Print ISSN:-2249-8176

Online ISSN:-2348-7682

CODEN : PJMSD7

Current Issue

Year 2024

Volume: 14 , Issue: 3

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 56

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 13


Roy and Kar: Evaluation of binocular once only instillation of timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop for treatment of presbyopia


Introduction

Presbyopia is an age-related condition where near point of eye recedes beyond the ordinary reading or working distance. In emmetropes it usually starts at around 40 years of age. Common treatments of presbyopia consist of use of reading glasses or bifocal/ multifocal eye glasses. Corrective contact lenses may also be used for correcting presbyopia. Surgical options are also available for correcting presbyopia, including eye surgery. Refractive surgery generally involves reshaping of cornea. Refractive surgery to one eye for near vision while leaving the other eye for distant vision, is one of the modalities that may be employed. Intraocular lens implantation is another surgical option. However, eye glasses may be cosmetically unacceptable, lenses may be cumbersome or provide inadequate treatment, and surgery may be risky. In recent times there has been interest among researchers to develop pharmacological agents to treat presbyopia.1 Karanfil FC et al (2017) 2 in their review article discussed the name, content and mechanism of action of these eye drops. Till date about fourteen commercial and non-commercial drops were used or tried in the treatment of presbyopia. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 Although the success to this aim is not overwhelming, some pharmacological agents have already been approved by U.S. Food and Drug administration.20 However, some other drug which has potential for use in the treatment for presbyopia has not been evaluated till date. One such drug is Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop which is commonly used as an intraocular pressure lowering agent in glaucoma for decades. Long-term evaluation of this drop was investigated in a study for a mean follow-up of 31.6 months in a group of 155 patients (275 eyes) with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, and found to be quite safe, serious side-effect requiring discontinuation was only 1.9%. 21 In a resting state, the tone of the ciliary muscle is maintained by mutually opposite interaction between parasympathetic innervation through M3 receptor and sympathetic innervation through beta 2 adrenoceptor receptors. The parasympathetic innervation tends to contract the ciliary muscle and sympathetic innervation tends to relax the ciliary muscle. Therefore, blocking the sympathetic innervation by instilling beta blocker drug like Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop will increase the tonic accommodation22 (as accommodation is caused by contraction of ciliary muscle) and therefore may be helpful in treatment of presbyopia. This mechanism spares pupillary muscles thus do not have any effect on pupillary diameter and also avoids side- effects of multi- drug combination drops which are currently under investigation. Correction of presbyopia by this mechanism of action of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop was evaluated for the first time in literature by our present study.

Hypotheses on Expected Outcome: Reduction of Near Point of Accommodation and increase of Amplitude of Accommodation are the two desirable outcomes of the study, which would be achieved by increase in tonic accommodation by unique mechanism of action of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop as described above. We also hypothesized that the undesirable side effects that accompany Pilocarpine eye drop, like reduction of distant acuity and reduction of intraocular pressure, would not apply to Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop in our study. This is because of the fact that relieved of relaxing effect on it, excursion of ciliary muscle will be more, covering entire range of accommodation required for distant to near back and forth, thus bringing entire accommodation under facultative control of the individual. Our study would employ once-only one-drop Timolol maleate 0.5%, therefore reduction of intraocular pressure is unlikely to occur in this short term use.

Materials and Methods

Inclusion criteria

  1. Informed consent by the participants.

  2. Emmetropic subjects between 35-45 years age group with distant visual acuity 6/6 with no systemic or ocular pathology.

  3. Intraocular pressure (IOP) 12 - 21 mm of Hg.

  4. The patients included in the study did not receive any chronic mydriatic/miotic therapy previously.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Age less than 35 and more than 45yrs.

  2. Subjects with previous systemic or ocular pathology.

  3. IOP less than 12 and more than 21 mm of Hg.

  4. Patients who did not give informed consent prior to the study.

  5. Subjects with history of ischemic heart disease.

  6. Subjects with diabetes on insulin medication.

  7. Subjects with history of depression.

  8. Subjects with peripheral vascular disease.

Safety parameters of Timolol In our study. Before giving the eye drop 0.5% Timolol maleate, the history regarding the following were taken. 1. Asthma 2. History of bradycardia 3. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 4. Heart block 5. Allergic reaction (example - anaphylaxis, atopy) 6. Blood vessel disease 7. Myasthenia gravis 8. Lung disease 9. Diabetes 10. Glaucoma 11. Stage IV heart failure

After getting approval from the Institutional ethics committee, and informed consent, we recruited 40 emmetropic subjects (80 eyes) between 35-45 years age, and randomly assigned them to binocular once only instillation of one drop of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop (intervention group, 20 subjects) or Normal saline eye drop (Control group, 20 subjects). For every subject, Distant Visual Acuity, Intraocular pressure, Near Point of Accommodation measured by Royal Air Force Rule, were assessed prior to giving eye drop and then at 1/2 hr, 1 hr , 1 ½ hrs , 2 hrs , 2 ½ hrs , 3 hrs, 3 ½ hrs ,4 hrs , 4 ½ hrs, 5 hrs , 5 ½ hrs ,6 hrs and if the effect does not wean off after 6 hrs half hourly examination to be continued till effect started to wean off. We found effect started to wean off after 8 hrs. In control group (Normal Saline eye drop) same measurements were taken. Amplitude of Accommodation was calculated for each NPA value by applying formula as below and included in the data analysis. Formula: A = P-R.

A = Amplitude of Accommodation; P = Refractive power (Dioptre) of eye at NPA=100/NPA;

R= Refractive power (Dioptre) of eye when looking at distance (∞)* = 100/∞=0

*As study subjects are emmetropic.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as Mean, Median and Standard Deviation and compared across the groups by Mann-Whitney U test since the data did not follow normal distribution as checked using Shapiro Wilk Test. The statistical software SPSS version 25 was used for the analysis. An alpha level of 5% has been taken, i.e. if any p value is less than 0.05 it has been considered as significant.

Results

The intervention and control groups were age and sex matched. The minimum and maximum age in intervention group were 35 years 42 years respectively, and in control group 36 years 44 years respectively. The mean age in intervention and control group were 37.3+/-2.31 years and 38.45 +/- 2.11 years respectively (P = 0.1085). Gender distribution in intervention group was Male: Female = 11(55%): 9(45%) and in control group 15 (75%): 5(25%) (P= 0.185). Hour-wise change of Near Point of Accommodation (in centimetre) and Amplitude of Accommodation (in Dioptre) in the Intervention and Control groups are shown in the Table 1, Table 2 respectively.

Table 1

Hour-wise change of Near Point of Accommodation (in centimetre)

 Near point of accommodation (Centimetre) 

Group

Intervention

Control

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

p Value

Significance

before drop

24.95

24.00

5.17

23.30

24.00

1.38

0.323

Not Significant

After 1/2hr

23.96

23.00

4.38

23.35

24.00

1.39

0.828

Not Significant

After 1hr

23.56

22.90

4.33

23.35

23.95

1.37

0.551

Not Significant

After 1 1/2hrs

23.00

22.70

4.23

23.39

24.00

1.35

0.183

Not Significant

After 2hrs

22.31

22.00

4.05

23.44

24.05

1.37

0.018

Significant

After 2 1/2hrs

21.44

21.30

3.81

23.40

24.05

1.36

0.002

Significant

After 3hrs

20.92

20.80

3.72

23.42

24.05

1.36

0.001

Significant

After 3 1/2hrs

20.39

20.00

3.57

23.38

24.00

1.35

<0.001

Significant

After 4hrs

19.69

19.40

3.61

23.39

24.00

1.38

<0.001

Significant

After 41/2hrs

19.14

19.30

3.34

23.39

24.00

1.38

<0.001

Significant

After 5hrs

18.79

19.00

3.31

23.42

24.05

1.38

<0.001

Significant

After 6hrs

18.66

18.80

3.29

23.48

24.05

1.39

<0.001

Significant

After 7hrs

18.73

18.80

3.29

23.50

24.20

1.38

<0.001

Significant

After 8hrs

19.94

19.80

3.52

23.45

24.00

1.43

<0.001

Significant

After 9hrs

20.61

20.20

3.65

23.43

24.00

1.42

<0.001

Significant

After 10hrs

21.10

21.20

3.80

23.45

24.00

1.35

<0.001

Significant

Change After 1/2hr

0.99

0.40

1.51

-0.05

0.00

0.08

<0.001

Significant

Change After 1hr

1.39

0.90

1.55

-0.05

0.00

0.09

<0.001

Significant

Change After 1 1/2hrs

1.95

1.30

1.87

-0.09

0.00

0.15

<0.001

Significant

Change After 2hrs

2.64

2.00

1.91

-0.14

-0.10

0.13

<0.001

Significant

Change After 2 1/2hrs

3.51

3.00

2.27

-0.10

-0.10

0.13

<0.001

Significant

Change After 3hrs

4.03

3.20

2.31

-0.12

-0.10

0.13

<0.001

Significant

Change After 3 1/2hrs

4.56

4.00

2.51

-0.08

-0.10

0.10

<0.001

Significant

Change After 4hrs

5.26

5.00

2.48

-0.09

-0.10

0.09

<0.001

Significant

Change After 41/2hrs

5.81

5.10

2.89

-0.09

-0.10

0.09

<0.001

Significant

Change After 5hrs

6.16

5.40

2.91

-0.12

-0.10

0.08

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 6hrs

6.29

5.60

2.89

-0.17

-0.20

0.11

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 7hrs

6.22

5.30

2.92

-0.20

-0.20

0.11

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 8hrs

5.01

4.20

3.12

-0.15

-0.20

0.21

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 9hrs

4.34

3.40

3.10

-0.13

-0.10

0.22

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 10hrs

3.85

3.00

3.25

-0.15

-0.20

0.26

<0.001

Significant

Graphical representations of hour-wise changes of Near Point of Accommodation are depicted; individual tracings of intervention group in Figure 1, that of control group in Figure 2 and comparison between intervention and control groups in Figure 3.

Figure 1

Graph showing individual tracings of NPA of twenty subjects in the intervention group: steady downward slope of NPA tracings soon after instillation of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop till four hours, followed by straightening between four to eight hours.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a9bf9d3e-3686-4e14-9e32-cdb6519b1135image1.png
Figure 2

Graph showing normal saline eye drop (Placebo) had no effect on NPA .

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a9bf9d3e-3686-4e14-9e32-cdb6519b1135image2.png
Figure 3

Graph showing comparison of Near Point of Accommodation between Intervention (Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop) and Control group (Normal saline eye drop).

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a9bf9d3e-3686-4e14-9e32-cdb6519b1135image3.png
Table 2

Hour-wise change of Amplitude of Accommodation (in Dioptre)

Amplitude of accommodation (Dioptre) 

Group

Intervention

Control

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

p Value

Significance

Before drop

4.14

4.17

0.69

4.31

4.17

0.26

0.323

Not Significant

After 1/2hr

4.29

4.35

0.66

4.30

4.17

0.26

0.828

Not Significant

After 1hr

4.36

4.37

0.69

4.30

4.18

0.26

0.551

Not Significant

After 1 1/2hrs

4.47

4.41

0.71

4.29

4.17

0.26

0.183

Not Significant

After 2hrs

4.61

4.55

0.73

4.28

4.16

0.26

0.018

Significant

After 2 1/2hrs

4.79

4.70

0.74

4.29

4.16

0.26

0.002

Significant

After 3hrs

4.91

4.81

0.77

4.28

4.16

0.25

0.001

Significant

After 3 1/2hrs

5.03

5.00

0.77

4.29

4.17

0.26

<0.001

Significant

After 4hrs

5.22

5.16

0.81

4.29

4.17

0.26

<0.001

Significant

After 5hrs

5.45

5.26

0.80

4.28

4.16

0.26

<0.001

Significant

After 6hrs

5.49

5.32

0.82

4.27

4.16

0.26

<0.001

Significant

After 7hrs

5.47

5.32

0.80

4.27

4.13

0.26

<0.001

Significant

After 8hrs

5.14

5.05

0.75

4.28

4.17

0.27

<0.001

Significant

After 9hrs

4.98

4.95

0.76

4.28

4.17

0.27

<0.001

Significant

After 10hrs

4.86

4.72

0.73

4.28

4.17

0.25

<0.001

Significant

Change After - 1/2hr

0.15

0.07

0.22

-0.01

-0.00

0.01

<0.001

Significant

Change After - 1hr

0.22

0.16

0.23

-0.01

-0.00

0.02

<0.001

Significant

Change After - 1 1/2hrs

0.33

0.23

0.31

-0.02

-0.00

0.03

<0.001

Significant

Change After - 2hrs

0.47

0.38

0.30

-0.03

-0.03

0.03

<0.001

Significant

Change After - 2 1/2hrs

0.65

0.53

0.32

-0.02

-0.02

0.02

<0.001

Significant

Change After - After 3hrs

0.77

0.67

0.32

-0.02

-0.03

0.03

<0.001

Significant

Change After - 3 1/2hrs

0.89

0.83

0.36

-0.02

-0.02

0.02

<0.001

Significant

Change After - 4hrs

1.08

1.01

0.39

-0.02

-0.02

0.02

<0.001

Significant

Change After - 5hrs

1.31

1.15

0.42

-0.02

-0.02

0.02

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 6hrs

1.35

1.18

0.42

-0.03

-0.04

0.02

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 7hrs

1.33

1.18

0.43

-0.04

-0.04

0.02

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 8hrs

1.00

0.92

0.44

-0.03

-0.03

0.04

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 9hrs

0.84

0.68

0.44

-0.02

-0.01

0.04

<0.001

Significant

Change - After 10hrs

0.72

0.57

0.46

-0.03

-0.04

0.05

<0.001

Significant

Similarly, graphical representations of hour-wise changes of Amplitude of Accommodation are also depicted in Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6.

Figure 4

Graph showing steady upward slope of amplitude of accommodation soon after instillation of timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop till four hours, followed by flattening between four and eight hours.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a9bf9d3e-3686-4e14-9e32-cdb6519b1135image4.png
Figure 5

Graph showing normal saline eye drop (Placebo) had no effect on amplitude of accommodation.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a9bf9d3e-3686-4e14-9e32-cdb6519b1135image5.png
Figure 6

Graph showing comparison of Amplitude of accommodation between Intervention (Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop) and Control group (Normal saline eye drop)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a9bf9d3e-3686-4e14-9e32-cdb6519b1135image6.png

Near point of Accommodation started to come closer and closer to eye steadily and statistically significantly two hours after instillation of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop till four hours after drop, then remained almost stationary between four and eight hours, then the effect started to wean off.(Table 1,Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3) Therefore Near point of Accommodation maintained a steady state between 4 and 8 hrs of instillation, at points closer to eye by an average 5.79 +/- 2.87cm (P < 0.001).(Table 1) This tantamounts to increase of amplitude of accommodation and thus to, presbyopia correction of + 1.21 +/- 0.42 Dioptre (P < 0.001) sustained for 4 hrs between 4hrs and 8 hrs after instillation of drop.(Table 2,Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 )

There was no statistically significant fall of intraocular pressure (Table 3, Figure 7) or reduction of distant VA (Figure 8). In the intervention group intraocular pressure never fell below 12 mm of Hg, Distant VA never fell below 6/6 (i.e. pre-drop value)

Table 3

Hourly change of intraocular pressure in Intervention group (Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop) and Control group (Normal saline eye drop)

 IOP in mm of Hg

Group

Intervention

Control

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

p Value

Significance

before giving eye drop

13.70

14.00

1.81

13.65

14.00

1.84

0.921

Not Significant

IOP after 1hr of giving drop

13.25

14.00

2.02

13.60

14.00

1.76

0.661

Not Significant

IOP after 2hrs

13.25

14.00

1.55

13.60

14.00

1.76

0.574

Not Significant

IOP after 3hrs

13.40

14.00

1.31

13.60

14.00

1.76

0.705

Not Significant

IOP after 4hrs

13.40

14.00

1.31

13.60

14.00

1.76

0.705

Not Significant

IOP after 5hrs

13.15

14.00

1.27

13.55

14.00

1.70

0.542

Not Significant

IOP after 6hrs

13.20

14.00

1.01

13.65

14.00

1.63

0.471

Not Significant

IOP after 7hrs

13.10

14.00

1.02

13.40

14.00

1.47

0.618

Not Significant

IOP after 8hrs

13.10

14.00

1.02

13.40

14.00

1.47

0.618

Not Significant

IOP after 9hrs

12.90

12.00

1.21

13.40

14.00

1.47

0.270

Not Significant

IOP after 10hrs

12.70

12.00

0.98

13.10

13.00

1.21

0.294

Not Significant

Change after 1hr

0.45

0.00

1.05

0.05

0.00

0.22

0.054

Not Significant

Change after 2hrs

0.45

0.00

0.94

0.05

0.00

0.22

0.074

Not Significant

Change after 3hrs

0.30

0.00

1.42

0.05

0.00

0.22

0.403

Not Significant

Change after 4hrs

0.30

0.00

1.42

0.05

0.00

0.22

0.403

Not Significant

Change after 5hrs

0.55

0.00

1.43

0.10

0.00

0.55

0.192

Not Significant

Change after 6hrs

0.50

0.00

1.57

0.00

0.00

0.73

0.232

Not Significant

Change after 7hrs

0.60

0.00

1.60

0.25

0.00

0.97

0.390

Not Significant

Change after 8hrs

0.60

0.00

1.60

0.25

0.00

0.97

0.390

Not Significant

Change after 9hrs

0.80

0.00

2.04

0.25

0.00

0.97

0.258

Not Significant

Change after 10hrs

1.00

0.50

1.78

0.55

0.00

1.32

0.318

Not Significant

Figure 7

Graph showing change of mean IOP after instillation of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a9bf9d3e-3686-4e14-9e32-cdb6519b1135image7.png
Figure 8

Graph showing timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop had no effect on distant visual acuity.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a9bf9d3e-3686-4e14-9e32-cdb6519b1135image8.png

Discussion

In November 2021, U.S. FDA has approved 1.25% Pilocarpine hydrochloride eye drop for treating presbyopia. This is the only U.S. FDA approved eye drop for presbyopia till date. 20 Pilocarpine causes constriction of pupil and thus causes miosis related side effects like constriction of visual field etc. Roy P et al was first to exploit capsule slackening effect of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop by the mechanism of increased tonic accommodation in hypermature intumescent cataract surgery. 23 Correction of presbyopia as done in our study by this mechanism of action of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop, has not been explored and evaluated before. This mechanism spares pupillary muscles thus does not have any effect on pupillary diameter and also avoids side- effects of multi- drug combination drops which are currently under investigation. The advancing Near Point of Accommodation towards eye and corresponding increase of Amplitude of Accommodation were on expected line as hypothesised. Moreover relieved of relaxing effect on it, excursion of ciliary muscle is now more, covering entire range of accommodation requiring for distant and near vision, thus bringing entire accommodation under facultative control of the individual. Therefore another benefit of exploiting this mechanism lies in that there is no blurring of distant vision as was hypothesized in the beginning of the study. Also as hypothesized there was no statistically significant fall of intraocular pressure.

Conclusion

Binocular once only instillation of one drop of Timolol maleate 0.5% eye drop showed promise for use in the treatment of presbyopia in 35-45 years age group, by adding + 1.2 Dioptre power to refractive system of eye. There was no blurring of distant vision and no significant fall of intraocular pressure. Findings of this research may be utilised for short term near work involving household work like cooking, stitching and office work like lectures, seminars, meetings etc. Future research lies on increasing the duration of action exceeding 4 hrs by instillation of top-up drop.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

A Grzybowski V Ruamviboonsuk Pharmacological Treatment in PresbyopiaJ Clin Med2022115138510.3390/jcm11051385

2 

F Ç Karanfil B Turgut Update on Presbyopia-correcting DropsEur Ophthalmic Rev201711299102

3 

J Benozzi G Benozzi B Orman Presbyopia: a new potential pharmacological treatmentMed Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol20121135

4 

S Patel F Salamun K Matovic Pharmacological treatments of presbyopia: a review of modern perspectivesEye Vis (Lond)20134310.1186/s40662-017-0068-8

5 

S Kaufman Addressing presbyopia pharmacologically, Ophthalmology Times2012https://www.ophthalmologytimes.com/view/addressing-presbyopia-pharmacologically(Accessed 13th February, 2024)

6 

A Abdelkader Improved presbyopic vision with mioticsEye Contact Lens20154153237

7 

LF Vejarano Ophthalmic formulation and method for ameliorating presbyopia, 2012. Patent publication number: US20140024642 A12012http://bit.ly/Vejarano(Accessed 13th February, 2024)

8 

CG Krader C Feinbaum Simple solution for presbyopia: topical agent acts by reducing pupil size to increase depth of focus. Ophthalmology Times2015https://www.ophthalmologytimes.com/view/simple-solution-presbyopia(Accessed 13th February, 2024)

9 

HJV Rodríguez DH Carrera Composición oftálmica para la corrección de la presbicia ,2014,. Patent publication number: WO2015092087A12014http:/bit.ly/Rodríguez (Accessed 13th February, 2024)

10 

A Renna JL Alió LF Vejarano Pharmacological treatments of presbyopia: a review of modern perspectivesEye Vis (Lond)20174310.1186/s40662-017-0068-8Eye Vis; Lond

11 

S Balal R Gil-Cazorla S A Naroo A Sharma S Shah Eyedrops for presbyopia. Myth or medicine?Ophthalmologist2017371627

12 

EJ German D Wood MA Hurst Ocular effects of antimuscarinic compounds: is clinical effect determined by binding affinity for muscarinic receptors or melanin pigment?J Ocul Pharmacol Ther199915325769

13 

FA Moustafa LF Sandoval SR Feldman Rosacea: new and emerging treatmentsDrugs20147413145765

14 

Allergan, A study of the concurrent use of AGN-190584 and AGN-199201 in participants with presbyopia, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT025955282016http://bit.ly/NCT02595528(Accessed on 13th February, 2024).

15 

KS Crawford WH Garner W Burns Dioptin™: A novel pharmaceutical formulation for restoration of accommodation in presbyopesInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2014553765

16 

L Takemoto Increase in the intramolecular disulfide bonding of alpha-a crystallin during aging of the human lensExp Eye Res199663558590

17 

Llc Encorehealth Choline Esters 2014http://bit.ly/cholineesters(accessedon13th

18 

B Burns Encore Vision Reports Positive Phase I/II Results2016http://bit.ly/EV06presbyopia(accessedon13th(Accessed on 13th February, 2024)

19 

AG Novartis Novartis bolsters ophthalmology pipeline though the acquisition of Encore Vision, Inc2016http://bit.ly/encorenovartis(Accessed on 13th February, 2024)

20 

L Harrison FDA Approves Eye Drops for Presbyopia 2024https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/961999#vp2[Accessed on 31st January, 2024]

21 

R J Uusitalo A Palkama Long-term evaluation of timololActa Ophthalmol (Copenh)198967557381

22 

B Winn HM Culhane B Gilmartin NC Strang Effect of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on autonomic control of ciliary smooth muscleOphthalmic Physiol Opt200222535965

23 

P Roy S Ganguli S K Tripathi Pre-operative minimal-cycloplegia mydriasis for capsulorrhexis in hypermature intumescent cataractInd J Clin Exp Ophthalmol2023921938



jats-html.xsl

© 2024 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)