Background
The health and wellbeing of people is essential for maintaining the healthy lifestyle and achieving the goals. In recent times, there has been increasing emphasis on association between autoimmune thyroid disease and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, the causality of the association is uncertain, but these two conditions share a bidirectional relationship.1 Although, both the syndromes share similar traits, yet no study has been able to determine the exact nature between these two. 2 As per the studies, PCOS is very common endocrinopathy in reproductive women and those with oligo-anovulation and hyperandrogenism. The rate of prevalence in premenopausal women is between 6-10% worldwide and in India it is around 5-10%. 3 Globally, PCOS is directly associated with high economic burden. Infertility, use of fertility hormone treatment and hospitalization are the major contributing factors. In 2020, the estimated economic burden of PCOS in USA was $3.7 billion annually.
It is characterized by oligo or anovulation, hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries. According to analysis, the family history is also playing a significant role in pathogenesis of PCOS. Interaction of small number of key genes responsible for most of the endocrine and metabolic symptom with environmental risk factors have impact on high prevalence of PCOS. 4 According to analysis of previous studies, PCOS is clinically manifest syndrome. The etiopathophysiology of PCOS is unclear and it can be occurred from the abnormal functions of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis. There is also an association between PCOS and peripheral insulin resistance and hyper-insulinemia, which are directly associated with obesity. 5 PCOS is considered as an endocrine metabolic disorder that occurs due to multiple imbalances of the thyroid gland. The imbalance in the thyroid is having impact on the reproductive biology. 6 According to clinical study, this kind of condition is having a significant impact on Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Prolactin and GnRH secretion. 7, 8
Thyroid dysfunction and PCOS is considered to have a profound effect on fertility and reproduction. 9 Thyroid dysfunction interferes with ovarian functions and infertility that have direct impact on the menstrual pattern. As per the outcome of the clinical studies, the low SHBG in hypothyroid increases the serum testosterone that contribute to the symptoms of PCOS. 10 Dysfunctional uterine bleeding and infertility are the consequences of anovulatory menstrual cycles. The menstrual irregularities in PCOS usually present around the time of menarche. 11 Thus, this paper intends to evaluate the thyroid function and autoimmune status in subjects with PCOS and determine if routine evaluation of these parameters should be considered to improve the menstrual rhythm, fertility and pregnancy related outcome in these subjects.
Aim of the Study
The study aims to estimate thyroid profile in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome and comparing it with healthy cases. It also focuses to estimate anti TPO in cases and control.
Method and Material
The samples were collected from PCOS patients attending the OPD in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rajarajeshwari Medical college and Hospital, Bangalore from December 2014 to May 2016. Seventy-five cases of PCOS patients in the age group of 20-40 years, diagnosed according to Rotterdam criteria, ascertained by ultrasonography, and seventy-five age matched healthy women (control) with regular menstrual cycle in the age group of 20-40 years were selected.
Method of collection of data
Patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study after obtaining written informed consent. A thorough medical history and detailed physical examination was performed for everyone. A pre-structured and pre-tested proforma was used to collect the data.
Method of collection of sample
Under full aseptic precautions, 5ml of venous whole blood sample was collected from the cubital vein from both study and control group, in clot activator containing vacuum evacuated tubes and were properly labelled. Precautions were taken to prevent hemolysis. Samples were brought to Clinical Biochemistry laboratory and centrifuged after clotting and retraction at room temperature. Clear serum was collected and subsequently analyzed.
The following investigations were performed by fully automated analyzer
Statistical analysis
The data was entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed in SPSS V28. Mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables were calculated for the study population. Difference in the group means of quantitative variables was compared by two tailed student t test at 95% significance level.
Results
Table 1
Table 1 has provided the information related to the age distribution for both case and control group. Both groupshad 75 patients and mean age of case group was 30.13 (SD = 5.32) years and mean age of control group was 28.54 (SD = 6.78) years.
Table 2
T3 |
Group |
Mean |
Std Dev |
SE of Mean |
Mean Difference |
T |
P-Value |
Cases |
127.13 |
51.23 |
5.92 |
-10.446 |
-1.152 |
0.251 |
|
Controls |
137.57 |
59.49 |
6.87 |
Table 2 has provided the comparative analysis of T3 for both groups. As per the analysis, the mean value of T3 for case group was 127.13 (SD = 51.23) and control group was 137.57 (SD = 59.49). There was no significant difference in T3 between the two groups (p>0.05).
Table 3
T4 |
Group |
Mean |
Std Dev |
SE of Mean |
Mean Difference |
T |
P-Value |
Cases |
8.17 |
2.50 |
0.29 |
-1.282 |
-3.306 |
0.001* |
|
Controls |
9.45 |
2.24 |
0.26 |
Table 3 has compared T4 between both groups. According to analysis, the mean value of T4 for case group was 8.17 (SD = 2.50) and control group was 9.45 (SD = 2.24), showing significant difference in T4 between the groups (p<0.05). T4 was significantly lower in case group.
Table 4
TSH |
Group |
Mean |
Std Dev |
SE of Mean |
Mean Difference |
T |
P-Value |
Cases |
4.05 |
4.09 |
0.47 |
1.129 |
2.008 |
0.0425 |
|
Controls |
2.92 |
2.64 |
0.31 |
Table 4 has analysed the mean value of TSH for both groups. As per the analysis, the mean value for case group was 4.05 (SD = 4.09) and for control group was 2.92 (SD = 2.64). Analysis shows a significant difference in TSH between the groups (p<0.05). TSH was significantly higher for case group.
Table 5
Table 5 has provided the information related to the prevalence of thyroid disorder in case group considering the TSH with respect to age. According to analysis, the 73.33% patients were euthyroid, 6.66% were sub clinical hyperthyroid, 14.66% were subclinical hypothyroid and 5.33% were clinical hypothyroid.
Table 6
According to Table 6, 65 subjects had the normal TSH value, and most numbers of subjects were between the ages of 20-25 year. There were 2 subclinical Hyperthyroid subjects, 6 Subclinical Hypothyroid subjects, and 2 subjects had Clinical Hypothyroid.
Table 7
Anti TPO |
Group |
Mean |
Std Dev |
SE of Mean |
Mean Difference |
T |
P-Value |
Cases |
55.40 |
143.17 |
16.53 |
33.426 |
1.987 |
0.0452 |
|
Controls |
21.97 |
26.99 |
3.12 |
Table 7 has analysed the anti-TPO for case and control. According to analysis, the mean value for case group was 55.40 (SD = 143.17) and control group was 21.97 (SD = 26.99). There was a significant difference in Anti TPO between the groups (p<0.05). Anti TPO was significantly higher for case group.
Table 8
According to Table 8, out of 16 positive cases 43.75% were euthyroid, 37.5% were subclinical hypothyroid and 18.75% were clinical hypothyroid. On the other hand, out of 9 anti-TPO positive control 55.55% were euthyroid and 44.44% were subclinical hypothyroid.
Table 9
Thyroid Status |
Cases (n) |
Anti TPO + cases |
Control(n) |
Anti TPO+ controls |
Euthyroid |
55 |
7 (12.7%) |
65 |
5 (7.7%) |
Subclinical Hypothyroid |
11 |
6 (54.5%) |
6 |
4 (66.9%) |
Clinical Hypothyroid |
4 |
3 (75%) |
2 |
0 |
Table 9 has provided the information related to prevalence of anti-TPO positivity in euthyroid and hypothyroid PCOS for both case and control group. According to analysis, in case group, out of 55 euthyroid patients, 12.7% were Anti TPO+, out of 11 subclinical hypothyroid patients, 54.5% were Anti TPO+, and out of 4 clinical hypothyroid patients, 75% were Anti TPO+. On the other hand, in control group, out of 65 euthyroid patients, 7.7% were Anti TPO+, and out of 6 subclinical hypothyroid patients, 66.9% were Anti TPO+.
Discussion
PCOS is associated with elevated androgen level and is most common form of chronic anovulation with a prevalence of 5-10%.12 It has been considered as heterogeneous disorder of multi-factorial etiology. Apart from this, it is involving the obesity and insulin resistance and compounded by the non-obese women with PCOS. According to analysis, PCOS is associated with reproductive morbidity that include infertility, irregular uterine bleeding and increased pregnancy loss.
As per current study, both groups had 75 patients and mean age of case group was 30.13 (SD = 5.32) years and mean age of control group was 28.54 (SD = 6.78) years. According to analysis, the 73.33% patients were euthyroid, 6.66% were sub clinical hyperthyroid, 14.66% were subclinical hypothyroid and 5.33% were clinical hypothyroid. As per the findings of current study, the mean value of T3 for case group was 127.13 (SD = 51.23) and control group was 137.57 (SD = 59.49). There was no significant difference in T3 between the two groups (p>0.05). Moreover, the mean value of T4 for case group was 8.17 (SD = 2.50) and control group was 9.45 (SD = 2.24), showing significant difference in T4 between the groups (p<0.05). T4 was significantly lower in case group. As per the study of Uma Sinha et al (2013) 13 with a mean value of 2.97 ± 1.56 vs 2.12 ± 1.05 p<0.001 for T3 and 1.37 ± 3.04 vs 1.05 ± 3.14 p <0.001 for T4 respectively.
According to analysis, out of 16 anti-TPO positive cases, 43.75% were euthyroid, 37.5% were subclinical hypothyroid and 18.75% were clinical hypothyroid. On the other hand, out of 9 anti-TPO positive control, 55.55% were euthyroid and 44.44% were subclinical hypothyroid. Moreover, in case group, 12.7% euthyroid patients, 54.5% subclinical hypothyroid patients and 75% clinical hypothyroid patients were anti-TPO+. In control group, 7.7% euthyroid and 66.9% subclinical hypothyroid were anti-TPO positivity. Additionally, the mean value of anti-TPO for case was 55.40 (SD = 143.17) and control group was 21.97 (SD = 26.99). There was a significant difference in Anti TPO between the groups (p<0.05). Anti TPO was significantly higher for case group. A study done by Janssen et al (2004) 14 also revealed the same with anti TPO. They got the mean values as (10 ± 18 for controls vs 123 ± 328 for cases, p<0.001) respectively. Another study done by Johannes Ott et al (2010) 15 got the similar findings with anti TPO, being significantly higher in PCOS subjects than in controls (2.5 ± 2.3 vs 1.8 ± 1.0 µU/ml, p<0.001; 40.0 ± 81.7 vs 12.0 ± 36.7 IU/ml, p<0.001 respectively).
Conclusion
From the analysis, it has been found that PCOS is key issue among the women during the reproductive years. PCOS subjects are prone for thyroid disorders, particularly Hypothyroidism. Autoimmunity as Autoimmune thyroiditis is more prevalent in PCOS subjects. Positivity for Anti TPO antibodies is more common in PCOS subjects. Euthyroid PCOS cases with anti TPO positive are at risk of developing hypothyroidism. Thus T3, T4 and TSH should be periodically evaluated in these subjects.