Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 121

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 52


Jain, Jain, and Jain: Identification of vancomycin resistance in enterococcus & determination of minimal inhibitory concentration of vancomycin by E-test


Introduction

Group D streptococci include enterococci which are facultative anaerobes that naturally present in human intestine.1, 2 Enterococci have grown in importance not only due to their capability to develop life threatening infections, but also due to their growing resistance to several antibacterial agents. Antibiotic treatment for severe enterococcal infections frequently fails due to frequent resistance to antimicrobial agents & patient death rate is extremely high.2

The first glycopeptide antibiotic to be identified was vancomycin. Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates were the first to be linked to vancomycin resistance.3 The first report of enterococci resistant to vancomycin was made in Europe & it spread rapidly to a huge section of globe.

Vancomycin works by disrupting the trans-glycosylation process, which then affects the trans-peptidation, in order to impede the creation of peptidoglycan precursors of the cell wall of bacteria.4, 5 For the cross-linking of the bacterial cell wall both trans-glycosylation as well as trans-peptidation processes are required.

Although the genus Enterococcus contains 12 species, E. faecalis and E. faecium are the most prevalent ones. Prevalence of vancomycin resistance in E. faecium caused the frequency of its isolation to rise as it is a more resistant species than E. faecalis.6

Taking these factors into account, the current research was carried out in our hospital to isolate and identify vancomycin-resistant enterococcal strains with an antibiogram and to establish their MIC via an E-test.

Materials and Methods

The current research was conducted in department of Microbiology. Total of 54 enterococci isolates from different samples (urine, blood, pus, and wound swabs) received for microbiological investigation at the Institute’s Bacteriology Laboratory in the previous 12 months was examined. Conventional methods were used to identify all of the isolates.7

Antimicrobial susceptibility to linezolid cefaparazone, amoxyclav, cefotaxime, clindamycin, erythromycin, amikacin, ofloxacin, vancomycin was determined by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion Method8 on MHA(Muller-Hinton agar). The MIC level for vancomycin was determined for each isolate using the E-test from BIOMERIEUX, India, and ranged 0.016 g/ml to 256 g/ml.

Result

In a total of 108 patients who had enterococci, 78 (72%) were female and 30 (28%) were male. (Figure 1)

Age group of 16 to 30 years saw highest prevalence of enterococci (61.2%), followed by 31 to 45 years (16.8 %), 46 to 60 years (14 %), >60 years (8.4 %), and up to 15 years (3.7%).(Table 1)

Out of total 108 enterococci isolates most of were isolated from urine 56(51.8%) followed by pus 24(22.2%) by conventional method. (Figure 2)

Out of total 108 enterococci isolates maximum resistance was seen in clindamycin62, followed by erythromycin 60, amikacin 44, ofloxacin 28, amoxyclav 28 and linezolid 22 by Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method.(Table 2, Figure 3)

Out of total 108 isolates VRE (vancomycin resistant enterococci) were detected in 40 (37.1%) patients, by E-test for MIC of Vancomycin, among them 14 (35%) were males and 26 (65%) were females.

Age wise distribution of VRE isolates shown in Table 3.

Out of 40 VRE isolates 22(55%) were isolated from urine samples followed by 12(30%) from pus and 6(15%) from swab.

E-test was used to test 108 isolates for vancomycin MIC, of which 40 (37.03%) (22 E. faecalis & 18 E. faecium) were determined to be vancomycin resistant (VRE) strains, having MIC level >32 g/ml. It was discovered that 18 strains out of 40 (or 45%) had MIC >256 g/ml. (Figure 3)

Figure 1

Sex wise distribution of patient

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/ceba5ea9-9369-46d6-97c5-710a4a0bad01image1.png
Table 1

Age-based distribution of isolates of enterococci

Age ( years)

No. of isolates

Up to 15

04(3.7%)

16-30

66(61.2%)

31-45

16(14.8%)

46-60

14(13%)

More than 60

08(7.4%)

Total

108

Figure 2

Distribution of enterococci in various clinical specimens

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/ceba5ea9-9369-46d6-97c5-710a4a0bad01image2.png
Table 2

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern by KirbyBaur disk diffusion method in enterococci isolates

Antibiotic tested

Sensitive

Resistant

Clindamycin

46

62

Erythromycin

48

60

Amikacin

64

44

Ofloxacin

80

28

Amoxyclav

80

28

Linezolid

86

22

Cefaparazone

76

32

Figure 3

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern in enterococci isolates

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/ceba5ea9-9369-46d6-97c5-710a4a0bad01image3.png
Table 3

Age-based distribution of VRE isolates

Age (years)

No. of isolates

Up to 15

02 (5%)

16-30

24 (60%)

31-45

08 (20%)

46-60

02 (5%)

More than 60

04 (10%)

Total

40

Figure 4

E-test for MIC of vancomycin in enterococci isolates

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/ceba5ea9-9369-46d6-97c5-710a4a0bad01image4.png

Discussion

One of the most serious global issues is drug resistance. Drug resistant Gram Positive & Negative bacteria has been documented in numerous researches from both India and abroad.8, 9

This study's objectives were to identify enterococcal infections in a variety of samples to analyze distribution of antibiotic resistance with an emphasis on vancomycin resistance, and to identify vancomycin resistance using the E-test method.

In the current research, enterococcal infections were more prevalent in women (72%). Other researchers have also found higher prevalence in females ranges from 46% to 50%.10, 11

The majority of the enterococcal isolates in the current study were isolated from urine samples (51.8%). Similar findings from other studies have also been reported.12, 13

However some studies reported that greatest number of enterococcal isolates were obtained from pus samples.14, 15

In our investigation, the age group of 16 to 30 years accounted for the majority (61.2%) of the VRE positive isolates from different samples. However, just a few studies found that cases of VRE positivity in people between the ages of 61 and 75 were 5.2% and 12.7%, respectively.16 According to several researches, patients with highly resistant Enterococci ranged in age from 18 years old to 71 years old.17

Through the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method, the antibiotic sensitivity pattern in our study reveals that clindamycin 31 was the most resistant drug for enterococcus, followed by erythromycin 30, amikacin 22, ofloxacin 14, amoxyclav 14, vancomycin 13, and linezolid 11. However, when 108 isolates (62 E. faecalis and 46 E. faecium) were examined using the E-test for vancomycin's MIC, 40 (37.03%) of them (22 E. faecalis and 18 E. faecium) were discovered to be VRE strains. According to several researches, gentamicin (58.0%), tetracycline (47.1%), and ampicillin (43%) were the drugs against which Enterococci were most resistant, whereas vancomycin and linezolid (18) showed no resistance.18

Conclusion

For the Indian medical community, the rise of antibiotic resistance among Enterococcal species has been a significant concern. The inherent resistance of Enterococcus to a number of regularly used antimicrobial agents & more importantly, its capacity to develop resistance to all presently available antibacterial drugs, both contribute significantly to their survival in hospital environments. Laboratories must be well-equipped to report the resistance patterns displayed by enterococci in order to practise evidence-based medicine and reduce hospital acquired infections.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

PJ Desai D Pandit M Mathur A Gogate Prevalence,identification and distribution of various species of enterococci isolated from clinical specimens with special reference to urinary tract infection in catheterized patientsIndian J Med Microbiol20011931327

2 

BE Murray The life and times of the enterococciClin Microbiol Rev1990314665

3 

BE Murray EC Nannini GL Mandell JE Bennet R Dolin Glycopeptides (Vancomycin and Teicoplanin), Streptogramins (Quinupristin- Dalfopristin), and Lipopeptides (Daptomycin)Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 7th Edn.Churchill LivingstonePhiladelphia, Pa, USA201044968

4 

Y Cetinkaya P Falk CG Mayhall Vancomycin-Resistant EnterococciClin Microbiol Rev2000134686707

5 

P Courvalin Vancomycin resistance in gram-positive cocciClin Infect Dis20064212534

6 

LB Rice Emergence of vancomycin resistant EnterococciEmerg Infect Dis2001721837

7 

P Courvalin Vancomycin resistance in gram-positive cocciClin Infect Dis20064212534

8 

AW Bauer WM Kirby JC Sherries M Turck Streptococcus and EnterococcusMackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology (14th Edn)45Churchill LivingstoneLondon19664936

9 

K Andadi S Jadhav RN Mishra SB Mirza D Desai Incidence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcal infections in tertiary care hospitalIntrl J Microbial Res201810411358

10 

Y Carmeli G Eliopoulos M Samore Antecedent treatment with different antibiotic agents as a risk factor for vancomycin-resistant EnterococcusEmerg Infect Dis2002888027

11 

S Gordon JM Swenson BC Hill NE Pigott RR Facklam RC Cooksey Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of common and unusual species of enterococci causing infections in the United States. Enterococcal Study GroupJ Clin Microbiol199230923738

12 

S Gordon JM Swenson BC Hill NE Pigott RR Facklam RC Cooksey Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of common and unusual species of enterococci causing infections in the United States. Enterococcal Study GroupJ Clin Microbiol199230923738

13 

K Ruoff L De La Maza M Mrtagh J Spargo M Ferraro Species identities of enterococci isolated from clinical specimensJ Clin Microbiol19902834357

14 

U Chaudhary M Shamma A Yadav Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of common and unusual Enterococcus species isolated from clinical specimensJ Infect Antimicrob Agents2007245562

15 

P Vandamme E Vercauteren C Lammens N Pensart M Ieven B Pot Survey of enterococcal susceptibility patterns in BelgiumJ Clin Microbiol1996341025726

16 

GB Modi ST Soni KJ Patel HM Goswami MM Vegad Prevalence ofvancomycin resistant Enterococci in tertiaty care hospital, western IndiaInt J Microbiol Res2012421825

17 

A Javadi B Ataei F Khorvash S Toghyani S Mobasherzadeh M Soghrati Prevalence of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci Colonization in Gastrointestinal Tract of Hospitalized PatientsIran J Clin Infect20083313741

18 

S Bose KA Ghosh R Barapatre Prevalence of drug resistance among Enterococcus species isolated from a tertiary care hospitalInt J Med Health Sci201213844



jats-html.xsl

© 2024 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)