support@ipinnovative.com

Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences

Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences (PJMS) open access, peer-reviewed triannually journal publishing since 2011 and is published under auspices of the “NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre”. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in PJMS.Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with “Uniform requiremen...

PJMS Cover Page

Artificial intelligence and robotics in healthcare: The promise, the hype, and the reality

  • Author Details:   
  • Kunal ,

Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics have emerged as transformative forces in healthcare, promising to revolutionize diagnostics, treatments, and patient care. While AI-powered solutions and robotic systems have great potential, a fine line exists between realistic advancements and overhyped expectations.

Significant advancements in machine learning, data analytics, and automation have driven the integration of AI-driven robotics into healthcare. AI-based algorithms have demonstrated remarkable accuracy in medical imaging, predictive analytics, and personalized medicine. For instance, deep learning models have achieved human-level performance in diagnosing diseases such as diabetic retinopathy and detecting cancerous tumours in radiology scans.[1], [2] Robotic-assisted surgeries, such as those performed by the Smart Tissue Automated Robot (STAR), have enhanced precision and reduced patient recovery times.[3] Moreover, AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants have improved patient engagement, offering round-the-clock medical guidance and preliminary diagnosis. AI-driven robotic systems also play a crucial role in rehabilitation therapy and elder care, with robots such as PARO and Cafero providing companionship and support for patients with cognitive impairments.[4], [5], [6]

Despite the remarkable strides in AI and robotics, considerable hype has been surrounding their capabilities. Some overambitious claims suggest that AI could entirely replace human doctors, an assertion that lacks scientific backing. AI is a powerful tool for augmenting healthcare professionals but cannot replicate human practitioner’s empathy, clinical intuition, and holistic decision-making.[7] Additionally, AI-driven diagnosis still requires human validation to mitigate errors and biases in medical datasets. Another area of concern is the ethical and legal implications of AI in healthcare. Issues related to patient data privacy, bias in AI algorithms, and accountability in case of system failures remain unresolved. The infamous case of IBM Watson Health, which failed to deliver on its promise of transforming oncology treatment, is a cautionary tale of the limitations of AI-driven solutions in complex medical scenarios.[8]

The reality of AI and robotics in healthcare is a blend of optimism and pragmatism. While AI has already demonstrated immense value in diagnostics and robotic-assisted procedures, its widespread adoption faces several challenges. The high cost of AI-powered medical devices, the lack of regulatory frameworks, and the need for extensive clinical validation slow their integration into mainstream healthcare. Future directions should focus on developing AI systems that work in synergy with healthcare professionals rather than attempting to replace them. Investments in explainable AI (XAI) can improve trust in AI-driven decision-making by offering transparency in its reasoning processes.[9], [10] Governments and regulatory bodies must also establish stringent policies to ensure ethical deployment, data security, and equitable access to AI-driven healthcare solutions.

In conclusion, AI and robotics hold immense promise for transforming healthcare, but their potential must be approached with cautious optimism. While AI-powered diagnostics, robotic-assisted surgeries, and automated patient care solutions prove their value, exaggerated claims can lead to unrealistic expectations and ethical dilemmas. The future of AI in healthcare lies in collaborative human-AI partnerships, rigrous validation, and responsible implementation to ensure that technology serves as a complement rather than a replacement for medical professionals.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2402-10. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mckinney S, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J, Antropova N, Ashrafian H. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577(7788):89-94. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shademan A, Decker R, Opfermann J, Leonard S, Krieger A, Kim P. Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(337). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  4. Broadbent E, Stafford R, Macdonald B. Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions. Int J Soc Robotics. 2009;1:319-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  5. Huang T, Liu H. Acceptability of Robots to Assist the Elderly by Future Designers: A Case of Guangdong Ocean University Industrial Design Students. Sustainability. 2019;11(15). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  6. Sawik B, Tobis S, Baum E, Suwalska A, Kropińska S, Stachnik K. Robots for Elderly Care: Review, Multi-Criteria Optimization Model and Qualitative Case Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  7. MC. Deep medicine, artificial intelligence, and the practising clinician. Lancet. 2019;394(10200). [Google Scholar]
  8. Strickland E, Watson. heal thyself: How IBM overpromised and underdelivered on AI health care. IEEE Spectrum. 2019;56(4):24-31. [Google Scholar]
  9. Doshi-Velez F, Kim B. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint. 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  10. Vishwarupe V, Joshi P, Mathias N, Maheshwari S, Mhaisalkar S, Pawar V. Explainable AI and interpretable machine learning: A case study in perspective. Proc Comp Sci. 2022;204:869-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Article Metrics

  • Visibility 9 Views
  • Downloads 4 Views
  • DOI 10.18231/pjms.v.15.i.1.1-2
  • CrossMark
  • Citation
  • Received Date February 02, 2025
  • Accepted Date February 24, 2025
  • Publication Date March 12, 2025