tayal Diagnostic and treatment challenges in management of allergic fungal rhinosinusitisIndian J Allergy20173123810.4103/ijaai.ijaai_31_16

17 

P Pandey NS Pandey R Chaturvedi Prevention and Control Strategies of Aflatoxin Contamination. InBio-management of Postharvest Diseases and Mycotoxigenic Fungi CRC Press202022334



jats-html.xsl

© 2023 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)