Reviewer Resources

What is Peer Review

Peer review is the evaluation of work by a group of people (Peers) having same level of competencies and working in same field. Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research areas assess submitted m [read more]

Benefits for Reviewers

Reviewing a manuscript is a time taking process but Peer-Reviewing offers several benefits to both reviewers and scientific community by improving the quality of published research. We have listed some major benefits of becoming a reviewer: Volunteering as a peer reviewer provides you incredi [read more]

Invitation to Join Innovative Volunteer Reviewer

Review of manuscripts is essential to the publication process, and you will learn a lot about scientific publishing by serving as a reviewer. We cordially invite you to join our team of journal reviewers. If you are interested in joining as a reviewer for our journals, please register with the [read more]

Invitation to Reviewers

Manuscripts submitted to Innovative journal are reviewed by at least two subject experts. Reviewers are asked to evaluate the quality of the manuscript and to provide a recommendation to the external editor on where a manuscript can be accepted, requires major or minor revision, or should [read more]

Peer Review Checklist

S. NoParticulars  Details Description1.TitleDoes the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript? Is the title complete? 2.AbstractDoes the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?3.KeywordsDo the keywords reflect the focus of the manuscript? [read more]

Review Structure

Is the manuscript clearly laid out? It should be check properly whether all points are addressed properly or not? Consider each element in turn: Title: Does it clearly describe the manuscript?Abstract: Does it reflect the content of the manuscript?Introduction: Does it describe [read more]

Peer Review Process

The peer review process can be broadly summarized into various steps, although these steps differ slightly from Journal to Journal as mentioned in the diagram below.   Feedback: “Reviewers should remember that they are representing the readers of the journal. Will the readers of this pa [read more]

Reviewer Overall Recommendation

Please provide an overall recommendation for the publication of the manuscript as follows:   Accept Paper in Present Form: The manuscript is accepted without any further changes.Accept Paper After Minor Revisions: The manuscript is in principle accepted after revision based on the revie [read more]

What is ORCID?

ORCID is a non-profit organization that provides researchers with a unique digital identifier. These identifiers can be used by publishers, authors, editors, funding agencies, and institutions to reliably identify individuals in the same way that ISSNs and DOIs identify journals and articles. [read more]

Conflicts of Interests

Innovative ask reviewers to inform the journal editor if they hold a conflict of interest that may determine the review report, either in a negative or positive direction. The editorial office team will check as far as possible before the invitation, however, we appreciate the cooperation of r [read more]

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Guidelines

Peer reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and credibility of research. That is why it is essential to approach this responsibility with transparency and care. AI tools must not be used to process or review submitted manuscripts, not even for improving the la [read more]

Reviewer Resources

“Quality of research publication is our goal”, Innovative Training and Support team is continuously working hard for the quality content of journals. We have prepared a gist of a video bites series to support peer review learning . These are 24*7 accessible self-learning modules. Fo [read more]