Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 2

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 111

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 45


Sasane, Gore, and Shekhawat: omparative study of fetal doppler versus non stress test as predictor of perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancy between 36 to 42 weeks


Introduction

Pregnancy is a unique and physiological event of woman’s life. Any pregnancy can turn into a high risk one any time during its course. A high-risk pregnancy is one where the mother or the fetus has increased risk of adverse outcomes compared to uncomplicated pregnancies. It increases the chances of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity.

In India about 20-30% of pregnant women constitute high-risk criteria, accounting for 75% of perinatal deaths and 80% of maternal deaths.1

Antepartum fetal monitoring is of colossal importance for detection of fetal compromise in high risk pregnancies. Fetal asphyxia is one of the major reason of still birth and neonatal death.2

The aim of the antepartum monitoring is to diagnose fetal hypoxia promptly in order to prevent subsequent acidemia and brain damage.

The fetal wellbeing is acessed by various methods like fetal movement assessment, non-stress test, contraction stress test, fetal biophysical profile, modified biophysical profile, vibro-acoustic stimulation and UAD velocimetry.3 Biochemical methods of fetal monitoring are less favorable than biophysical methods because of the problem of sample collection, accuracy and need for laboratory technology and personnel.

NST is the commonly used basis test done for assessment of fetal well-being. It discerns 50% more fetuses with an abnormal fetal heart rate pattern than intermittent auscultation.

The good utero-placental circulation development is essential for achievement of a normal outcome of fetus and mother.1 Fetal-maternal Doppler assessment has been shown to be the gold standard to access placental development and function.

Doppler ultrasound reflects downstream impedance. It is based on physical principal of Doppler Effect. 2, 3, 4, 5 It accurately evaluates uteroplacental function. There is significant reduction in perinatal mortality when UAD is included in the treatment of high risk pregnancy. 6

The majority of fetuses with acidemia can be identified with the arterial and venous doppler testing (sensitivity 70-90% and specificity 70-80%). 6, 7, 8

The aim of the was to study two different aspects of fetal monitoring the NST and Doppler Velocimetry for monitoring high risk pregnancies with probable placental cause of pathology and to assess the perinatal outcomes.

This study was done to find out the comparative usefulness of Doppler and NST in the management of high risk pregnancies and subsequent correlation with perinatal outcome.

Materials and Methods

The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Smt Kashibai Nave Medical College and Hospital, a tertiary care facility, conducted this comparative study on 200 pregnant women between 36 and 42 weeks of pregnancy in December 2016 - January 2018. Pregnant women with high-risk singleton pregnancies except multiple gestations, cardiovascular illness, essential hypertension, and congenital defects in the foetus were included in the study.

After ANC check up and blood reports, colour Doppler and NST was done in all women. Using the Biosysfetal monitor (BFM-800), NST was performed. NST was interpreted according to American college of Obstetricians guidelines.

Fetal colour Doppler was done on a Doppler machine having a biconvex abdominal probe of 3.5 MHz frequency, Toshiba machine. Fetal umbilical artery was scanned. Resistance index and Systolic to diastolic ratio of umbilical artery, called the pulsatility index were calculated. Doppler study were considered abnormal when S/D ratio of umbilical artery is >3. PI is >0.99 and RI is >0.7

According to their NST and Doppler findings all foetuses were categorised in four sub-groups.

Group 1: NST Reassuring + Colour Doppler-normal

Group 2: NST Reassuring + Colour Doppler- fetal hypoxia

Group 3: NST Non Reassuring + Colour Doppler- normal

Group 4: NST Non Reassuring + Colour Doppler-fetal hypoxia

On the basis of maternal outcome, the analysis was done. It includes gestational age at time of delivery and mode of delivery and perinatal outcome - Agar score <7 at 5 min, Birth weight, Perinatal morbidity and mortality and NICU admission.

Results

Age distribution varied from 18 to 35 years in the study. Of these 52% were from age group of 21 to 25 yrs. Of these 24.5% of women were from the age group of 26-30 yrs, 16% were in the age group of less than 20 yrs and 7.5% of were in the age group of more than 30 yrs respectively. 52% were primigravida and 48% were multigravida. Most of the pregnancies were terminated at gestational age of 37.4 weeks.

Figure 1

Maternal high risk factors

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7183d787-7d5d-4319-90bc-0fcf32afe8adimage1.png

63.5% of the women were PIH, 13.5% were IUGR, 7.5% were oligohydramnios, 10.5% were GDM, and 5% were Rh-negative pregnancy.(Figure 1)

NST was reactive in 86% and was non-reactive in 14%. Umbilical artery Doppler was insignificant in 88% while 12% had significant changes. Out of 24 women, 7 (29%) displayed reversal of diastolic flow and 17 (71%) displayed absent end diastolic flow.

98 (49%) women underwent caesarean section out of which 23% were emergency and remaining 77% were elective. 23 women had caesarean section for fetal distress, 34 for severe PIH, 19 for failed induction, 14 for IUGR, 7 for severe oligohydramnios.

Table 1

High risk pregnancy - perinatal outcome.

Neonatal parameters

Group 1 (n=162 ) NST - R Doppler - N

Group 2 (n=10 ) NST - R Doppler - Abn

Group 3 (n=14 ) NST - NR Doppler – N

Group 4 (n=14 ) NST - NR Doppler - Abn

Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes

4

8

0

7

Average birth weight

2.6 kg

2 kg

2.3 kg

1.2 kg

NICU admission

8

10

0

14

Gestational age (weeks)

38

37

37

36

Neonatal deaths

0

1

0

7

In the current research, 15 of the 19 babies had Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes showed aberrant Doppler velocities. In this study, Group 4 had a low average birth weight where NST was non-reassuring and umbilical artery doppler displayed significant changes. When Doppler was abnormal, NICU admissions were 5% in Group 1 and 100% in Group 2 and 4. Further low mean gestational age in group 4.(Table 1)

Table 2

Sensitivity and specificity of umbilical artery Doppler.

TP

TN

FP

FN

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Umbilical Artery

24

40

2

32

43%

95.2%

92.3%

56%

Infant mortality in high risk Pregnancy

In the current investigation, women with abnormal Umbilical artery Doppler were shown to have the greatest rates of perinatal mortality and morbidity. When NST and Doppler parameters were abnormal i.e. Group 4 experienced 6 newborn fatalities while Group 2 experienced 1.

Prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis were the three main causes of infant fatalities.

The current study found that the umbilical artery was 43% sensitive, 95.2% specific, 92.3% positive predictive and 56% negative predictive for perinatal morbidity and mortality. (Table 2)

Discussion

High-risk expectant mothers require a highly accurate, specific, non-invasive diagnostic test that can be used extensively.

Out of 200 women in our study, 52% were between the ages of 21 and 25. The early marriage age and early career start for obstetricians in our nation may be the cause of this. This finding closely resembles with Malikarjunappa et al9 and Nagar T et al.10

56% of the women were first-time mothers. This is comparable to the study of Verma U.11 Most of the pregnancies were terminated at gestational age of 37.4 weeks which correspondence with Verma U (37.4)11 study. But in the study of Deshmukh A et al the mean age of termination was 34.4.12

The major risk factor was Pregancy induced hypertension was (64%) and then IUGR (14%) which is comparable to Srivastava et Al.13

12% of the women in the current study exhibited a doppler aberration, which is consistent with the investigations conducted by Choudhury et al (7%). 14

The rate of caesarean section in present study was 49% which is lower than the studies of Young Byun JI et al.15 23% of women had emergency caesarean section because of foetal distress and severe PIH. This correlates with results of Choudhury et al (23%). 14

Onset of labour was spontaneous in 44% in NST group and 39% in Colour Doppler group.54% of the patients in the NST group were induced of which 16% delivered vaginally. In the Color Doppler group 57% of the cases were induced of which 36% delivered vaginally. If identified early, and terminated at right time these foetuses experienced less distress, which yielded a lower caesarean delivery rate.

In this study, perinatal mortality was 4% while study of Choudhury et al showed 3%.14 According to our research, the poorest perinatal outcome was related with an abnormal Doppler followed by non reactive NST. Initially increased impedance to flow in the umbilical artery may progress to absent and then reversed end diastolic flow. This negative progression correlates with hypoxia, acidosis, and fetal death. 8% of the women had absent end-diastolic flow, which is consistent with studies by Prasad G V16 and Manikyrao.17 4% displayed reversed end diastolic flow. There was no perinatal mortality in 1st n 3rd group. 4th group showed 5 more perinatal deaths than Group 2. This result was in line with the findings of Gomathi V et al study. 18

Umbilical artery Doppler in the current study group showed specificity of 95.2% and PPV of 92.3% in predicting unfavourable perinatal outcome. This is consistent with research by Khanduri et al19 (specificity: 94.4%, PPV: 96.3%) and Malik et al20 (specificity: 80%, PPV: 96.6%).

The mean birth weight was 2.4 kg, which is consistent with the results of Sharma U et al.21 Early pregnancy termination due to foetal interest, doppler anomalies were linked to low birth weight in neonates. In our investigation, a severe PIH omen with REDF in the umbilical artery doppler had the lowest birth weight, which was 1.13 kg.

Because of ongoing foetal monitoring and prompt intervention, the majority of the newborns had good Apgar scores. The current study found that 12% of neonates were admitted to the NICU, which is comparable to the study by Choudhury et al. Preterm birth, low birth weight, and respiratory distress were the reasons for NICU hospitalisation.

Conclusion

NST was introduced with the aim of reducing perinatal mortality and morbidity. It is most widely used test. Normal NST signifies normal fetal condition. It is important for foetal monitoring in underdeveloped nations like India since it is simple to do and is cost-effective though it is inadequate to preclude an acute asphyxial event.

Doppler represents uteroplacental function. Introduction of Doppler velocimetry as a primary screening test must balance any advantages against its necessary training and associated costs. Umbilical artery Doppler abnormalities represent the negative progression from fetal adaptation to failure. Doppler assessment, compared with an NST, identified a higher proportion of patients with early placental compromise which gives lead time to intervene and reduce risks of fetal death with the hazards of preterm birth.

Limitation of the Study

In the study only Umbilical artery Doppler assessment was done. Other parameters like uterine artery Doppler, middle cerebral artery Doppler and cerebroplacental index were not taken into consideration. There is an absolute need for larger studies designed to correlate all the above Doppler parameters together and also at earlier gestational age.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

K Rao S Sheshadri Doppler Fetal dopplerAsian J Obstet Gynecol2003771722

2 

ACOG practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Number 9, October 1999 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 188, January 1994). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologistsInt J Gynaecol Obstet199968917585

3 

M Preboth ACOG guidelines on antepartum fetal surveillance. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsAm Fam Physician200062511847

4 

Acog Practice bulletin no. 145: antepartum fetal surveillanceObstet Gynecol2014124118292

5 

AB Bhatt PD Tank KB Barmade KR Damania Abnormal Doppler flow velocimetry in the growth restricted foetus as a predictor for necrotising enterocolitisJ Postgrad Med20034831825

6 

R Gagnon MV Hof The use of fetal Doppler in obstetricsJ Obstet Gynaecol Can200325760114

7 

AA Baschat Doppler application in the delivery timing of preterm growth-restricted fetus: another step in the right directionUltrasound Obstet Gynecol20042321118

8 

G Rizzo A Capponi P E Talone D Arduini C Romanini Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth-retarded fetusesUltrasound Obstet Gynecol19967640110

9 

B Mallikarjunappa H Harish SR Ashish RS Pukale Doppler changes in pre-eclampsiaJIMSA20132612718

10 

T Nagar D Sharma M Choudhary S Khoiwal RP Nagar A Pandita The role of uterine and umbilical arterial doppler in high-risk pregnancy: a prospective observational study from IndiaClin Med Insights Reprod Health201591510.4137/CMRH.S24048

11 

U Verma R Garg R Rani Comparative study of foetal colour doppler versus non-stress test as a predictor of perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancyObstet Gynecol Int J2015262169

12 

A Deshmukh N Soni S Gokhale Significance of umbilical artery doppler velocimetry in the perinatal outcome of the growth restricted fetusesJ Obstet Gynaecol India20106013843

13 

M Srivastava T Gupta K Dalmia KH Premi S Srivastava Non stress test versus doppler velocimetry in determining perinatal outcome in high risk pregnanciesInt J Contemp Med Res20218216

14 

N Choudhury BK Sharma BK Kanungo R Yadav H Rahman Assessment of Doppler velocimetry versus nonstress test in antepartum surveillance of high-risk pregnancyInt J Rep Contracept Obstet Gynecol20176266370

15 

YJ Byun HS Kim JI Yang JH Kim HY Kim SJ Chang Umbilical artery Doppler study as a predictive marker of perinatal outcome in preterm small for gestational age infantsYonsei Med J20095013944

16 

GV Prasad J Sarvottam Role of doppler study in the evaluation of intrauterine growth retardationJ Evi Med Healthcare2015242726675

17 

S Manikyarao N Baby Indira S Gayathri Role of colour doppler in pregnancy induced hypertensionIndian J Appl Res20155445960

18 

V Gomathi K Mythili Colour Doppler Verses NST in Predicting Perinatal Outcome in Severe Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth RestrictionJ Evol Med Dent Sci2015439680410

19 

S Khanduri UC Parashari S Bashir S Bhadury A Bansal Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery waveform with color Doppler study for detection of intrauterine growth restrictionJ Obstet Gynecol India201363424955

20 

M Rajesh S Agamya Role of colour doppler indices in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation in high- risk pregnanciesJ Obst Gynec India20136313744

21 

S Urmila B Beena Triple vessel wave pattern by Doppler studies in normal and high-risk pregnancies and perinatal outcomeJ Obstet Gynecol India20106043126



jats-html.xsl

© 2024 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)